Cargando…

Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes

Sharka, a common disease among most stone fruit crops, is caused by the Plum Pox Virus (PPV). Resistant genotypes have been found in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), one of which—the cultivar ‘Lito’ heterozygous for the resistance—has been used to map a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on linkage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Mori, Gloria, Falchi, Rachele, Testolin, Raffaele, Bassi, Daniele, Savazzini, Federica, Dondini, Luca, Tartarini, Stefano, Palmisano, Francesco, Minafra, Angelantonio, Spadotto, Alessandro, Scalabrin, Simone, Geuna, Filippo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31867032
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01576
_version_ 1783478159455289344
author De Mori, Gloria
Falchi, Rachele
Testolin, Raffaele
Bassi, Daniele
Savazzini, Federica
Dondini, Luca
Tartarini, Stefano
Palmisano, Francesco
Minafra, Angelantonio
Spadotto, Alessandro
Scalabrin, Simone
Geuna, Filippo
author_facet De Mori, Gloria
Falchi, Rachele
Testolin, Raffaele
Bassi, Daniele
Savazzini, Federica
Dondini, Luca
Tartarini, Stefano
Palmisano, Francesco
Minafra, Angelantonio
Spadotto, Alessandro
Scalabrin, Simone
Geuna, Filippo
author_sort De Mori, Gloria
collection PubMed
description Sharka, a common disease among most stone fruit crops, is caused by the Plum Pox Virus (PPV). Resistant genotypes have been found in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), one of which—the cultivar ‘Lito’ heterozygous for the resistance—has been used to map a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on linkage group 1, following a pseudo-test-cross mating design with 231 individuals. In addition, 19 SNP markers were selected from among the hundreds previously developed, which allowed the region to be limited to 236 kb on chromosome 1. A ‘Lito’ bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library was produced, screened with markers of the region, and positive BAC clones were sequenced. Resistant (R) and susceptible (S) haplotypes were assembled independently. To refine the assembly, the whole genome of ‘Lito’ was sequenced to high coverage (98×) using PacBio technology, enabling the development of a detailed assembly of the region that was able to predict and annotate the genes in the QTL region. The selected cultivar ‘Lito’ allowed not only to discriminate structural variants between the two haplotypic regions but also to distinguish specific allele expression, contributing towards mining the PPVres locus. In light of these findings, genes previously indicated (i.e., MATHd genes) to have a possible role in PPV resistance were further analyzed, and new candidates were discussed. Although the results are not conclusive, the accurate and independent assembly of R and S haplotypes of ‘Lito’ is a valuable resource to predict and test alternative transcription and regulation mechanisms underpinning PPV resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6905379
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69053792019-12-20 Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes De Mori, Gloria Falchi, Rachele Testolin, Raffaele Bassi, Daniele Savazzini, Federica Dondini, Luca Tartarini, Stefano Palmisano, Francesco Minafra, Angelantonio Spadotto, Alessandro Scalabrin, Simone Geuna, Filippo Front Plant Sci Plant Science Sharka, a common disease among most stone fruit crops, is caused by the Plum Pox Virus (PPV). Resistant genotypes have been found in apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.), one of which—the cultivar ‘Lito’ heterozygous for the resistance—has been used to map a major quantitative trait locus (QTL) on linkage group 1, following a pseudo-test-cross mating design with 231 individuals. In addition, 19 SNP markers were selected from among the hundreds previously developed, which allowed the region to be limited to 236 kb on chromosome 1. A ‘Lito’ bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) library was produced, screened with markers of the region, and positive BAC clones were sequenced. Resistant (R) and susceptible (S) haplotypes were assembled independently. To refine the assembly, the whole genome of ‘Lito’ was sequenced to high coverage (98×) using PacBio technology, enabling the development of a detailed assembly of the region that was able to predict and annotate the genes in the QTL region. The selected cultivar ‘Lito’ allowed not only to discriminate structural variants between the two haplotypic regions but also to distinguish specific allele expression, contributing towards mining the PPVres locus. In light of these findings, genes previously indicated (i.e., MATHd genes) to have a possible role in PPV resistance were further analyzed, and new candidates were discussed. Although the results are not conclusive, the accurate and independent assembly of R and S haplotypes of ‘Lito’ is a valuable resource to predict and test alternative transcription and regulation mechanisms underpinning PPV resistance. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6905379/ /pubmed/31867032 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01576 Text en Copyright © 2019 De Mori, Falchi, Testolin, Bassi, Savazzini, Dondini, Tartarini, Palmisano, Minafra, Spadotto, Scalabrin and Geuna http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
De Mori, Gloria
Falchi, Rachele
Testolin, Raffaele
Bassi, Daniele
Savazzini, Federica
Dondini, Luca
Tartarini, Stefano
Palmisano, Francesco
Minafra, Angelantonio
Spadotto, Alessandro
Scalabrin, Simone
Geuna, Filippo
Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes
title Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes
title_full Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes
title_fullStr Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes
title_full_unstemmed Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes
title_short Resistance to Sharka in Apricot: Comparison of Phase-Reconstructed Resistant and Susceptible Haplotypes of ‘Lito’ Chromosome 1 and Analysis of Candidate Genes
title_sort resistance to sharka in apricot: comparison of phase-reconstructed resistant and susceptible haplotypes of ‘lito’ chromosome 1 and analysis of candidate genes
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6905379/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31867032
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01576
work_keys_str_mv AT demorigloria resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes
AT falchirachele resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes
AT testolinraffaele resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes
AT bassidaniele resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes
AT savazzinifederica resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes
AT dondiniluca resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes
AT tartarinistefano resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes
AT palmisanofrancesco resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes
AT minafraangelantonio resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes
AT spadottoalessandro resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes
AT scalabrinsimone resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes
AT geunafilippo resistancetosharkainapricotcomparisonofphasereconstructedresistantandsusceptiblehaplotypesoflitochromosome1andanalysisofcandidategenes