Cargando…
Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study
AIM: This study was conducted to compare smear layer removal by five different irrigation techniques—conventional needle irrigation (CI), manual dynamic activation (MDA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), sonic irrigation (SI), and negative apical pressure (NAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty fres...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039084 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_267_19 |
_version_ | 1783478145036320768 |
---|---|
author | Jasrotia, Ankush Bhagat, Kanchan Bhagat, Neeru Bhagat, Ravinder K. |
author_facet | Jasrotia, Ankush Bhagat, Kanchan Bhagat, Neeru Bhagat, Ravinder K. |
author_sort | Jasrotia, Ankush |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: This study was conducted to compare smear layer removal by five different irrigation techniques—conventional needle irrigation (CI), manual dynamic activation (MDA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), sonic irrigation (SI), and negative apical pressure (NAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty freshly extracted mandibular first premolars were cleaned and shaped by One Curve rotary files and 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. The samples were divided into five equal groups (n = 10), according to the final irrigation activation technique: Group I, CI; Group II, MDA; Group III, PUI; Group IV, SI; and Group V, NAP. The samples were prepared and observed under a scanning electron microscope. The photomicrographs were recorded and evaluated with a scoring system. RESULTS: Group I and Group II had the highest scores, which showed a statistically significant difference between the other groups (P < 0.05). This was followed by PUI, NAP, and SI. CONCLUSION: Final irrigation activation with SI and NAP resulted in the better removal of smear layer when compared to that with other groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6905312 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69053122020-02-07 Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study Jasrotia, Ankush Bhagat, Kanchan Bhagat, Neeru Bhagat, Ravinder K. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent Original Article AIM: This study was conducted to compare smear layer removal by five different irrigation techniques—conventional needle irrigation (CI), manual dynamic activation (MDA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), sonic irrigation (SI), and negative apical pressure (NAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty freshly extracted mandibular first premolars were cleaned and shaped by One Curve rotary files and 3% sodium hypochlorite and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. The samples were divided into five equal groups (n = 10), according to the final irrigation activation technique: Group I, CI; Group II, MDA; Group III, PUI; Group IV, SI; and Group V, NAP. The samples were prepared and observed under a scanning electron microscope. The photomicrographs were recorded and evaluated with a scoring system. RESULTS: Group I and Group II had the highest scores, which showed a statistically significant difference between the other groups (P < 0.05). This was followed by PUI, NAP, and SI. CONCLUSION: Final irrigation activation with SI and NAP resulted in the better removal of smear layer when compared to that with other groups. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC6905312/ /pubmed/32039084 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_267_19 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jasrotia, Ankush Bhagat, Kanchan Bhagat, Neeru Bhagat, Ravinder K. Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study |
title | Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study |
title_full | Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study |
title_short | Comparison of Five Different Irrigation Techniques on Smear Layer Removal in Apical Thirds of Root Canals of Mandibular First Premolar: A Scanning Electron Microscopic Study |
title_sort | comparison of five different irrigation techniques on smear layer removal in apical thirds of root canals of mandibular first premolar: a scanning electron microscopic study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905312/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32039084 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_267_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jasrotiaankush comparisonoffivedifferentirrigationtechniquesonsmearlayerremovalinapicalthirdsofrootcanalsofmandibularfirstpremolarascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy AT bhagatkanchan comparisonoffivedifferentirrigationtechniquesonsmearlayerremovalinapicalthirdsofrootcanalsofmandibularfirstpremolarascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy AT bhagatneeru comparisonoffivedifferentirrigationtechniquesonsmearlayerremovalinapicalthirdsofrootcanalsofmandibularfirstpremolarascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy AT bhagatravinderk comparisonoffivedifferentirrigationtechniquesonsmearlayerremovalinapicalthirdsofrootcanalsofmandibularfirstpremolarascanningelectronmicroscopicstudy |