Cargando…
Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review
BACKGROUND: This scoping review aims to identify, review and characterize the published recommendations to conduct and/or to report a systematic review in medical interventions area. METHODS: A search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases, using systematic reviews search f...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0870-1 |
_version_ | 1783478494631559168 |
---|---|
author | Penedones, Ana Alves, Carlos Batel-Marques, Francisco |
author_facet | Penedones, Ana Alves, Carlos Batel-Marques, Francisco |
author_sort | Penedones, Ana |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This scoping review aims to identify, review and characterize the published recommendations to conduct and/or to report a systematic review in medical interventions area. METHODS: A search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases, using systematic reviews search filters. The search comprises all recommendations to conduct and/or report a systematic review. Data on methods were extracted from each recommendation. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-three recommendations were identified. Approximately 60% of retrieved references were published in the last 6 years. Recommendations to both conduct and report a systematic review were issued in 47% studies. The guidance presented in each recommendation to conduct and/ or report a systematic review varied. Almost 96% of the recommendations offer guidance on systematic review methods section. The need and time for updating was only recommended in 29% of recommendations. Forty percent of recommendations endorsed their methods to any subject related to medical interventions. Half of the studies did not specify the design of studies to be included in a systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: Several recommendations to conduct and/or report a systematic review were published and offered different guidance. Further research on the impact of such heterogeneity can improve systematic reviews quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6907169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69071692019-12-20 Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review Penedones, Ana Alves, Carlos Batel-Marques, Francisco BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: This scoping review aims to identify, review and characterize the published recommendations to conduct and/or to report a systematic review in medical interventions area. METHODS: A search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases, using systematic reviews search filters. The search comprises all recommendations to conduct and/or report a systematic review. Data on methods were extracted from each recommendation. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-three recommendations were identified. Approximately 60% of retrieved references were published in the last 6 years. Recommendations to both conduct and report a systematic review were issued in 47% studies. The guidance presented in each recommendation to conduct and/ or report a systematic review varied. Almost 96% of the recommendations offer guidance on systematic review methods section. The need and time for updating was only recommended in 29% of recommendations. Forty percent of recommendations endorsed their methods to any subject related to medical interventions. Half of the studies did not specify the design of studies to be included in a systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: Several recommendations to conduct and/or report a systematic review were published and offered different guidance. Further research on the impact of such heterogeneity can improve systematic reviews quality. BioMed Central 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6907169/ /pubmed/31829132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0870-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Penedones, Ana Alves, Carlos Batel-Marques, Francisco Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review |
title | Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review |
title_full | Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review |
title_short | Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review |
title_sort | recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0870-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT penedonesana recommendationstoconductandreportsystematicreviewsinmedicalliteratureascopingreview AT alvescarlos recommendationstoconductandreportsystematicreviewsinmedicalliteratureascopingreview AT batelmarquesfrancisco recommendationstoconductandreportsystematicreviewsinmedicalliteratureascopingreview |