Cargando…
Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes
Sharka, a common disease among most stone fruit crops, is caused by the Plum Pox Virus (PPV). Resistant genotypes have been found in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), one of which—the cultivar ‘Lito’ heterozygous for the resistance—has been used to map a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on linkage...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31867032 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01576 |
_version_ | 1783478159455289344 |
---|---|
author | De Mori, Gloria Falchi, Rachele Testolin, Raffaele Bassi, Daniele Savazzini, Federica Dondini, Luca Tartarini, Stefano Palmisano, Francesco Minafra, Angelantonio Spadotto, Alessandro Scalabrin, Simone Geuna, Filippo |
author_facet | De Mori, Gloria Falchi, Rachele Testolin, Raffaele Bassi, Daniele Savazzini, Federica Dondini, Luca Tartarini, Stefano Palmisano, Francesco Minafra, Angelantonio Spadotto, Alessandro Scalabrin, Simone Geuna, Filippo |
author_sort | De Mori, Gloria |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sharka, a common disease among most stone fruit crops, is caused by the Plum Pox Virus (PPV). Resistant genotypes have been found in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), one of which—the cultivar ‘Lito’ heterozygous for the resistance—has been used to map a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on linkage group 1, following a pseudo-test-cross mating design with 231 individuals. In addition, 19 SNP markers were selected from among the hundreds previously developed, which allowed the region to be limited to 236 kb on chromosome 1. A ‘Lito’ bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library was produced, screened with markers of the region, and positive BAC clones were sequenced. Resistant (R) and susceptible (S) haplotypes were assembled independently. To refine the assembly, the whole genome of ‘Lito’ was sequenced to high coverage (98×) using PacBio technology, enabling the development of a detailed assembly of the region that was able to predict and annotate the genes in the QTL region. The selected cultivar ‘Lito’ allowed not only to discriminate structural variants between the two haplotypic regions but also to distinguish specific allele expression, contributing towards mining the PPVres locus. In light of these findings, genes previously indicated (i.e., MATHd genes) to have a possible role in PPV resistance were further analyzed, and new candidates were discussed. Although the results are not conclusive, the accurate and independent assembly of R and S haplotypes of ‘Lito’ is a valuable resource to predict and test alternative transcription and regulation mechanisms underpinning PPV resistance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6905379 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69053792019-12-20 Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes De Mori, Gloria Falchi, Rachele Testolin, Raffaele Bassi, Daniele Savazzini, Federica Dondini, Luca Tartarini, Stefano Palmisano, Francesco Minafra, Angelantonio Spadotto, Alessandro Scalabrin, Simone Geuna, Filippo Front Plant Sci Plant Science Sharka, a common disease among most stone fruit crops, is caused by the Plum Pox Virus (PPV). Resistant genotypes have been found in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), one of which—the cultivar ‘Lito’ heterozygous for the resistance—has been used to map a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on linkage group 1, following a pseudo-test-cross mating design with 231 individuals. In addition, 19 SNP markers were selected from among the hundreds previously developed, which allowed the region to be limited to 236 kb on chromosome 1. A ‘Lito’ bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library was produced, screened with markers of the region, and positive BAC clones were sequenced. Resistant (R) and susceptible (S) haplotypes were assembled independently. To refine the assembly, the whole genome of ‘Lito’ was sequenced to high coverage (98×) using PacBio technology, enabling the development of a detailed assembly of the region that was able to predict and annotate the genes in the QTL region. The selected cultivar ‘Lito’ allowed not only to discriminate structural variants between the two haplotypic regions but also to distinguish specific allele expression, contributing towards mining the PPVres locus. In light of these findings, genes previously indicated (i.e., MATHd genes) to have a possible role in PPV resistance were further analyzed, and new candidates were discussed. Although the results are not conclusive, the accurate and independent assembly of R and S haplotypes of ‘Lito’ is a valuable resource to predict and test alternative transcription and regulation mechanisms underpinning PPV resistance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6905379/ /pubmed/31867032 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01576 Text en Copyright © 2019 De Mori, Falchi, Testolin, Bassi, Savazzini, Dondini, Tartarini, Palmisano, Minafra, Spadotto, Scalabrin and Geuna http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Plant Science De Mori, Gloria Falchi, Rachele Testolin, Raffaele Bassi, Daniele Savazzini, Federica Dondini, Luca Tartarini, Stefano Palmisano, Francesco Minafra, Angelantonio Spadotto, Alessandro Scalabrin, Simone Geuna, Filippo Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes |
title | Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes |
title_full | Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes |
title_fullStr | Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes |
title_full_unstemmed | Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes |
title_short | Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes |
title_sort | resistance to sharka in apricot: comparison of phase-reconstructed resistant and susceptible haplotypes of ‘lito’ chromosome 1 and analysis of candidate genes |
topic | Plant Science |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905379/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31867032 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01576 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT demorigloria resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes AT falchirachele resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes AT testolinraffaele resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes AT bassidaniele resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes AT savazzinifederica resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes AT dondiniluca resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes AT tartarinistefano resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes AT palmisanofrancesco resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes AT minafraangelantonio resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes AT spadottoalessandro resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes AT scalabrinsimone resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes AT geunafilippo resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes |