Cargando…

Economic evaluation of HPV DNA test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: A health policy discussion in Greece

BACKGROUND: HPV test appears to be more effective in cervical cancer (CC) screening. However, the decision of its adoption as a primary screening method by substituting the established cytology lies in the evaluation of multiple criteria. Aim of this study is to evaluate the economic and clinical im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Skroumpelos, Anastasios, Agorastos, Theodoros, Constantinidis, Theodoros, Chatzistamatiou, Kimon, Kyriopoulos, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226335
_version_ 1783478605830946816
author Skroumpelos, Anastasios
Agorastos, Theodoros
Constantinidis, Theodoros
Chatzistamatiou, Kimon
Kyriopoulos, John
author_facet Skroumpelos, Anastasios
Agorastos, Theodoros
Constantinidis, Theodoros
Chatzistamatiou, Kimon
Kyriopoulos, John
author_sort Skroumpelos, Anastasios
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: HPV test appears to be more effective in cervical cancer (CC) screening. However, the decision of its adoption as a primary screening method by substituting the established cytology lies in the evaluation of multiple criteria. Aim of this study is to evaluate the economic and clinical impact of HPV test as primary screening method for CC. METHODS: A decision tree and a Markov model were developed to simulate the screening algorithm and the natural history of CC. Fourteen different screening strategies were evaluated, for women 25–65 years old. Clinical inputs were drawn from the HERMES study and cost inputs from the official price lists. In the absence of CC treatment cost data, the respective Spanish costs were used after being converted to 2017 Greek values. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: All screening strategies, that offer as primary screening method triennial HPV genotyping (simultaneous or reflex) alone or as co-testing with cytology appear to be more effective than all other strategies, with regards to both annual CC mortality, due to missed disease (-10.1), and CC incidence(-7.5) versus annual cytology (current practice). Of those, the strategy with HPV test with simultaneous 16/18 genotyping is the strategy that provides savings of 1.050 million euros annually. However, when the above strategy is offered quinquennially despite the fact that outcomes are decreased it remains more effective than current practice (-7.7 deaths and -1.3 incidence) and more savings per death averted (1.323 million) or incidence reduced (7.837 million) are realized. CONCLUSIONS: HPV 16/18 genotyping as a primary screening method for CC appears to be one of the most effective strategies and dominates current practice in respect to both cost and outcomes. Even when compared with all other strategies, the outcomes that it generates justify the cost that it requires, representing a good value for money alternative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6907825
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69078252019-12-27 Economic evaluation of HPV DNA test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: A health policy discussion in Greece Skroumpelos, Anastasios Agorastos, Theodoros Constantinidis, Theodoros Chatzistamatiou, Kimon Kyriopoulos, John PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: HPV test appears to be more effective in cervical cancer (CC) screening. However, the decision of its adoption as a primary screening method by substituting the established cytology lies in the evaluation of multiple criteria. Aim of this study is to evaluate the economic and clinical impact of HPV test as primary screening method for CC. METHODS: A decision tree and a Markov model were developed to simulate the screening algorithm and the natural history of CC. Fourteen different screening strategies were evaluated, for women 25–65 years old. Clinical inputs were drawn from the HERMES study and cost inputs from the official price lists. In the absence of CC treatment cost data, the respective Spanish costs were used after being converted to 2017 Greek values. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. RESULTS: All screening strategies, that offer as primary screening method triennial HPV genotyping (simultaneous or reflex) alone or as co-testing with cytology appear to be more effective than all other strategies, with regards to both annual CC mortality, due to missed disease (-10.1), and CC incidence(-7.5) versus annual cytology (current practice). Of those, the strategy with HPV test with simultaneous 16/18 genotyping is the strategy that provides savings of 1.050 million euros annually. However, when the above strategy is offered quinquennially despite the fact that outcomes are decreased it remains more effective than current practice (-7.7 deaths and -1.3 incidence) and more savings per death averted (1.323 million) or incidence reduced (7.837 million) are realized. CONCLUSIONS: HPV 16/18 genotyping as a primary screening method for CC appears to be one of the most effective strategies and dominates current practice in respect to both cost and outcomes. Even when compared with all other strategies, the outcomes that it generates justify the cost that it requires, representing a good value for money alternative. Public Library of Science 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6907825/ /pubmed/31830114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226335 Text en © 2019 Skroumpelos et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Skroumpelos, Anastasios
Agorastos, Theodoros
Constantinidis, Theodoros
Chatzistamatiou, Kimon
Kyriopoulos, John
Economic evaluation of HPV DNA test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: A health policy discussion in Greece
title Economic evaluation of HPV DNA test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: A health policy discussion in Greece
title_full Economic evaluation of HPV DNA test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: A health policy discussion in Greece
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of HPV DNA test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: A health policy discussion in Greece
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of HPV DNA test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: A health policy discussion in Greece
title_short Economic evaluation of HPV DNA test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: A health policy discussion in Greece
title_sort economic evaluation of hpv dna test as primary screening method for cervical cancer: a health policy discussion in greece
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907825/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226335
work_keys_str_mv AT skroumpelosanastasios economicevaluationofhpvdnatestasprimaryscreeningmethodforcervicalcancerahealthpolicydiscussioningreece
AT agorastostheodoros economicevaluationofhpvdnatestasprimaryscreeningmethodforcervicalcancerahealthpolicydiscussioningreece
AT constantinidistheodoros economicevaluationofhpvdnatestasprimaryscreeningmethodforcervicalcancerahealthpolicydiscussioningreece
AT chatzistamatioukimon economicevaluationofhpvdnatestasprimaryscreeningmethodforcervicalcancerahealthpolicydiscussioningreece
AT kyriopoulosjohn economicevaluationofhpvdnatestasprimaryscreeningmethodforcervicalcancerahealthpolicydiscussioningreece