Cargando…
Utilising a multi‐item questionnaire to assess household food security in Australia
ISSUE ADDRESSED: Currently, two food sufficiency questions are utilised as a proxy measure of national food security status in Australia. These questions do not capture all dimensions of food security and have been attributed to underreporting of the problem. The purpose of this study was to investi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29543402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hpja.61 |
_version_ | 1783478532185260032 |
---|---|
author | Butcher, Lucy M. O'Sullivan, Therese A. Ryan, Maria M. Lo, Johnny Devine, Amanda |
author_facet | Butcher, Lucy M. O'Sullivan, Therese A. Ryan, Maria M. Lo, Johnny Devine, Amanda |
author_sort | Butcher, Lucy M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ISSUE ADDRESSED: Currently, two food sufficiency questions are utilised as a proxy measure of national food security status in Australia. These questions do not capture all dimensions of food security and have been attributed to underreporting of the problem. The purpose of this study was to investigate food security using the short form of the US Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) within an Australian context; and explore the relationship between food security status and multiple socio‐demographic variables. METHODS: Two online surveys were completed by 2334 Australian participants from November 2014 to February 2015. Surveys contained the short form of the HFSSM and twelve socio‐demographic questions. Cross‐tabulations chi‐square tests and a multinomial logistic regression model were employed to analyse the survey data. RESULTS: Food security status of the respondents was classified accordingly: High or Marginal (64%, n = 1495), Low (20%, n = 460) or Very Low (16%, n = 379). Significant independent predictors of food security were age (P < 0.001), marital status (P = 0.005), household income (P < 0.001) and education (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest food insecurity is an important issue across Australia and that certain groups, regardless of income, are particularly vulnerable. SO WHAT? Government policy and health promotion interventions that specifically target “at risk” groups may assist to more effectively address the problem. Additionally, the use of a multi‐item measure is worth considering as a national indicator of food security in Australia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6907406 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69074062019-12-23 Utilising a multi‐item questionnaire to assess household food security in Australia Butcher, Lucy M. O'Sullivan, Therese A. Ryan, Maria M. Lo, Johnny Devine, Amanda Health Promot J Austr Articles ISSUE ADDRESSED: Currently, two food sufficiency questions are utilised as a proxy measure of national food security status in Australia. These questions do not capture all dimensions of food security and have been attributed to underreporting of the problem. The purpose of this study was to investigate food security using the short form of the US Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) within an Australian context; and explore the relationship between food security status and multiple socio‐demographic variables. METHODS: Two online surveys were completed by 2334 Australian participants from November 2014 to February 2015. Surveys contained the short form of the HFSSM and twelve socio‐demographic questions. Cross‐tabulations chi‐square tests and a multinomial logistic regression model were employed to analyse the survey data. RESULTS: Food security status of the respondents was classified accordingly: High or Marginal (64%, n = 1495), Low (20%, n = 460) or Very Low (16%, n = 379). Significant independent predictors of food security were age (P < 0.001), marital status (P = 0.005), household income (P < 0.001) and education (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Findings suggest food insecurity is an important issue across Australia and that certain groups, regardless of income, are particularly vulnerable. SO WHAT? Government policy and health promotion interventions that specifically target “at risk” groups may assist to more effectively address the problem. Additionally, the use of a multi‐item measure is worth considering as a national indicator of food security in Australia. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-04-11 2019-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6907406/ /pubmed/29543402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hpja.61 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Health Promotion Journal of Australia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Australian Health Promotion Association This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Articles Butcher, Lucy M. O'Sullivan, Therese A. Ryan, Maria M. Lo, Johnny Devine, Amanda Utilising a multi‐item questionnaire to assess household food security in Australia |
title | Utilising a multi‐item questionnaire to assess household food security in Australia |
title_full | Utilising a multi‐item questionnaire to assess household food security in Australia |
title_fullStr | Utilising a multi‐item questionnaire to assess household food security in Australia |
title_full_unstemmed | Utilising a multi‐item questionnaire to assess household food security in Australia |
title_short | Utilising a multi‐item questionnaire to assess household food security in Australia |
title_sort | utilising a multi‐item questionnaire to assess household food security in australia |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907406/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29543402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hpja.61 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT butcherlucym utilisingamultiitemquestionnairetoassesshouseholdfoodsecurityinaustralia AT osullivantheresea utilisingamultiitemquestionnairetoassesshouseholdfoodsecurityinaustralia AT ryanmariam utilisingamultiitemquestionnairetoassesshouseholdfoodsecurityinaustralia AT lojohnny utilisingamultiitemquestionnairetoassesshouseholdfoodsecurityinaustralia AT devineamanda utilisingamultiitemquestionnairetoassesshouseholdfoodsecurityinaustralia |