Cargando…

Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study

AIM: This study was conducted to compare smear layer removal by five different irrigation techniques—conventional needle irrigation (CI), manual dynamic activation (MDA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), sonic irrigation (SI), and negative apical pressure (NAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty fres...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jasrotia, Ankush, Bhagat, Kanchan, Bhagat, Neeru, Bhagat, Ravinder K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039084
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_267_19
_version_ 1783478145036320768
author Jasrotia, Ankush
Bhagat, Kanchan
Bhagat, Neeru
Bhagat, Ravinder K.
author_facet Jasrotia, Ankush
Bhagat, Kanchan
Bhagat, Neeru
Bhagat, Ravinder K.
author_sort Jasrotia, Ankush
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study was conducted to compare smear layer removal by five different irrigation techniques—conventional needle irrigation (CI), manual dynamic activation (MDA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), sonic irrigation (SI), and negative apical pressure (NAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty freshly extracted mandibular first premolars were cleaned and shaped by One Curve rotary files and 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. The samples were divided into five equal groups (n = 10), according to the final irrigation activation technique: Group I, CI; Group II, MDA; Group III, PUI; Group IV, SI; and Group V, NAP. The samples were prepared and observed under a scanning electron microscope. The photomicrographs were recorded and evaluated with a scoring system. RESULTS: Group I and Group II had the highest scores, which showed a statistically significant difference between the other groups (P < 0.05). This was followed by PUI, NAP, and SI. CONCLUSION: Final irrigation activation with SI and NAP resulted in the better removal of smear layer when compared to that with other groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6905312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69053122020-02-07 Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study Jasrotia, Ankush Bhagat, Kanchan Bhagat, Neeru Bhagat, Ravinder K. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article AIM: This study was conducted to compare smear layer removal by five different irrigation techniques—conventional needle irrigation (CI), manual dynamic activation (MDA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), sonic irrigation (SI), and negative apical pressure (NAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty freshly extracted mandibular first premolars were cleaned and shaped by One Curve rotary files and 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. The samples were divided into five equal groups (n = 10), according to the final irrigation activation technique: Group I, CI; Group II, MDA; Group III, PUI; Group IV, SI; and Group V, NAP. The samples were prepared and observed under a scanning electron microscope. The photomicrographs were recorded and evaluated with a scoring system. RESULTS: Group I and Group II had the highest scores, which showed a statistically significant difference between the other groups (P < 0.05). This was followed by PUI, NAP, and SI. CONCLUSION: Final irrigation activation with SI and NAP resulted in the better removal of smear layer when compared to that with other groups. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6905312/ /pubmed/32039084 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_267_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jasrotia, Ankush
Bhagat, Kanchan
Bhagat, Neeru
Bhagat, Ravinder K.
Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_full Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_fullStr Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_short Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
title_sort comparison of five different irrigation techniques on smear layer removal in apical thirds of root canals of mandibular first premolar: a scanning electron microscopic study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039084
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_267_19
work_keys_str_mv AT jasrotiaankush comparisonoffivedifferentirrigationtechniquesonsmearlayerremovalinapicalthirdsofrootcanalsofmandibularfirstpremolarascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT bhagatkanchan comparisonoffivedifferentirrigationtechniquesonsmearlayerremovalinapicalthirdsofrootcanalsofmandibularfirstpremolarascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT bhagatneeru comparisonoffivedifferentirrigationtechniquesonsmearlayerremovalinapicalthirdsofrootcanalsofmandibularfirstpremolarascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy
AT bhagatravinderk comparisonoffivedifferentirrigationtechniquesonsmearlayerremovalinapicalthirdsofrootcanalsofmandibularfirstpremolarascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy