Cargando…

Pelvic floor pressure distribution profile in urinary incontinence: a classification study with feature selection

BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor pressure distribution profiles, obtained by a novel instrumented non-deformable probe, were used as the input to a feature extraction, selection, and classification approach to test their potential for an automatic diagnostic system for objective female urinary incontinence...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carafini, Adriano, Sacco, Isabel C.N., Vieira, Marcus Fraga
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844587
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8207
_version_ 1783478478795964416
author Carafini, Adriano
Sacco, Isabel C.N.
Vieira, Marcus Fraga
author_facet Carafini, Adriano
Sacco, Isabel C.N.
Vieira, Marcus Fraga
author_sort Carafini, Adriano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor pressure distribution profiles, obtained by a novel instrumented non-deformable probe, were used as the input to a feature extraction, selection, and classification approach to test their potential for an automatic diagnostic system for objective female urinary incontinence assessment. We tested the performance of different feature selection approaches and different classifiers, as well as sought to establish the group of features that provides the greatest discrimination capability between continent and incontinent women. METHODS: The available data for evaluation consisted of intravaginal spatiotemporal pressure profiles acquired from 24 continent and 24 incontinent women while performing four pelvic floor maneuvers: the maximum contraction maneuver, Valsalva maneuver, endurance maneuver, and wave maneuver. Feature extraction was guided by previous studies on the characterization of pressure profiles in the vaginal canal, where the extracted features were tested concerning their repeatability. Feature selection was achieved through a combination of a ranking method and a complete non-exhaustive subset search algorithm: branch and bound and recursive feature elimination. Three classifiers were tested: k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), support vector machine, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the classifiers employed, there was not one that outperformed the others; however, k-NN presented statistical inferiority in one of the maneuvers. The best result was obtained through the application of recursive feature elimination on the features extracted from all the maneuvers, resulting in 77.1% test accuracy, 74.1% precision, and 83.3 recall, using SVM. Moreover, the best feature subset, obtained by observing the selection frequency of every single feature during the application of branch and bound, was directly employed on the classification, thus reaching 95.8% accuracy. Although not at the level required by an automatic system, the results show the potential use of pelvic floor pressure distribution profiles data and provide insights into the pelvic floor functioning aspects that contribute to urinary incontinence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6907092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69070922019-12-16 Pelvic floor pressure distribution profile in urinary incontinence: a classification study with feature selection Carafini, Adriano Sacco, Isabel C.N. Vieira, Marcus Fraga PeerJ Bioinformatics BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor pressure distribution profiles, obtained by a novel instrumented non-deformable probe, were used as the input to a feature extraction, selection, and classification approach to test their potential for an automatic diagnostic system for objective female urinary incontinence assessment. We tested the performance of different feature selection approaches and different classifiers, as well as sought to establish the group of features that provides the greatest discrimination capability between continent and incontinent women. METHODS: The available data for evaluation consisted of intravaginal spatiotemporal pressure profiles acquired from 24 continent and 24 incontinent women while performing four pelvic floor maneuvers: the maximum contraction maneuver, Valsalva maneuver, endurance maneuver, and wave maneuver. Feature extraction was guided by previous studies on the characterization of pressure profiles in the vaginal canal, where the extracted features were tested concerning their repeatability. Feature selection was achieved through a combination of a ranking method and a complete non-exhaustive subset search algorithm: branch and bound and recursive feature elimination. Three classifiers were tested: k-nearest neighbors (k-NN), support vector machine, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the classifiers employed, there was not one that outperformed the others; however, k-NN presented statistical inferiority in one of the maneuvers. The best result was obtained through the application of recursive feature elimination on the features extracted from all the maneuvers, resulting in 77.1% test accuracy, 74.1% precision, and 83.3 recall, using SVM. Moreover, the best feature subset, obtained by observing the selection frequency of every single feature during the application of branch and bound, was directly employed on the classification, thus reaching 95.8% accuracy. Although not at the level required by an automatic system, the results show the potential use of pelvic floor pressure distribution profiles data and provide insights into the pelvic floor functioning aspects that contribute to urinary incontinence. PeerJ Inc. 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6907092/ /pubmed/31844587 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8207 Text en ©2019 Carafini et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Bioinformatics
Carafini, Adriano
Sacco, Isabel C.N.
Vieira, Marcus Fraga
Pelvic floor pressure distribution profile in urinary incontinence: a classification study with feature selection
title Pelvic floor pressure distribution profile in urinary incontinence: a classification study with feature selection
title_full Pelvic floor pressure distribution profile in urinary incontinence: a classification study with feature selection
title_fullStr Pelvic floor pressure distribution profile in urinary incontinence: a classification study with feature selection
title_full_unstemmed Pelvic floor pressure distribution profile in urinary incontinence: a classification study with feature selection
title_short Pelvic floor pressure distribution profile in urinary incontinence: a classification study with feature selection
title_sort pelvic floor pressure distribution profile in urinary incontinence: a classification study with feature selection
topic Bioinformatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844587
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8207
work_keys_str_mv AT carafiniadriano pelvicfloorpressuredistributionprofileinurinaryincontinenceaclassificationstudywithfeatureselection
AT saccoisabelcn pelvicfloorpressuredistributionprofileinurinaryincontinenceaclassificationstudywithfeatureselection
AT vieiramarcusfraga pelvicfloorpressuredistributionprofileinurinaryincontinenceaclassificationstudywithfeatureselection