Cargando…

AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10

Over the last decade, several regulatory guidelines on bioanalytical method validation (BMV) have been issued by regulatory agencies around the world. This has left the bioanalytical community struggling with regional differences in regulatory expectations when preparing for global pharmaceutical su...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Booth, Brian, Vazvaei, Faye, Fluhler, Eric, Myler, Heather, Woolf, Eric
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0398-7
_version_ 1783477999672229888
author Booth, Brian
Vazvaei, Faye
Fluhler, Eric
Myler, Heather
Woolf, Eric
author_facet Booth, Brian
Vazvaei, Faye
Fluhler, Eric
Myler, Heather
Woolf, Eric
author_sort Booth, Brian
collection PubMed
description Over the last decade, several regulatory guidelines on bioanalytical method validation (BMV) have been issued by regulatory agencies around the world. This has left the bioanalytical community struggling with regional differences in regulatory expectations when preparing for global pharmaceutical submissions. The International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) has the mission to achieve greater harmonization worldwide to ensure that safe, effective, and high-quality medicines are developed and registered in the most resource-efficient manner. Following calls for harmonization, ICH-selected bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis among its topics for guidance development and earlier this year released a draft guideline (M10) on BMV for public consultation. In response, the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) held a 3-day workshop to provide a forum for regulatory, industry, and academic scientists to discuss the guideline and hear various points of view on key aspects. While there was agreement that the draft guideline is generally well written and comprehensive, specific topics generated considerable discussion and, in some cases, revision recommendations for consideration by the expert working group (EWG) responsible for the guideline content. This report provides a summary of the workshop proceedings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6904406
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69044062019-12-24 AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10 Booth, Brian Vazvaei, Faye Fluhler, Eric Myler, Heather Woolf, Eric AAPS J Meeting Report Over the last decade, several regulatory guidelines on bioanalytical method validation (BMV) have been issued by regulatory agencies around the world. This has left the bioanalytical community struggling with regional differences in regulatory expectations when preparing for global pharmaceutical submissions. The International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) has the mission to achieve greater harmonization worldwide to ensure that safe, effective, and high-quality medicines are developed and registered in the most resource-efficient manner. Following calls for harmonization, ICH-selected bioanalytical method validation and sample analysis among its topics for guidance development and earlier this year released a draft guideline (M10) on BMV for public consultation. In response, the American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists (AAPS) held a 3-day workshop to provide a forum for regulatory, industry, and academic scientists to discuss the guideline and hear various points of view on key aspects. While there was agreement that the draft guideline is generally well written and comprehensive, specific topics generated considerable discussion and, in some cases, revision recommendations for consideration by the expert working group (EWG) responsible for the guideline content. This report provides a summary of the workshop proceedings. Springer International Publishing 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6904406/ /pubmed/31823177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0398-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Meeting Report
Booth, Brian
Vazvaei, Faye
Fluhler, Eric
Myler, Heather
Woolf, Eric
AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10
title AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10
title_full AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10
title_fullStr AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10
title_full_unstemmed AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10
title_short AAPS Workshop Report on ICH M10
title_sort aaps workshop report on ich m10
topic Meeting Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904406/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12248-019-0398-7
work_keys_str_mv AT boothbrian aapsworkshopreportonichm10
AT vazvaeifaye aapsworkshopreportonichm10
AT fluhlereric aapsworkshopreportonichm10
AT mylerheather aapsworkshopreportonichm10
AT woolferic aapsworkshopreportonichm10