Cargando…
AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10
Over the last decade, several regulatory guidelines on bioanalytical method validation (BMV) have been issued by regulatory agencies around the world. This has left the bioanalytical community struggling with regional differences in regulatory expectations when preparing for global pharmaceutical su...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0398-7 |
_version_ | 1783477999672229888 |
---|---|
author | Booth, Brian Vazvaei, Faye Fluhler, Eric Myler, Heather Woolf, Eric |
author_facet | Booth, Brian Vazvaei, Faye Fluhler, Eric Myler, Heather Woolf, Eric |
author_sort | Booth, Brian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over the last decade, several regulatory guidelines on bioanalytical method validation (BMV) have been issued by regulatory agencies around the world. This has left the bioanalytical community struggling with regional differences in regulatory expectations when preparing for global pharmaceutical submissions. The International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) has the mission to achieve greater harmonization worldwide to ensure that safe, effective, and high-quality medicines are developed and registered in the most resource-efficient manner. Following calls for harmonization, ICH-selected bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis among its topics for guidance development and earlier this year released a draft guideline (M10) on BMV for public consultation. In response, the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) held a 3-day workshop to provide a forum for regulatory, industry, and academic scientists to discuss the guideline and hear various points of view on key aspects. While there was agreement that the draft guideline is generally well written and comprehensive, specific topics generated considerable discussion and, in some cases, revision recommendations for consideration by the expert working group (EWG) responsible for the guideline content. This report provides a summary of the workshop proceedings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6904406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69044062019-12-24 AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10 Booth, Brian Vazvaei, Faye Fluhler, Eric Myler, Heather Woolf, Eric AAPS J Meeting Report Over the last decade, several regulatory guidelines on bioanalytical method validation (BMV) have been issued by regulatory agencies around the world. This has left the bioanalytical community struggling with regional differences in regulatory expectations when preparing for global pharmaceutical submissions. The International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) has the mission to achieve greater harmonization worldwide to ensure that safe, effective, and high-quality medicines are developed and registered in the most resource-efficient manner. Following calls for harmonization, ICH-selected bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis among its topics for guidance development and earlier this year released a draft guideline (M10) on BMV for public consultation. In response, the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) held a 3-day workshop to provide a forum for regulatory, industry, and academic scientists to discuss the guideline and hear various points of view on key aspects. While there was agreement that the draft guideline is generally well written and comprehensive, specific topics generated considerable discussion and, in some cases, revision recommendations for consideration by the expert working group (EWG) responsible for the guideline content. This report provides a summary of the workshop proceedings. Springer International Publishing 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6904406/ /pubmed/31823177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0398-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Meeting Report Booth, Brian Vazvaei, Faye Fluhler, Eric Myler, Heather Woolf, Eric AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10 |
title | AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10 |
title_full | AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10 |
title_fullStr | AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10 |
title_full_unstemmed | AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10 |
title_short | AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10 |
title_sort | aaps workshop report on ich m10 |
topic | Meeting Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0398-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boothbrian aapsworkshopreportonichm10 AT vazvaeifaye aapsworkshopreportonichm10 AT fluhlereric aapsworkshopreportonichm10 AT mylerheather aapsworkshopreportonichm10 AT woolferic aapsworkshopreportonichm10 |