Cargando…

Sex differences in dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing phase one training

BACKGROUND: British Army Phase One training exposes men and women to challenging distances of 13.5 km·d(− 1) vs. 11.8 km·d(− 1) and energy expenditures of ~ 4000 kcal·d(− 1) and ~ 3000 kcal·d(− 1), respectively. As such, it is essential that adequate nutrition is provided to support training demands...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapman, Shaun, Roberts, Justin, Smith, Lee, Rawcliffe, Alex, Izard, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-019-0327-2
_version_ 1783478101579137024
author Chapman, Shaun
Roberts, Justin
Smith, Lee
Rawcliffe, Alex
Izard, Rachel
author_facet Chapman, Shaun
Roberts, Justin
Smith, Lee
Rawcliffe, Alex
Izard, Rachel
author_sort Chapman, Shaun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: British Army Phase One training exposes men and women to challenging distances of 13.5 km·d(− 1) vs. 11.8 km·d(− 1) and energy expenditures of ~ 4000 kcal·d(− 1) and ~ 3000 kcal·d(− 1), respectively. As such, it is essential that adequate nutrition is provided to support training demands. However, to date, there is a paucity of data on habitual dietary intake of British Army recruits. The aims of this study were to: (i) compare habitual dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing Phase One training to Military Dietary Reference Values (MDRVs), and (ii) establish if there was a relative sex difference in dietary intake between men and women. METHOD: Researcher led weighed food records and food diaries were used to assess dietary intake in twenty-eight women (age 21.4 ± 3.0 yrs., height: 163.7 ± 5.0 cm, body mass 65.0 ± 6.7 kg), and seventeen men (age 20.4 ± 2.3 yrs., height: 178.0 ± 7.9 cm, body mass 74.6 ± 8.1 kg) at the Army Training Centre, Pirbright for 8-days in week ten of training. Macro and micronutrient content were estimated using dietary analysis software (Nutritics, Dublin) and assessed via an independent sample t-test to establish if there was a sex difference in daily energy, macro or micronutrient intakes. RESULTS: Estimated daily energy intake was less than the MDRV for both men and women, with men consuming a greater amount of energy compared with women (2846 ± 573 vs. 2207 ± 585 kcal·day(− 1), p < 0.001). Both sexes under consumed carbohydrate (CHO) when data was expressed relative to body mass with men consuming a greater amount than women (4.8 ± 1.3 vs. 3.8 ± 1.4 g·kg(− 1)·day(− 1), p = 0.025, ES = 0.74). Both sexes also failed to meet MDRVs for protein intake with men consuming more than women (1.5 ± 0.3 vs. 1.3 ± 0.3 g·kg(− 1)·day(− 1), p > 0.030, ES = 0.67). There were no differences in dietary fat intake between men and women (1.5 ± 0.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5 g·kg(− 1)·day(− 1), p = 0.483, ES = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Daily EI in men and women in Phase One training does not meet MDRVs. Interventions to increase macronutrient intakes should be considered along with research investigating the potential benefits for increasing different macronutrient intakes on training adaptations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6905050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69050502019-12-19 Sex differences in dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing phase one training Chapman, Shaun Roberts, Justin Smith, Lee Rawcliffe, Alex Izard, Rachel J Int Soc Sports Nutr Research Article BACKGROUND: British Army Phase One training exposes men and women to challenging distances of 13.5 km·d(− 1) vs. 11.8 km·d(− 1) and energy expenditures of ~ 4000 kcal·d(− 1) and ~ 3000 kcal·d(− 1), respectively. As such, it is essential that adequate nutrition is provided to support training demands. However, to date, there is a paucity of data on habitual dietary intake of British Army recruits. The aims of this study were to: (i) compare habitual dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing Phase One training to Military Dietary Reference Values (MDRVs), and (ii) establish if there was a relative sex difference in dietary intake between men and women. METHOD: Researcher led weighed food records and food diaries were used to assess dietary intake in twenty-eight women (age 21.4 ± 3.0 yrs., height: 163.7 ± 5.0 cm, body mass 65.0 ± 6.7 kg), and seventeen men (age 20.4 ± 2.3 yrs., height: 178.0 ± 7.9 cm, body mass 74.6 ± 8.1 kg) at the Army Training Centre, Pirbright for 8-days in week ten of training. Macro and micronutrient content were estimated using dietary analysis software (Nutritics, Dublin) and assessed via an independent sample t-test to establish if there was a sex difference in daily energy, macro or micronutrient intakes. RESULTS: Estimated daily energy intake was less than the MDRV for both men and women, with men consuming a greater amount of energy compared with women (2846 ± 573 vs. 2207 ± 585 kcal·day(− 1), p < 0.001). Both sexes under consumed carbohydrate (CHO) when data was expressed relative to body mass with men consuming a greater amount than women (4.8 ± 1.3 vs. 3.8 ± 1.4 g·kg(− 1)·day(− 1), p = 0.025, ES = 0.74). Both sexes also failed to meet MDRVs for protein intake with men consuming more than women (1.5 ± 0.3 vs. 1.3 ± 0.3 g·kg(− 1)·day(− 1), p > 0.030, ES = 0.67). There were no differences in dietary fat intake between men and women (1.5 ± 0.2 vs. 1.5 ± 0.5 g·kg(− 1)·day(− 1), p = 0.483, ES = 0.00). CONCLUSIONS: Daily EI in men and women in Phase One training does not meet MDRVs. Interventions to increase macronutrient intakes should be considered along with research investigating the potential benefits for increasing different macronutrient intakes on training adaptations. BioMed Central 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6905050/ /pubmed/31823790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-019-0327-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chapman, Shaun
Roberts, Justin
Smith, Lee
Rawcliffe, Alex
Izard, Rachel
Sex differences in dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing phase one training
title Sex differences in dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing phase one training
title_full Sex differences in dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing phase one training
title_fullStr Sex differences in dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing phase one training
title_full_unstemmed Sex differences in dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing phase one training
title_short Sex differences in dietary intake in British Army recruits undergoing phase one training
title_sort sex differences in dietary intake in british army recruits undergoing phase one training
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-019-0327-2
work_keys_str_mv AT chapmanshaun sexdifferencesindietaryintakeinbritisharmyrecruitsundergoingphaseonetraining
AT robertsjustin sexdifferencesindietaryintakeinbritisharmyrecruitsundergoingphaseonetraining
AT smithlee sexdifferencesindietaryintakeinbritisharmyrecruitsundergoingphaseonetraining
AT rawcliffealex sexdifferencesindietaryintakeinbritisharmyrecruitsundergoingphaseonetraining
AT izardrachel sexdifferencesindietaryintakeinbritisharmyrecruitsundergoingphaseonetraining