Cargando…
Clinical reasoning – an approach for decision-making in education and training for biomedical scientists
Aim: Explicitly addressing clinical reasoning (CR) is seen as a promising opportunity in the teaching of the biomedical sciences to enable students to acquire the skills to meet the challenges posed by ever more complex health care processes. The quality of diagnostic decisions plays an essential ro...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001289 |
_version_ | 1783478157598261248 |
---|---|
author | Homberg, Angelika Oberhauser, Heidi Kaap-Fröhlich, Sylvia |
author_facet | Homberg, Angelika Oberhauser, Heidi Kaap-Fröhlich, Sylvia |
author_sort | Homberg, Angelika |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aim: Explicitly addressing clinical reasoning (CR) is seen as a promising opportunity in the teaching of the biomedical sciences to enable students to acquire the skills to meet the challenges posed by ever more complex health care processes. The quality of diagnostic decisions plays an essential role here. Our aim is to examine if biomedical scientists recognize the practical relevance of CR and are able to apply it as a reflective framework for their professional practice. Method: In two different educational settings, biomedical science students were asked to look closely at CR in the context of the degree program and to indentify the different forms of reasoning used in their internships and professional practice. The written descriptions were analyzed for content and discussed in the seminars. Results: In both scenarios, the analyses of the students’ descriptions and discussions showed that examining the different forms of CR helped to raise conscious awareness of thought and decision-making processes, encouraging students to think critically about them and to articulate insights about them, as well as recognize the importance of different reasoning strategies when making specific medical decisions. Conclusion: CR for biomedical scientists could help make decision-making processes visible for other occupational groups and thus advantageously integrate specific professional expertise into health care. Over the long term, an interdisciplinary focus on CR could foster and promote the development of a shared discourse and interprofessional collaboration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6905367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | German Medical Science GMS Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69053672019-12-16 Clinical reasoning – an approach for decision-making in education and training for biomedical scientists Homberg, Angelika Oberhauser, Heidi Kaap-Fröhlich, Sylvia GMS J Med Educ Article Aim: Explicitly addressing clinical reasoning (CR) is seen as a promising opportunity in the teaching of the biomedical sciences to enable students to acquire the skills to meet the challenges posed by ever more complex health care processes. The quality of diagnostic decisions plays an essential role here. Our aim is to examine if biomedical scientists recognize the practical relevance of CR and are able to apply it as a reflective framework for their professional practice. Method: In two different educational settings, biomedical science students were asked to look closely at CR in the context of the degree program and to indentify the different forms of reasoning used in their internships and professional practice. The written descriptions were analyzed for content and discussed in the seminars. Results: In both scenarios, the analyses of the students’ descriptions and discussions showed that examining the different forms of CR helped to raise conscious awareness of thought and decision-making processes, encouraging students to think critically about them and to articulate insights about them, as well as recognize the importance of different reasoning strategies when making specific medical decisions. Conclusion: CR for biomedical scientists could help make decision-making processes visible for other occupational groups and thus advantageously integrate specific professional expertise into health care. Over the long term, an interdisciplinary focus on CR could foster and promote the development of a shared discourse and interprofessional collaboration. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2019-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC6905367/ /pubmed/31844653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001289 Text en Copyright © 2019 Homberg et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Homberg, Angelika Oberhauser, Heidi Kaap-Fröhlich, Sylvia Clinical reasoning – an approach for decision-making in education and training for biomedical scientists |
title | Clinical reasoning – an approach for decision-making in education and training for biomedical scientists |
title_full | Clinical reasoning – an approach for decision-making in education and training for biomedical scientists |
title_fullStr | Clinical reasoning – an approach for decision-making in education and training for biomedical scientists |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical reasoning – an approach for decision-making in education and training for biomedical scientists |
title_short | Clinical reasoning – an approach for decision-making in education and training for biomedical scientists |
title_sort | clinical reasoning – an approach for decision-making in education and training for biomedical scientists |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma001289 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hombergangelika clinicalreasoninganapproachfordecisionmakingineducationandtrainingforbiomedicalscientists AT oberhauserheidi clinicalreasoninganapproachfordecisionmakingineducationandtrainingforbiomedicalscientists AT kaapfrohlichsylvia clinicalreasoninganapproachfordecisionmakingineducationandtrainingforbiomedicalscientists |