Cargando…

Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

OBJECTIVE: To explore the difference in pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) comparing the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs taken in supine and standing positions. METHODS: A prospective study of DDH patients undergoing Bernese periacetabular oste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Guo‐yue, Li, Ya‐yue, Luo, Dian‐zhong, Hui, Cheng, Xiao, Kai, Zhang, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31724289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12574
_version_ 1783478031089664000
author Yang, Guo‐yue
Li, Ya‐yue
Luo, Dian‐zhong
Hui, Cheng
Xiao, Kai
Zhang, Hong
author_facet Yang, Guo‐yue
Li, Ya‐yue
Luo, Dian‐zhong
Hui, Cheng
Xiao, Kai
Zhang, Hong
author_sort Yang, Guo‐yue
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the difference in pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) comparing the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs taken in supine and standing positions. METHODS: A prospective study of DDH patients undergoing Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) was conducted. AP pelvic radiographs were taken in supine and standing positions before surgery The pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters from the two radiographs were compared. Contrast parameters included the distance between the pubic symphysis to sacrococcygeal distance (PSSC), lateral center‐edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle (TA), and angle of sharp (SA). RESULTS: A total of 110 young DDH patients were enrolled, including 32 men and 78 women, aged 18–49 years. The male PSSC was 45.63 ± 13.69 mm in supine position and 36.91 ± 12.33 mm in standing position (P < 0.05). The female PSSC was 56.76 ± 13.54 mm in supine position and 48.62 ± 15.44 mm in standing position (P < 0.05). In this study, LCEA <20° in AP pelvic radiographs in the supine position was found in 52 men and 135 women. For male patients, in supine position and standing position, LCEA were 5.51° ± 11.88° and 4.45° ± 12.22°, respectively (P < 0.05); TA were 20.20° ± 9.63° and 21.30° ± 9.97°, respectively (P < 0.05), and SA comparison showed no significant differences. For female patients, in supine position and standing position, LCEA were 3.07° ± 12.07° and 1.69° ± 12.11°, respectively (P < 0.05), TA were 22.62° ± 9.31° and 23.82° ± 9.45°, respectively (P < 0.05), and SA were 48.01° ± 4.68° and 48.49° ± 4.74°, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with the supine position, the young DDH patients have pelvic tilt backward and a decrease in hip coverage in the standing position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6904620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69046202019-12-20 Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip Yang, Guo‐yue Li, Ya‐yue Luo, Dian‐zhong Hui, Cheng Xiao, Kai Zhang, Hong Orthop Surg Clinical Articles OBJECTIVE: To explore the difference in pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) comparing the anteroposterior (AP) pelvic radiographs taken in supine and standing positions. METHODS: A prospective study of DDH patients undergoing Bernese periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) was conducted. AP pelvic radiographs were taken in supine and standing positions before surgery The pelvic tilt and hip joint parameters from the two radiographs were compared. Contrast parameters included the distance between the pubic symphysis to sacrococcygeal distance (PSSC), lateral center‐edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle (TA), and angle of sharp (SA). RESULTS: A total of 110 young DDH patients were enrolled, including 32 men and 78 women, aged 18–49 years. The male PSSC was 45.63 ± 13.69 mm in supine position and 36.91 ± 12.33 mm in standing position (P < 0.05). The female PSSC was 56.76 ± 13.54 mm in supine position and 48.62 ± 15.44 mm in standing position (P < 0.05). In this study, LCEA <20° in AP pelvic radiographs in the supine position was found in 52 men and 135 women. For male patients, in supine position and standing position, LCEA were 5.51° ± 11.88° and 4.45° ± 12.22°, respectively (P < 0.05); TA were 20.20° ± 9.63° and 21.30° ± 9.97°, respectively (P < 0.05), and SA comparison showed no significant differences. For female patients, in supine position and standing position, LCEA were 3.07° ± 12.07° and 1.69° ± 12.11°, respectively (P < 0.05), TA were 22.62° ± 9.31° and 23.82° ± 9.45°, respectively (P < 0.05), and SA were 48.01° ± 4.68° and 48.49° ± 4.74°, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with the supine position, the young DDH patients have pelvic tilt backward and a decrease in hip coverage in the standing position. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6904620/ /pubmed/31724289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12574 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Chinese Orthopaedic Association and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Articles
Yang, Guo‐yue
Li, Ya‐yue
Luo, Dian‐zhong
Hui, Cheng
Xiao, Kai
Zhang, Hong
Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_full Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_fullStr Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_full_unstemmed Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_short Differences of Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs Between Supine Position and Standing Position in Patients with Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_sort differences of anteroposterior pelvic radiographs between supine position and standing position in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip
topic Clinical Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31724289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/os.12574
work_keys_str_mv AT yangguoyue differencesofanteroposteriorpelvicradiographsbetweensupinepositionandstandingpositioninpatientswithdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT liyayue differencesofanteroposteriorpelvicradiographsbetweensupinepositionandstandingpositioninpatientswithdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT luodianzhong differencesofanteroposteriorpelvicradiographsbetweensupinepositionandstandingpositioninpatientswithdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT huicheng differencesofanteroposteriorpelvicradiographsbetweensupinepositionandstandingpositioninpatientswithdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT xiaokai differencesofanteroposteriorpelvicradiographsbetweensupinepositionandstandingpositioninpatientswithdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT zhanghong differencesofanteroposteriorpelvicradiographsbetweensupinepositionandstandingpositioninpatientswithdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip