Cargando…

Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method

BACKGROUND: The presence of urinary fistula after ileal conduit urinary diversion is a challenging complication, and this study investigated the role of the intra-conduit negative pressure system (NPS) in the presence of urinary fistula following ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion as a conservativ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Yun-lin, Liang, Hai-tao, Tan, Lei, Zheng, Xia, Xiong, Dan, Xiao, Kang-hua, Qin, Zi-ke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0564-3
_version_ 1783478109259956224
author Ye, Yun-lin
Liang, Hai-tao
Tan, Lei
Zheng, Xia
Xiong, Dan
Xiao, Kang-hua
Qin, Zi-ke
author_facet Ye, Yun-lin
Liang, Hai-tao
Tan, Lei
Zheng, Xia
Xiong, Dan
Xiao, Kang-hua
Qin, Zi-ke
author_sort Ye, Yun-lin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The presence of urinary fistula after ileal conduit urinary diversion is a challenging complication, and this study investigated the role of the intra-conduit negative pressure system (NPS) in the presence of urinary fistula following ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion as a conservative treatment. METHODS: Using the intra-conduit NPS, a minor drainage tube was placed within a silicon tube to suck urine from the conduit with consistent negative pressure. Patients with urinary fistula following IC from August 2012 to July 2017 were recorded, and the clinical characteristics and outcome were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The intra-conduit NPS was used as a primarily conservative treatment for 13 patients who suffered from urinary fistula and presented with a large amount of abdominal/pelvic drainage without other significant morbidities. The median age was 60 years old (42–74 years), and 7patients were male. The median duration between the IC operation and the presence of urinary fistula was 15 days (2–28 days), and elevated creatinine levels were detected in the abdominal/pelvic drainage with a median level of 2114 μmol/L (636–388 μmol/L). A significant decrease in abdominal/pelvic drainage was identified in 12 patients. The median time that the NPS was used was 9 days (7–11 days). The other patient did not show any improvements after 2 days of observation and then underwent open surgery. With ureteral stenting, 2 abdominal drainage tubes and the intra-conduit NPS were placed during operation, no urine leakage was observed in the abdominal/pelvic field, and the patient was cured in 9 days. With a median follow-up of 22 months, no fistula recurrence or hydronephrosis was detected. CONCLUSION: The intra-conduit negative pressure system is a feasible and promising way to cure urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion. Because this procedure is a mini-invasive and simple approach, it might represent an alternative in selected patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6905099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69050992019-12-19 Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method Ye, Yun-lin Liang, Hai-tao Tan, Lei Zheng, Xia Xiong, Dan Xiao, Kang-hua Qin, Zi-ke BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: The presence of urinary fistula after ileal conduit urinary diversion is a challenging complication, and this study investigated the role of the intra-conduit negative pressure system (NPS) in the presence of urinary fistula following ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion as a conservative treatment. METHODS: Using the intra-conduit NPS, a minor drainage tube was placed within a silicon tube to suck urine from the conduit with consistent negative pressure. Patients with urinary fistula following IC from August 2012 to July 2017 were recorded, and the clinical characteristics and outcome were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The intra-conduit NPS was used as a primarily conservative treatment for 13 patients who suffered from urinary fistula and presented with a large amount of abdominal/pelvic drainage without other significant morbidities. The median age was 60 years old (42–74 years), and 7patients were male. The median duration between the IC operation and the presence of urinary fistula was 15 days (2–28 days), and elevated creatinine levels were detected in the abdominal/pelvic drainage with a median level of 2114 μmol/L (636–388 μmol/L). A significant decrease in abdominal/pelvic drainage was identified in 12 patients. The median time that the NPS was used was 9 days (7–11 days). The other patient did not show any improvements after 2 days of observation and then underwent open surgery. With ureteral stenting, 2 abdominal drainage tubes and the intra-conduit NPS were placed during operation, no urine leakage was observed in the abdominal/pelvic field, and the patient was cured in 9 days. With a median follow-up of 22 months, no fistula recurrence or hydronephrosis was detected. CONCLUSION: The intra-conduit negative pressure system is a feasible and promising way to cure urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion. Because this procedure is a mini-invasive and simple approach, it might represent an alternative in selected patients. BioMed Central 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6905099/ /pubmed/31823766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0564-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ye, Yun-lin
Liang, Hai-tao
Tan, Lei
Zheng, Xia
Xiong, Dan
Xiao, Kang-hua
Qin, Zi-ke
Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method
title Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method
title_full Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method
title_fullStr Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method
title_full_unstemmed Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method
title_short Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method
title_sort conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823766
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0564-3
work_keys_str_mv AT yeyunlin conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod
AT lianghaitao conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod
AT tanlei conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod
AT zhengxia conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod
AT xiongdan conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod
AT xiaokanghua conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod
AT qinzike conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod