Cargando…

Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care

BACKGROUND: Prognosticating the course of diseases to inform decision-making is a key component of intensive care medicine. For several applications in medicine, new methods from the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have already outperformed conventional prediction models....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beil, Michael, Proft, Ingo, van Heerden, Daniel, Sviri, Sigal, van Heerden, Peter Vernon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0286-6
_version_ 1783478043432452096
author Beil, Michael
Proft, Ingo
van Heerden, Daniel
Sviri, Sigal
van Heerden, Peter Vernon
author_facet Beil, Michael
Proft, Ingo
van Heerden, Daniel
Sviri, Sigal
van Heerden, Peter Vernon
author_sort Beil, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prognosticating the course of diseases to inform decision-making is a key component of intensive care medicine. For several applications in medicine, new methods from the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have already outperformed conventional prediction models. Due to their technical characteristics, these methods will present new ethical challenges to the intensivist. RESULTS: In addition to the standards of data stewardship in medicine, the selection of datasets and algorithms to create AI prognostication models must involve extensive scrutiny to avoid biases and, consequently, injustice against individuals or groups of patients. Assessment of these models for compliance with the ethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence should also include quantification of predictive uncertainty. Respect for patients’ autonomy during decision-making requires transparency of the data processing by AI models to explain the predictions derived from these models. Moreover, a system of continuous oversight can help to maintain public trust in this technology. Based on these considerations as well as recent guidelines, we propose a pathway to an ethical implementation of AI-based prognostication. It includes a checklist for new AI models that deals with medical and technical topics as well as patient- and system-centered issues. CONCLUSION: AI models for prognostication will become valuable tools in intensive care. However, they require technical refinement and a careful implementation according to the standards of medical ethics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6904702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69047022019-12-26 Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care Beil, Michael Proft, Ingo van Heerden, Daniel Sviri, Sigal van Heerden, Peter Vernon Intensive Care Med Exp Review BACKGROUND: Prognosticating the course of diseases to inform decision-making is a key component of intensive care medicine. For several applications in medicine, new methods from the field of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have already outperformed conventional prediction models. Due to their technical characteristics, these methods will present new ethical challenges to the intensivist. RESULTS: In addition to the standards of data stewardship in medicine, the selection of datasets and algorithms to create AI prognostication models must involve extensive scrutiny to avoid biases and, consequently, injustice against individuals or groups of patients. Assessment of these models for compliance with the ethical principles of beneficence and non-maleficence should also include quantification of predictive uncertainty. Respect for patients’ autonomy during decision-making requires transparency of the data processing by AI models to explain the predictions derived from these models. Moreover, a system of continuous oversight can help to maintain public trust in this technology. Based on these considerations as well as recent guidelines, we propose a pathway to an ethical implementation of AI-based prognostication. It includes a checklist for new AI models that deals with medical and technical topics as well as patient- and system-centered issues. CONCLUSION: AI models for prognostication will become valuable tools in intensive care. However, they require technical refinement and a careful implementation according to the standards of medical ethics. Springer International Publishing 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6904702/ /pubmed/31823128 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0286-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Beil, Michael
Proft, Ingo
van Heerden, Daniel
Sviri, Sigal
van Heerden, Peter Vernon
Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care
title Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care
title_full Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care
title_fullStr Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care
title_full_unstemmed Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care
title_short Ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care
title_sort ethical considerations about artificial intelligence for prognostication in intensive care
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6904702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823128
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-019-0286-6
work_keys_str_mv AT beilmichael ethicalconsiderationsaboutartificialintelligenceforprognosticationinintensivecare
AT proftingo ethicalconsiderationsaboutartificialintelligenceforprognosticationinintensivecare
AT vanheerdendaniel ethicalconsiderationsaboutartificialintelligenceforprognosticationinintensivecare
AT svirisigal ethicalconsiderationsaboutartificialintelligenceforprognosticationinintensivecare
AT vanheerdenpetervernon ethicalconsiderationsaboutartificialintelligenceforprognosticationinintensivecare