Cargando…

Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening

OBJECTIVE: Given rising incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis (GC/CT), development of efficacious screening strategies is critical to interruption of the infection cycle. However, a small proportion of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) results are inconclusive—resultin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blair, Cheríe S., Garner, Omai B., Pedone, Bettina, Elias, Sam, Comulada, W. Scott, Landovitz, Raphael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226413
_version_ 1783478608402055168
author Blair, Cheríe S.
Garner, Omai B.
Pedone, Bettina
Elias, Sam
Comulada, W. Scott
Landovitz, Raphael J.
author_facet Blair, Cheríe S.
Garner, Omai B.
Pedone, Bettina
Elias, Sam
Comulada, W. Scott
Landovitz, Raphael J.
author_sort Blair, Cheríe S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Given rising incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis (GC/CT), development of efficacious screening strategies is critical to interruption of the infection cycle. However, a small proportion of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) results are inconclusive—resulting in delays in diagnosis and treatment. As such, this study seeks to evaluate factors associated with inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of individuals who received an inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT result at a single institution from 3/2016-6/2018. Inconclusive GC/CT NAAT was defined as presence of PCR amplification inhibitors using Roche Cobas v2.0 CT/NG assay. Clinical charts were abstracted for age, gender, HIV status, GC/CT (urogenital, rectal, pharyngeal) and syphilis screening results during the study period, clinic type (HIV clinic, university student health center, other), and whether repeat testing occurred within 6 months following an inconclusive result. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios of factors associated with receipt of repeat testing following an inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT result. RESULTS: During the study period, 6.1% (852/14,015) of rectal GC/CT NAAT were inconclusive for one or both of GC and CT. Among the 413 patients whose inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT results that were included in our analysis, 66.6% (275/413) received repeat testing within 6 months, of which 8.7% (24/275) were positive (compared to 5.4% positivity rate of all rectal samples). In multivariable analysis, individuals living with HIV had lower odds of receiving repeat testing following inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT compared to HIV uninfected individuals (adj OR 0.25; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being disproportionately affected by the STI epidemic, individuals living with HIV had 75% lower odds of receiving repeat testing following inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT compared to HIV-uninfected individuals, representing potentially missed opportunities for treatment and prevention of ongoing STI transmission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6907836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69078362019-12-27 Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening Blair, Cheríe S. Garner, Omai B. Pedone, Bettina Elias, Sam Comulada, W. Scott Landovitz, Raphael J. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Given rising incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis (GC/CT), development of efficacious screening strategies is critical to interruption of the infection cycle. However, a small proportion of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) results are inconclusive—resulting in delays in diagnosis and treatment. As such, this study seeks to evaluate factors associated with inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of individuals who received an inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT result at a single institution from 3/2016-6/2018. Inconclusive GC/CT NAAT was defined as presence of PCR amplification inhibitors using Roche Cobas v2.0 CT/NG assay. Clinical charts were abstracted for age, gender, HIV status, GC/CT (urogenital, rectal, pharyngeal) and syphilis screening results during the study period, clinic type (HIV clinic, university student health center, other), and whether repeat testing occurred within 6 months following an inconclusive result. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios of factors associated with receipt of repeat testing following an inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT result. RESULTS: During the study period, 6.1% (852/14,015) of rectal GC/CT NAAT were inconclusive for one or both of GC and CT. Among the 413 patients whose inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT results that were included in our analysis, 66.6% (275/413) received repeat testing within 6 months, of which 8.7% (24/275) were positive (compared to 5.4% positivity rate of all rectal samples). In multivariable analysis, individuals living with HIV had lower odds of receiving repeat testing following inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT compared to HIV uninfected individuals (adj OR 0.25; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being disproportionately affected by the STI epidemic, individuals living with HIV had 75% lower odds of receiving repeat testing following inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT compared to HIV-uninfected individuals, representing potentially missed opportunities for treatment and prevention of ongoing STI transmission. Public Library of Science 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6907836/ /pubmed/31830129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226413 Text en © 2019 Blair et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Blair, Cheríe S.
Garner, Omai B.
Pedone, Bettina
Elias, Sam
Comulada, W. Scott
Landovitz, Raphael J.
Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening
title Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening
title_full Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening
title_fullStr Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening
title_full_unstemmed Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening
title_short Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening
title_sort factors associated with repeat rectal neisseria gonorrhoeae and chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: a potential missed opportunity for screening
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226413
work_keys_str_mv AT blaircheries factorsassociatedwithrepeatrectalneisseriagonorrhoeaeandchlamydiatrachomatisscreeningfollowinginconclusivenucleicacidamplificationtestingapotentialmissedopportunityforscreening
AT garneromaib factorsassociatedwithrepeatrectalneisseriagonorrhoeaeandchlamydiatrachomatisscreeningfollowinginconclusivenucleicacidamplificationtestingapotentialmissedopportunityforscreening
AT pedonebettina factorsassociatedwithrepeatrectalneisseriagonorrhoeaeandchlamydiatrachomatisscreeningfollowinginconclusivenucleicacidamplificationtestingapotentialmissedopportunityforscreening
AT eliassam factorsassociatedwithrepeatrectalneisseriagonorrhoeaeandchlamydiatrachomatisscreeningfollowinginconclusivenucleicacidamplificationtestingapotentialmissedopportunityforscreening
AT comuladawscott factorsassociatedwithrepeatrectalneisseriagonorrhoeaeandchlamydiatrachomatisscreeningfollowinginconclusivenucleicacidamplificationtestingapotentialmissedopportunityforscreening
AT landovitzraphaelj factorsassociatedwithrepeatrectalneisseriagonorrhoeaeandchlamydiatrachomatisscreeningfollowinginconclusivenucleicacidamplificationtestingapotentialmissedopportunityforscreening