Cargando…
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
BACKGROUND: A systematic review of core outcome sets (COS) for research is updated annually to populate an online database. It is a resource intensive review to do annually but automation techniques have potential to aid the process. The production of guidance and standards in COS development means...
Autores principales: | Gargon, Elizabeth, Gorst, Sarah L., Williamson, Paula R. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907830/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830081 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225980 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 6(th) annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
por: Gargon, Elizabeth, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and user survey
por: Gorst, Sarah L, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps
por: Gorst, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
por: Gorst, Sarah L., et al.
Publicado: (2016)