Cargando…

Interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: Are we using the right measure?

Understanding how ecological networks are assembled is important because network structure reflects ecosystem functioning and stability. Quantitative network analysis incorporates measures of interaction strength as an estimate of the magnitude of the effect of interaction partners on one another. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Novella-Fernandez, Roberto, Rodrigo, Anselm, Arnan, Xavier, Bosch, Jordi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225930
_version_ 1783478589075750912
author Novella-Fernandez, Roberto
Rodrigo, Anselm
Arnan, Xavier
Bosch, Jordi
author_facet Novella-Fernandez, Roberto
Rodrigo, Anselm
Arnan, Xavier
Bosch, Jordi
author_sort Novella-Fernandez, Roberto
collection PubMed
description Understanding how ecological networks are assembled is important because network structure reflects ecosystem functioning and stability. Quantitative network analysis incorporates measures of interaction strength as an estimate of the magnitude of the effect of interaction partners on one another. Most plant-pollinator network studies use frequency of interaction between individual pollinators and individual plants (encounter) as a surrogate of interaction strength. However, the number of flowers visited per encounter may strongly vary among pollinator and plant species, and therefore not all encounters are quantitatively equivalent. We sampled plant-pollinator interactions in a Mediterranean scrubland and tested whether using a measure of interaction strength based on the number of flowers visited resulted in changes in species (species strength, interaction species asymmetry, specialization) and network descriptors (nestedness, H2’, interaction evenness, plant generality, pollinator generality) compared to the encounter-based measure. Several species (including some of the most abundant ones) showed important changes in species descriptors, notably in specialization. These changes were especially important in plant species with large floral displays, which became less specialized with the visit-based measure of interaction strength. At the network level we found significant changes in all properties analysed. With the encounter-based approach plant generality was much higher than pollinator generality (high specialization asymmetry between trophic levels). However, with the visit-based approach plant generality was greatly reduced so that plants and pollinators had similar levels of generalization. Interaction evenness also decreased strongly with the visit-based approach. We conclude that accounting for the number of flowers visited per encounter provides a more ecologically relevant measure of interaction strength. Our results have important implications for the stability of pollination networks and the evolution of plant-pollinator interactions. The use of a visit-based approach is especially important in studies relating interaction network structure and ecosystem function (pollination and/or exploitation of floral resources).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6907754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69077542019-12-27 Interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: Are we using the right measure? Novella-Fernandez, Roberto Rodrigo, Anselm Arnan, Xavier Bosch, Jordi PLoS One Research Article Understanding how ecological networks are assembled is important because network structure reflects ecosystem functioning and stability. Quantitative network analysis incorporates measures of interaction strength as an estimate of the magnitude of the effect of interaction partners on one another. Most plant-pollinator network studies use frequency of interaction between individual pollinators and individual plants (encounter) as a surrogate of interaction strength. However, the number of flowers visited per encounter may strongly vary among pollinator and plant species, and therefore not all encounters are quantitatively equivalent. We sampled plant-pollinator interactions in a Mediterranean scrubland and tested whether using a measure of interaction strength based on the number of flowers visited resulted in changes in species (species strength, interaction species asymmetry, specialization) and network descriptors (nestedness, H2’, interaction evenness, plant generality, pollinator generality) compared to the encounter-based measure. Several species (including some of the most abundant ones) showed important changes in species descriptors, notably in specialization. These changes were especially important in plant species with large floral displays, which became less specialized with the visit-based measure of interaction strength. At the network level we found significant changes in all properties analysed. With the encounter-based approach plant generality was much higher than pollinator generality (high specialization asymmetry between trophic levels). However, with the visit-based approach plant generality was greatly reduced so that plants and pollinators had similar levels of generalization. Interaction evenness also decreased strongly with the visit-based approach. We conclude that accounting for the number of flowers visited per encounter provides a more ecologically relevant measure of interaction strength. Our results have important implications for the stability of pollination networks and the evolution of plant-pollinator interactions. The use of a visit-based approach is especially important in studies relating interaction network structure and ecosystem function (pollination and/or exploitation of floral resources). Public Library of Science 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6907754/ /pubmed/31830077 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225930 Text en © 2019 Novella-Fernandez et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Novella-Fernandez, Roberto
Rodrigo, Anselm
Arnan, Xavier
Bosch, Jordi
Interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: Are we using the right measure?
title Interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: Are we using the right measure?
title_full Interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: Are we using the right measure?
title_fullStr Interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: Are we using the right measure?
title_full_unstemmed Interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: Are we using the right measure?
title_short Interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: Are we using the right measure?
title_sort interaction strength in plant-pollinator networks: are we using the right measure?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830077
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225930
work_keys_str_mv AT novellafernandezroberto interactionstrengthinplantpollinatornetworksareweusingtherightmeasure
AT rodrigoanselm interactionstrengthinplantpollinatornetworksareweusingtherightmeasure
AT arnanxavier interactionstrengthinplantpollinatornetworksareweusingtherightmeasure
AT boschjordi interactionstrengthinplantpollinatornetworksareweusingtherightmeasure