Cargando…

Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: This scoping review aims to identify, review and characterize the published recommendations to conduct and/or to report a systematic review in medical interventions area. METHODS: A search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases, using systematic reviews search f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penedones, Ana, Alves, Carlos, Batel-Marques, Francisco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0870-1
_version_ 1783478494631559168
author Penedones, Ana
Alves, Carlos
Batel-Marques, Francisco
author_facet Penedones, Ana
Alves, Carlos
Batel-Marques, Francisco
author_sort Penedones, Ana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This scoping review aims to identify, review and characterize the published recommendations to conduct and/or to report a systematic review in medical interventions area. METHODS: A search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases, using systematic reviews search filters. The search comprises all recommendations to conduct and/or report a systematic review. Data on methods were extracted from each recommendation. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-three recommendations were identified. Approximately 60% of retrieved references were published in the last 6 years. Recommendations to both conduct and report a systematic review were issued in 47% studies. The guidance presented in each recommendation to conduct and/ or report a systematic review varied. Almost 96% of the recommendations offer guidance on systematic review methods section. The need and time for updating was only recommended in 29% of recommendations. Forty percent of recommendations endorsed their methods to any subject related to medical interventions. Half of the studies did not specify the design of studies to be included in a systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: Several recommendations to conduct and/or report a systematic review were published and offered different guidance. Further research on the impact of such heterogeneity can improve systematic reviews quality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6907169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69071692019-12-20 Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review Penedones, Ana Alves, Carlos Batel-Marques, Francisco BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: This scoping review aims to identify, review and characterize the published recommendations to conduct and/or to report a systematic review in medical interventions area. METHODS: A search was carried out in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases, using systematic reviews search filters. The search comprises all recommendations to conduct and/or report a systematic review. Data on methods were extracted from each recommendation. A descriptive analysis was performed. RESULTS: Eighty-three recommendations were identified. Approximately 60% of retrieved references were published in the last 6 years. Recommendations to both conduct and report a systematic review were issued in 47% studies. The guidance presented in each recommendation to conduct and/ or report a systematic review varied. Almost 96% of the recommendations offer guidance on systematic review methods section. The need and time for updating was only recommended in 29% of recommendations. Forty percent of recommendations endorsed their methods to any subject related to medical interventions. Half of the studies did not specify the design of studies to be included in a systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: Several recommendations to conduct and/or report a systematic review were published and offered different guidance. Further research on the impact of such heterogeneity can improve systematic reviews quality. BioMed Central 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6907169/ /pubmed/31829132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0870-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Penedones, Ana
Alves, Carlos
Batel-Marques, Francisco
Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review
title Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review
title_full Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review
title_fullStr Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review
title_short Recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review
title_sort recommendations to conduct and report systematic reviews in medical literature: a scoping review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0870-1
work_keys_str_mv AT penedonesana recommendationstoconductandreportsystematicreviewsinmedicalliteratureascopingreview
AT alvescarlos recommendationstoconductandreportsystematicreviewsinmedicalliteratureascopingreview
AT batelmarquesfrancisco recommendationstoconductandreportsystematicreviewsinmedicalliteratureascopingreview