Cargando…

Good MRI images: to Gad or not to Gad?

Gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents (Gad-CA) were formerly considered as alternatives to X-ray-employed iodinated media. Although originally thought to be nonnephrotoxic and proven to be nonhazardous in a healthy population, the Gad-CA safety issue is progressively more...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steen, Henning, Schwenger, Vedat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17574478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00467-007-0509-z
_version_ 1783478001321639936
author Steen, Henning
Schwenger, Vedat
author_facet Steen, Henning
Schwenger, Vedat
author_sort Steen, Henning
collection PubMed
description Gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents (Gad-CA) were formerly considered as alternatives to X-ray-employed iodinated media. Although originally thought to be nonnephrotoxic and proven to be nonhazardous in a healthy population, the Gad-CA safety issue is progressively more controversial in the high-risk group of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Recently, Gad-CAs have not only been blamed for harmless side effects such as dizziness or nausea but also for much more severe complications such as acute renal failure, pancreatitis, or even the development of so-called “nephrogenic systemic fibrosis” in patients with renal failure, culminating in the prohibition of gadodiamide (Omniscan) administration in ESRD patients and, due to renal-organ immaturity, in newborns and infants up to 1 year old. This editorial is written to give insights into the molecular structure of Gad-CAs as well as into the potential biochemical pathomechanisms underlying the aforementioned severe clinical manifestations. Furthermore, a review about the latest literature on Gad-CA nephrotoxicity is provided. Potential risk factors are mentioned and strategies to avoid deterioration of renal function are presented. Cases with Gad-CA-associated adverse events should be adequately documented and reported appropriately. MRI professionals should collaborate closely with their colleagues from other medical specialties to identify patients with adverse events.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6904413
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2007
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69044132019-12-24 Good MRI images: to Gad or not to Gad? Steen, Henning Schwenger, Vedat Pediatr Nephrol Editorial Commentary Gadolinium-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents (Gad-CA) were formerly considered as alternatives to X-ray-employed iodinated media. Although originally thought to be nonnephrotoxic and proven to be nonhazardous in a healthy population, the Gad-CA safety issue is progressively more controversial in the high-risk group of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Recently, Gad-CAs have not only been blamed for harmless side effects such as dizziness or nausea but also for much more severe complications such as acute renal failure, pancreatitis, or even the development of so-called “nephrogenic systemic fibrosis” in patients with renal failure, culminating in the prohibition of gadodiamide (Omniscan) administration in ESRD patients and, due to renal-organ immaturity, in newborns and infants up to 1 year old. This editorial is written to give insights into the molecular structure of Gad-CAs as well as into the potential biochemical pathomechanisms underlying the aforementioned severe clinical manifestations. Furthermore, a review about the latest literature on Gad-CA nephrotoxicity is provided. Potential risk factors are mentioned and strategies to avoid deterioration of renal function are presented. Cases with Gad-CA-associated adverse events should be adequately documented and reported appropriately. MRI professionals should collaborate closely with their colleagues from other medical specialties to identify patients with adverse events. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2007-09-01 2007 /pmc/articles/PMC6904413/ /pubmed/17574478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00467-007-0509-z Text en © IPNA 2007 This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Editorial Commentary
Steen, Henning
Schwenger, Vedat
Good MRI images: to Gad or not to Gad?
title Good MRI images: to Gad or not to Gad?
title_full Good MRI images: to Gad or not to Gad?
title_fullStr Good MRI images: to Gad or not to Gad?
title_full_unstemmed Good MRI images: to Gad or not to Gad?
title_short Good MRI images: to Gad or not to Gad?
title_sort good mri images: to gad or not to gad?
topic Editorial Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904413/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17574478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00467-007-0509-z
work_keys_str_mv AT steenhenning goodmriimagestogadornottogad
AT schwengervedat goodmriimagestogadornottogad