Cargando…
Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method
BACKGROUND: The presence of urinary fistula after ileal conduit urinary diversion is a challenging complication, and this study investigated the role of the intra-conduit negative pressure system (NPS) in the presence of urinary fistula following ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion as a conservativ...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0564-3 |
_version_ | 1783478109259956224 |
---|---|
author | Ye, Yun-lin Liang, Hai-tao Tan, Lei Zheng, Xia Xiong, Dan Xiao, Kang-hua Qin, Zi-ke |
author_facet | Ye, Yun-lin Liang, Hai-tao Tan, Lei Zheng, Xia Xiong, Dan Xiao, Kang-hua Qin, Zi-ke |
author_sort | Ye, Yun-lin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The presence of urinary fistula after ileal conduit urinary diversion is a challenging complication, and this study investigated the role of the intra-conduit negative pressure system (NPS) in the presence of urinary fistula following ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion as a conservative treatment. METHODS: Using the intra-conduit NPS, a minor drainage tube was placed within a silicon tube to suck urine from the conduit with consistent negative pressure. Patients with urinary fistula following IC from August 2012 to July 2017 were recorded, and the clinical characteristics and outcome were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The intra-conduit NPS was used as a primarily conservative treatment for 13 patients who suffered from urinary fistula and presented with a large amount of abdominal/pelvic drainage without other significant morbidities. The median age was 60 years old (42–74 years), and 7patients were male. The median duration between the IC operation and the presence of urinary fistula was 15 days (2–28 days), and elevated creatinine levels were detected in the abdominal/pelvic drainage with a median level of 2114 μmol/L (636–388 μmol/L). A significant decrease in abdominal/pelvic drainage was identified in 12 patients. The median time that the NPS was used was 9 days (7–11 days). The other patient did not show any improvements after 2 days of observation and then underwent open surgery. With ureteral stenting, 2 abdominal drainage tubes and the intra-conduit NPS were placed during operation, no urine leakage was observed in the abdominal/pelvic field, and the patient was cured in 9 days. With a median follow-up of 22 months, no fistula recurrence or hydronephrosis was detected. CONCLUSION: The intra-conduit negative pressure system is a feasible and promising way to cure urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion. Because this procedure is a mini-invasive and simple approach, it might represent an alternative in selected patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6905099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69050992019-12-19 Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method Ye, Yun-lin Liang, Hai-tao Tan, Lei Zheng, Xia Xiong, Dan Xiao, Kang-hua Qin, Zi-ke BMC Urol Research Article BACKGROUND: The presence of urinary fistula after ileal conduit urinary diversion is a challenging complication, and this study investigated the role of the intra-conduit negative pressure system (NPS) in the presence of urinary fistula following ileal conduit (IC) urinary diversion as a conservative treatment. METHODS: Using the intra-conduit NPS, a minor drainage tube was placed within a silicon tube to suck urine from the conduit with consistent negative pressure. Patients with urinary fistula following IC from August 2012 to July 2017 were recorded, and the clinical characteristics and outcome were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The intra-conduit NPS was used as a primarily conservative treatment for 13 patients who suffered from urinary fistula and presented with a large amount of abdominal/pelvic drainage without other significant morbidities. The median age was 60 years old (42–74 years), and 7patients were male. The median duration between the IC operation and the presence of urinary fistula was 15 days (2–28 days), and elevated creatinine levels were detected in the abdominal/pelvic drainage with a median level of 2114 μmol/L (636–388 μmol/L). A significant decrease in abdominal/pelvic drainage was identified in 12 patients. The median time that the NPS was used was 9 days (7–11 days). The other patient did not show any improvements after 2 days of observation and then underwent open surgery. With ureteral stenting, 2 abdominal drainage tubes and the intra-conduit NPS were placed during operation, no urine leakage was observed in the abdominal/pelvic field, and the patient was cured in 9 days. With a median follow-up of 22 months, no fistula recurrence or hydronephrosis was detected. CONCLUSION: The intra-conduit negative pressure system is a feasible and promising way to cure urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion. Because this procedure is a mini-invasive and simple approach, it might represent an alternative in selected patients. BioMed Central 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6905099/ /pubmed/31823766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0564-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ye, Yun-lin Liang, Hai-tao Tan, Lei Zheng, Xia Xiong, Dan Xiao, Kang-hua Qin, Zi-ke Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method |
title | Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method |
title_full | Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method |
title_fullStr | Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method |
title_full_unstemmed | Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method |
title_short | Conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method |
title_sort | conservative treatment for urinary fistula following ileal conduit urinary diversion: a simple method |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31823766 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12894-019-0564-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yeyunlin conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod AT lianghaitao conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod AT tanlei conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod AT zhengxia conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod AT xiongdan conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod AT xiaokanghua conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod AT qinzike conservativetreatmentforurinaryfistulafollowingilealconduiturinarydiversionasimplemethod |