Cargando…

Antibiotic resistance in porcine pathogenic bacteria and relation to antibiotic usage

BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment and prudent use of antimicrobials for pigs is imperative to secure animal health and prevent development of critical resistance. An important step in this one-health context is to monitor resistance patterns of important animal pathogens. The aim of this study was to in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holmer, I., Salomonsen, C. M., Jorsal, S. E., Astrup, L. B., Jensen, V. F., Høg, B. Borck, Pedersen, K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2162-8
_version_ 1783478503334739968
author Holmer, I.
Salomonsen, C. M.
Jorsal, S. E.
Astrup, L. B.
Jensen, V. F.
Høg, B. Borck
Pedersen, K.
author_facet Holmer, I.
Salomonsen, C. M.
Jorsal, S. E.
Astrup, L. B.
Jensen, V. F.
Høg, B. Borck
Pedersen, K.
author_sort Holmer, I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment and prudent use of antimicrobials for pigs is imperative to secure animal health and prevent development of critical resistance. An important step in this one-health context is to monitor resistance patterns of important animal pathogens. The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial resistance patterns of five major pathogens in Danish pigs during a period from 2004 to 2017 and elucidate any developments or associations between resistance and usage of antibiotics. RESULTS: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for Escherichia coli, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Streptococcus suis, Bordetella bronchiseptica, and Staphylococcus hyicus was determined to representatives of antibiotic classes relevant for treatment or surveillance. Escherichia coli isolates were mostly sensitive to fluoroquinolones and colistin, whereas high levels of resistance were observed to ampicillin, spectinomycin, streptomycin, sulfonamides and tetracycline. While resistance levels to most compounds remained relatively stable during the period, resistance to florfenicol increased from 2.1% in 2004 to 18.1% in 2017, likely in response to a concurrent increase in usage. A temporal association between resistance and usage was also observed for neomycin. E. coli serovars O138 and O149 were generally more resistant than O139. For A. pleuropneumoniae, the resistance pattern was homogenous and predictable throughout the study period, displaying high MIC values only to erythromycin whereas almost all isolates were susceptible to all other compounds. Most S. suis isolates were sensitive to penicillin whereas high resistance levels to erythromycin and tetracycline were recorded, and resistance to erythromycin and trimethoprim increasing over time. For S. hyicus, sensitivity to the majority of the antimicrobials tested was observed. However, penicillin resistance was recorded in 69.4–88.9% of the isolates. All B. bronchiseptica isolates were resistant to ampicillin, whereas all but two isolates were sensitive to florfenicol. The data obtained have served as background for a recent formulation of evidence-based treatment guidelines for pigs. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic resistance varied for some pathogens over time and in response to usage. Resistance to critically important compounds was low. The results emphasize the need for continuous surveillance of resistance patterns also in pig pathogenic bacteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6907208
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69072082019-12-20 Antibiotic resistance in porcine pathogenic bacteria and relation to antibiotic usage Holmer, I. Salomonsen, C. M. Jorsal, S. E. Astrup, L. B. Jensen, V. F. Høg, B. Borck Pedersen, K. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Optimal treatment and prudent use of antimicrobials for pigs is imperative to secure animal health and prevent development of critical resistance. An important step in this one-health context is to monitor resistance patterns of important animal pathogens. The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial resistance patterns of five major pathogens in Danish pigs during a period from 2004 to 2017 and elucidate any developments or associations between resistance and usage of antibiotics. RESULTS: The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for Escherichia coli, Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Streptococcus suis, Bordetella bronchiseptica, and Staphylococcus hyicus was determined to representatives of antibiotic classes relevant for treatment or surveillance. Escherichia coli isolates were mostly sensitive to fluoroquinolones and colistin, whereas high levels of resistance were observed to ampicillin, spectinomycin, streptomycin, sulfonamides and tetracycline. While resistance levels to most compounds remained relatively stable during the period, resistance to florfenicol increased from 2.1% in 2004 to 18.1% in 2017, likely in response to a concurrent increase in usage. A temporal association between resistance and usage was also observed for neomycin. E. coli serovars O138 and O149 were generally more resistant than O139. For A. pleuropneumoniae, the resistance pattern was homogenous and predictable throughout the study period, displaying high MIC values only to erythromycin whereas almost all isolates were susceptible to all other compounds. Most S. suis isolates were sensitive to penicillin whereas high resistance levels to erythromycin and tetracycline were recorded, and resistance to erythromycin and trimethoprim increasing over time. For S. hyicus, sensitivity to the majority of the antimicrobials tested was observed. However, penicillin resistance was recorded in 69.4–88.9% of the isolates. All B. bronchiseptica isolates were resistant to ampicillin, whereas all but two isolates were sensitive to florfenicol. The data obtained have served as background for a recent formulation of evidence-based treatment guidelines for pigs. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic resistance varied for some pathogens over time and in response to usage. Resistance to critically important compounds was low. The results emphasize the need for continuous surveillance of resistance patterns also in pig pathogenic bacteria. BioMed Central 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6907208/ /pubmed/31829171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2162-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Holmer, I.
Salomonsen, C. M.
Jorsal, S. E.
Astrup, L. B.
Jensen, V. F.
Høg, B. Borck
Pedersen, K.
Antibiotic resistance in porcine pathogenic bacteria and relation to antibiotic usage
title Antibiotic resistance in porcine pathogenic bacteria and relation to antibiotic usage
title_full Antibiotic resistance in porcine pathogenic bacteria and relation to antibiotic usage
title_fullStr Antibiotic resistance in porcine pathogenic bacteria and relation to antibiotic usage
title_full_unstemmed Antibiotic resistance in porcine pathogenic bacteria and relation to antibiotic usage
title_short Antibiotic resistance in porcine pathogenic bacteria and relation to antibiotic usage
title_sort antibiotic resistance in porcine pathogenic bacteria and relation to antibiotic usage
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907208/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-019-2162-8
work_keys_str_mv AT holmeri antibioticresistanceinporcinepathogenicbacteriaandrelationtoantibioticusage
AT salomonsencm antibioticresistanceinporcinepathogenicbacteriaandrelationtoantibioticusage
AT jorsalse antibioticresistanceinporcinepathogenicbacteriaandrelationtoantibioticusage
AT astruplb antibioticresistanceinporcinepathogenicbacteriaandrelationtoantibioticusage
AT jensenvf antibioticresistanceinporcinepathogenicbacteriaandrelationtoantibioticusage
AT høgbborck antibioticresistanceinporcinepathogenicbacteriaandrelationtoantibioticusage
AT pedersenk antibioticresistanceinporcinepathogenicbacteriaandrelationtoantibioticusage