Cargando…
Predictors of technical difficulty with duodenal ESD
Background and study aims Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is still considered technically challenging; however, few studies have objectively analyzed predictors of the technical difficulty. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to elucidate predictors of the technical difficul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2019
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0967-4744 |
_version_ | 1783477969883234304 |
---|---|
author | Kato, Motohiko Sasaki, Motoki Mizutani, Mari Tsutsumi, Koshiro Kiguchi, Yoshiyuki Akimoto, Teppei Mutaguchi, Makoto Nakayama, Atsushi Takabayashi, Kaoru Fujimoto, Ai Ochiai, Yasutoshi Maehata, Tadateru Kanai, Takanori Yahagi, Naohisa |
author_facet | Kato, Motohiko Sasaki, Motoki Mizutani, Mari Tsutsumi, Koshiro Kiguchi, Yoshiyuki Akimoto, Teppei Mutaguchi, Makoto Nakayama, Atsushi Takabayashi, Kaoru Fujimoto, Ai Ochiai, Yasutoshi Maehata, Tadateru Kanai, Takanori Yahagi, Naohisa |
author_sort | Kato, Motohiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is still considered technically challenging; however, few studies have objectively analyzed predictors of the technical difficulty. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to elucidate predictors of the technical difficulty of duodenal ESD. Patients and methods This was a retrospective observational study. From June 2010 to June 2017, a total of 174 consecutive patients with superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia who underwent ESD were included in this study. We tried to identify predictors for technical difficulty of ESD by defining technical difficulty as either procedure time > 100 minutes or intraprocedural perforation. Moreover, we constructed a scoring system consisting of factors that were significant in the multivariate analysis. Results The proportion of patients with technical difficulty was 34.5 %. In the multivariate analysis, lesion location in flexural part [odds ratio (OR), 2.61; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.02 – 6.68], larger lesion size (> 40 mm) (OR, 5.26; 95% CI, 2.15 – 12.9), and occupied circumference > 50 % of the duodenum (OR, 5.80; 95 % CI, 1.83 – 18.4) were associated with technical difficulty. Conclusion A lesion location in flexural part, lesion size >40 mm and occupied circumference > 50 % were risk factors for technical difficulty of duodenal ESD. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6904240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69042402019-12-11 Predictors of technical difficulty with duodenal ESD Kato, Motohiko Sasaki, Motoki Mizutani, Mari Tsutsumi, Koshiro Kiguchi, Yoshiyuki Akimoto, Teppei Mutaguchi, Makoto Nakayama, Atsushi Takabayashi, Kaoru Fujimoto, Ai Ochiai, Yasutoshi Maehata, Tadateru Kanai, Takanori Yahagi, Naohisa Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is still considered technically challenging; however, few studies have objectively analyzed predictors of the technical difficulty. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to elucidate predictors of the technical difficulty of duodenal ESD. Patients and methods This was a retrospective observational study. From June 2010 to June 2017, a total of 174 consecutive patients with superficial duodenal epithelial neoplasia who underwent ESD were included in this study. We tried to identify predictors for technical difficulty of ESD by defining technical difficulty as either procedure time > 100 minutes or intraprocedural perforation. Moreover, we constructed a scoring system consisting of factors that were significant in the multivariate analysis. Results The proportion of patients with technical difficulty was 34.5 %. In the multivariate analysis, lesion location in flexural part [odds ratio (OR), 2.61; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.02 – 6.68], larger lesion size (> 40 mm) (OR, 5.26; 95% CI, 2.15 – 12.9), and occupied circumference > 50 % of the duodenum (OR, 5.80; 95 % CI, 1.83 – 18.4) were associated with technical difficulty. Conclusion A lesion location in flexural part, lesion size >40 mm and occupied circumference > 50 % were risk factors for technical difficulty of duodenal ESD. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2019-12 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6904240/ /pubmed/31828213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0967-4744 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Kato, Motohiko Sasaki, Motoki Mizutani, Mari Tsutsumi, Koshiro Kiguchi, Yoshiyuki Akimoto, Teppei Mutaguchi, Makoto Nakayama, Atsushi Takabayashi, Kaoru Fujimoto, Ai Ochiai, Yasutoshi Maehata, Tadateru Kanai, Takanori Yahagi, Naohisa Predictors of technical difficulty with duodenal ESD |
title | Predictors of technical difficulty with duodenal ESD |
title_full | Predictors of technical difficulty with duodenal ESD |
title_fullStr | Predictors of technical difficulty with duodenal ESD |
title_full_unstemmed | Predictors of technical difficulty with duodenal ESD |
title_short | Predictors of technical difficulty with duodenal ESD |
title_sort | predictors of technical difficulty with duodenal esd |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31828213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0967-4744 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katomotohiko predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT sasakimotoki predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT mizutanimari predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT tsutsumikoshiro predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT kiguchiyoshiyuki predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT akimototeppei predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT mutaguchimakoto predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT nakayamaatsushi predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT takabayashikaoru predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT fujimotoai predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT ochiaiyasutoshi predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT maehatatadateru predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT kanaitakanori predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd AT yahaginaohisa predictorsoftechnicaldifficultywithduodenalesd |