Cargando…

Comparison of Gold Yield with Traditional Amalgamation and Direct Smelting in Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining in Uganda

BACKGROUND. The amalgamation method used by artisanal small-scale miners is the single largest source of global mercury emission. The goal of the ‘Free Your Mine’ project is to stop mercury use in artisanal and small-scale mining. OBJECTIVES. The aim of the present study was to compare gold recovery...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoffersen, Birgitte, Køster-Rasmussen, Rasmus, Cardeño, Jorge Ivan Contreras, Appel, Peter W.U., Smidth, Margrethe, Na-Oy, Leoncio D., Lardizabal, Debbie Libua, Onos, Rudy W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Black Smith Institute 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893166
http://dx.doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-9.24.191205
_version_ 1783478115126738944
author Stoffersen, Birgitte
Køster-Rasmussen, Rasmus
Cardeño, Jorge Ivan Contreras
Appel, Peter W.U.
Smidth, Margrethe
Na-Oy, Leoncio D.
Lardizabal, Debbie Libua
Onos, Rudy W.
author_facet Stoffersen, Birgitte
Køster-Rasmussen, Rasmus
Cardeño, Jorge Ivan Contreras
Appel, Peter W.U.
Smidth, Margrethe
Na-Oy, Leoncio D.
Lardizabal, Debbie Libua
Onos, Rudy W.
author_sort Stoffersen, Birgitte
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. The amalgamation method used by artisanal small-scale miners is the single largest source of global mercury emission. The goal of the ‘Free Your Mine’ project is to stop mercury use in artisanal and small-scale mining. OBJECTIVES. The aim of the present study was to compare gold recovery and time consumption between the amalgamation method and direct smelting, using borax for smelting under standardized conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This was an experimental study in a pragmatic setting in the mining community of Tiira, Uganda. Standardized amounts of gold ore of equal quality were processed with the local amalgamation method and with the Philippine mercury-free method as practiced by miners from Benguet in the Philippines, and the gold yield and time consumption were compared. RESULTS. The amalgamation method took 53 minutes and recovered 1.0 g of pure gold. The miners used 4 g of mercury in the processing. The Philippine mercury-free method took 62 minutes and recovered 1.4 g of pure gold. CONCLUSIONS. The Philippine mercury-free method recovered 40% more gold than the amalgamation method but took 9 minutes longer. The Philippine mercury-free method is a viable alternative to amalgamation. COMPETING INTERESTS. The authors declare no competing financial interests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6905143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Black Smith Institute
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69051432019-12-31 Comparison of Gold Yield with Traditional Amalgamation and Direct Smelting in Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining in Uganda Stoffersen, Birgitte Køster-Rasmussen, Rasmus Cardeño, Jorge Ivan Contreras Appel, Peter W.U. Smidth, Margrethe Na-Oy, Leoncio D. Lardizabal, Debbie Libua Onos, Rudy W. J Health Pollut Case Study BACKGROUND. The amalgamation method used by artisanal small-scale miners is the single largest source of global mercury emission. The goal of the ‘Free Your Mine’ project is to stop mercury use in artisanal and small-scale mining. OBJECTIVES. The aim of the present study was to compare gold recovery and time consumption between the amalgamation method and direct smelting, using borax for smelting under standardized conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS. This was an experimental study in a pragmatic setting in the mining community of Tiira, Uganda. Standardized amounts of gold ore of equal quality were processed with the local amalgamation method and with the Philippine mercury-free method as practiced by miners from Benguet in the Philippines, and the gold yield and time consumption were compared. RESULTS. The amalgamation method took 53 minutes and recovered 1.0 g of pure gold. The miners used 4 g of mercury in the processing. The Philippine mercury-free method took 62 minutes and recovered 1.4 g of pure gold. CONCLUSIONS. The Philippine mercury-free method recovered 40% more gold than the amalgamation method but took 9 minutes longer. The Philippine mercury-free method is a viable alternative to amalgamation. COMPETING INTERESTS. The authors declare no competing financial interests. Black Smith Institute 2019-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6905143/ /pubmed/31893166 http://dx.doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-9.24.191205 Text en © Pure Earth 2019 This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Case Study
Stoffersen, Birgitte
Køster-Rasmussen, Rasmus
Cardeño, Jorge Ivan Contreras
Appel, Peter W.U.
Smidth, Margrethe
Na-Oy, Leoncio D.
Lardizabal, Debbie Libua
Onos, Rudy W.
Comparison of Gold Yield with Traditional Amalgamation and Direct Smelting in Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining in Uganda
title Comparison of Gold Yield with Traditional Amalgamation and Direct Smelting in Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining in Uganda
title_full Comparison of Gold Yield with Traditional Amalgamation and Direct Smelting in Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining in Uganda
title_fullStr Comparison of Gold Yield with Traditional Amalgamation and Direct Smelting in Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining in Uganda
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Gold Yield with Traditional Amalgamation and Direct Smelting in Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining in Uganda
title_short Comparison of Gold Yield with Traditional Amalgamation and Direct Smelting in Artisanal Small-Scale Gold Mining in Uganda
title_sort comparison of gold yield with traditional amalgamation and direct smelting in artisanal small-scale gold mining in uganda
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31893166
http://dx.doi.org/10.5696/2156-9614-9.24.191205
work_keys_str_mv AT stoffersenbirgitte comparisonofgoldyieldwithtraditionalamalgamationanddirectsmeltinginartisanalsmallscalegoldmininginuganda
AT køsterrasmussenrasmus comparisonofgoldyieldwithtraditionalamalgamationanddirectsmeltinginartisanalsmallscalegoldmininginuganda
AT cardenojorgeivancontreras comparisonofgoldyieldwithtraditionalamalgamationanddirectsmeltinginartisanalsmallscalegoldmininginuganda
AT appelpeterwu comparisonofgoldyieldwithtraditionalamalgamationanddirectsmeltinginartisanalsmallscalegoldmininginuganda
AT smidthmargrethe comparisonofgoldyieldwithtraditionalamalgamationanddirectsmeltinginartisanalsmallscalegoldmininginuganda
AT naoyleonciod comparisonofgoldyieldwithtraditionalamalgamationanddirectsmeltinginartisanalsmallscalegoldmininginuganda
AT lardizabaldebbielibua comparisonofgoldyieldwithtraditionalamalgamationanddirectsmeltinginartisanalsmallscalegoldmininginuganda
AT onosrudyw comparisonofgoldyieldwithtraditionalamalgamationanddirectsmeltinginartisanalsmallscalegoldmininginuganda