Cargando…

Budgeting of non-commercial clinical trials: development of a budget tool by a public funding agency

BACKGROUND: Investigator-led multicentre randomised trials are essential to generate evidence on the optimal use of medical interventions. These non-commercial trials are often hampered by underfunding, which may lead to difficulties in gathering a team with the necessary expertise, a delayed trial...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nevens, Hilde, Harrison, Jillian, Vrijens, France, Verleye, Leen, Stocquart, Nelle, Marynen, Elisabeth, Hulstaert, Frank
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3900-8
_version_ 1783478505937305600
author Nevens, Hilde
Harrison, Jillian
Vrijens, France
Verleye, Leen
Stocquart, Nelle
Marynen, Elisabeth
Hulstaert, Frank
author_facet Nevens, Hilde
Harrison, Jillian
Vrijens, France
Verleye, Leen
Stocquart, Nelle
Marynen, Elisabeth
Hulstaert, Frank
author_sort Nevens, Hilde
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Investigator-led multicentre randomised trials are essential to generate evidence on the optimal use of medical interventions. These non-commercial trials are often hampered by underfunding, which may lead to difficulties in gathering a team with the necessary expertise, a delayed trial start, slow recruitment and even early trial discontinuation. As a new public funder of pragmatic clinical trials, the KCE Trials programme was committed to correctly pay all trial activities in order to assure timely delivery of high-quality trial results. As no appropriate trial budget tool was readily publicly available that took into account the costs for the sponsor as well as the costs for participating sites, we developed a tool to make the budgeting of a clinical trial efficient, transparent and fair across applicants. METHODS: All trial-related activities of the sponsor and sites were categorised, and cost drivers were identified. All elements were included in a spreadsheet tool allowing the sponsor team to calculate in detail the various activities of a clinical trial and to appreciate the budget impact of specific cost drivers, e.g. a delay in recruitment. Hourly fees by role were adapted from published data. Fixed amounts per activity were developed when appropriate. RESULTS: This publicly available tool has already been used for 17 trials funded since the start of the KCE Trials programme in 2016, and it continues to be used and improved. This budget tool is used together with additional risk-reducing measures such as a multistep selection process with advance payments, a recruitment feasibility check by sponsor and funder, a close monitoring of study progress and a milestone-based payment schedule with the last payment made when the manuscript is submitted. CONCLUSIONS: The budget tool helps the KCE Trials programme to answer relevant research questions in a timely way, within budget and with high quality, a necessary condition to achieve impact of this programme for patients, clinical practice and healthcare payers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6907219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69072192019-12-20 Budgeting of non-commercial clinical trials: development of a budget tool by a public funding agency Nevens, Hilde Harrison, Jillian Vrijens, France Verleye, Leen Stocquart, Nelle Marynen, Elisabeth Hulstaert, Frank Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: Investigator-led multicentre randomised trials are essential to generate evidence on the optimal use of medical interventions. These non-commercial trials are often hampered by underfunding, which may lead to difficulties in gathering a team with the necessary expertise, a delayed trial start, slow recruitment and even early trial discontinuation. As a new public funder of pragmatic clinical trials, the KCE Trials programme was committed to correctly pay all trial activities in order to assure timely delivery of high-quality trial results. As no appropriate trial budget tool was readily publicly available that took into account the costs for the sponsor as well as the costs for participating sites, we developed a tool to make the budgeting of a clinical trial efficient, transparent and fair across applicants. METHODS: All trial-related activities of the sponsor and sites were categorised, and cost drivers were identified. All elements were included in a spreadsheet tool allowing the sponsor team to calculate in detail the various activities of a clinical trial and to appreciate the budget impact of specific cost drivers, e.g. a delay in recruitment. Hourly fees by role were adapted from published data. Fixed amounts per activity were developed when appropriate. RESULTS: This publicly available tool has already been used for 17 trials funded since the start of the KCE Trials programme in 2016, and it continues to be used and improved. This budget tool is used together with additional risk-reducing measures such as a multistep selection process with advance payments, a recruitment feasibility check by sponsor and funder, a close monitoring of study progress and a milestone-based payment schedule with the last payment made when the manuscript is submitted. CONCLUSIONS: The budget tool helps the KCE Trials programme to answer relevant research questions in a timely way, within budget and with high quality, a necessary condition to achieve impact of this programme for patients, clinical practice and healthcare payers. BioMed Central 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6907219/ /pubmed/31829233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3900-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Nevens, Hilde
Harrison, Jillian
Vrijens, France
Verleye, Leen
Stocquart, Nelle
Marynen, Elisabeth
Hulstaert, Frank
Budgeting of non-commercial clinical trials: development of a budget tool by a public funding agency
title Budgeting of non-commercial clinical trials: development of a budget tool by a public funding agency
title_full Budgeting of non-commercial clinical trials: development of a budget tool by a public funding agency
title_fullStr Budgeting of non-commercial clinical trials: development of a budget tool by a public funding agency
title_full_unstemmed Budgeting of non-commercial clinical trials: development of a budget tool by a public funding agency
title_short Budgeting of non-commercial clinical trials: development of a budget tool by a public funding agency
title_sort budgeting of non-commercial clinical trials: development of a budget tool by a public funding agency
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829233
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3900-8
work_keys_str_mv AT nevenshilde budgetingofnoncommercialclinicaltrialsdevelopmentofabudgettoolbyapublicfundingagency
AT harrisonjillian budgetingofnoncommercialclinicaltrialsdevelopmentofabudgettoolbyapublicfundingagency
AT vrijensfrance budgetingofnoncommercialclinicaltrialsdevelopmentofabudgettoolbyapublicfundingagency
AT verleyeleen budgetingofnoncommercialclinicaltrialsdevelopmentofabudgettoolbyapublicfundingagency
AT stocquartnelle budgetingofnoncommercialclinicaltrialsdevelopmentofabudgettoolbyapublicfundingagency
AT marynenelisabeth budgetingofnoncommercialclinicaltrialsdevelopmentofabudgettoolbyapublicfundingagency
AT hulstaertfrank budgetingofnoncommercialclinicaltrialsdevelopmentofabudgettoolbyapublicfundingagency