Cargando…

The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding

BACKGROUND: Controlled mating procedures are widely accepted as a key aspect of successful breeding in almost all animal species. In honeybees, however, controlled mating is hard to achieve. Therefore, there have been several attempts to breed honeybees using free-mated queens. In such breeding sche...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Plate, Manuel, Bernstein, Richard, Hoppe, Andreas, Bienefeld, Kaspar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0518-y
_version_ 1783478524881928192
author Plate, Manuel
Bernstein, Richard
Hoppe, Andreas
Bienefeld, Kaspar
author_facet Plate, Manuel
Bernstein, Richard
Hoppe, Andreas
Bienefeld, Kaspar
author_sort Plate, Manuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Controlled mating procedures are widely accepted as a key aspect of successful breeding in almost all animal species. In honeybees, however, controlled mating is hard to achieve. Therefore, there have been several attempts to breed honeybees using free-mated queens. In such breeding schemes, selection occurs only on the maternal path since the drone sires are random samples of the population. The success rates of breeding approaches without controlled mating have so far not been investigated on a theoretical or simulation-based level. METHODS: Stochastic simulation studies were carried out to examine the chances of success in honeybee breeding with and without controlled mating. We investigated the influence of different sizes of breeding populations (500, 1000, 2000 colonies per year) and unselected passive populations (0, 500, 1000, 2000, infinitely many colonies per year) on selection for a maternally (queen) and directly (worker group) influenced trait with moderate ([Formula: see text] ) or strong ([Formula: see text] ) negative correlation between the two effects. The simulations described 20 years of selection. RESULTS: Our simulations showed a reduction of breeding success between 47 and 99% if mating was not controlled. In the most drastic cases, practically no genetic gain could be generated without controlled mating. We observed that in the trade-off between selection for direct or maternal effects, the absence of mating control leads to a shift in favor of maternal effects. Moreover, we describe the implications of different breeding strategies on the unselected passive population that benefits only indirectly via the transfer of queens or drones from the breeding population. We show that genetic gain in the passive population develops parallel to that of the breeding population. However, we found a genetic lag that became significantly smaller as more breeding queens served as dams of queens in the passive population. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that even when unwanted admixture of subspecies can be excluded in natural matings, controlled mating is imperative for successful breeding efforts. This is especially highlighted by the strong positive impact that controlled mating in the breeding population has on the unselected passive population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6907340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69073402019-12-19 The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding Plate, Manuel Bernstein, Richard Hoppe, Andreas Bienefeld, Kaspar Genet Sel Evol Research Article BACKGROUND: Controlled mating procedures are widely accepted as a key aspect of successful breeding in almost all animal species. In honeybees, however, controlled mating is hard to achieve. Therefore, there have been several attempts to breed honeybees using free-mated queens. In such breeding schemes, selection occurs only on the maternal path since the drone sires are random samples of the population. The success rates of breeding approaches without controlled mating have so far not been investigated on a theoretical or simulation-based level. METHODS: Stochastic simulation studies were carried out to examine the chances of success in honeybee breeding with and without controlled mating. We investigated the influence of different sizes of breeding populations (500, 1000, 2000 colonies per year) and unselected passive populations (0, 500, 1000, 2000, infinitely many colonies per year) on selection for a maternally (queen) and directly (worker group) influenced trait with moderate ([Formula: see text] ) or strong ([Formula: see text] ) negative correlation between the two effects. The simulations described 20 years of selection. RESULTS: Our simulations showed a reduction of breeding success between 47 and 99% if mating was not controlled. In the most drastic cases, practically no genetic gain could be generated without controlled mating. We observed that in the trade-off between selection for direct or maternal effects, the absence of mating control leads to a shift in favor of maternal effects. Moreover, we describe the implications of different breeding strategies on the unselected passive population that benefits only indirectly via the transfer of queens or drones from the breeding population. We show that genetic gain in the passive population develops parallel to that of the breeding population. However, we found a genetic lag that became significantly smaller as more breeding queens served as dams of queens in the passive population. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that even when unwanted admixture of subspecies can be excluded in natural matings, controlled mating is imperative for successful breeding efforts. This is especially highlighted by the strong positive impact that controlled mating in the breeding population has on the unselected passive population. BioMed Central 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6907340/ /pubmed/31830903 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0518-y Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Plate, Manuel
Bernstein, Richard
Hoppe, Andreas
Bienefeld, Kaspar
The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding
title The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding
title_full The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding
title_fullStr The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding
title_full_unstemmed The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding
title_short The importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding
title_sort importance of controlled mating in honeybee breeding
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830903
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12711-019-0518-y
work_keys_str_mv AT platemanuel theimportanceofcontrolledmatinginhoneybeebreeding
AT bernsteinrichard theimportanceofcontrolledmatinginhoneybeebreeding
AT hoppeandreas theimportanceofcontrolledmatinginhoneybeebreeding
AT bienefeldkaspar theimportanceofcontrolledmatinginhoneybeebreeding
AT platemanuel importanceofcontrolledmatinginhoneybeebreeding
AT bernsteinrichard importanceofcontrolledmatinginhoneybeebreeding
AT hoppeandreas importanceofcontrolledmatinginhoneybeebreeding
AT bienefeldkaspar importanceofcontrolledmatinginhoneybeebreeding