Cargando…
Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening
OBJECTIVE: Given rising incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis (GC/CT), development of efficacious screening strategies is critical to interruption of the infection cycle. However, a small proportion of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) results are inconclusive—resultin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226413 |
_version_ | 1783478608402055168 |
---|---|
author | Blair, Cheríe S. Garner, Omai B. Pedone, Bettina Elias, Sam Comulada, W. Scott Landovitz, Raphael J. |
author_facet | Blair, Cheríe S. Garner, Omai B. Pedone, Bettina Elias, Sam Comulada, W. Scott Landovitz, Raphael J. |
author_sort | Blair, Cheríe S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Given rising incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis (GC/CT), development of efficacious screening strategies is critical to interruption of the infection cycle. However, a small proportion of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) results are inconclusive—resulting in delays in diagnosis and treatment. As such, this study seeks to evaluate factors associated with inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of individuals who received an inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT result at a single institution from 3/2016-6/2018. Inconclusive GC/CT NAAT was defined as presence of PCR amplification inhibitors using Roche Cobas v2.0 CT/NG assay. Clinical charts were abstracted for age, gender, HIV status, GC/CT (urogenital, rectal, pharyngeal) and syphilis screening results during the study period, clinic type (HIV clinic, university student health center, other), and whether repeat testing occurred within 6 months following an inconclusive result. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios of factors associated with receipt of repeat testing following an inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT result. RESULTS: During the study period, 6.1% (852/14,015) of rectal GC/CT NAAT were inconclusive for one or both of GC and CT. Among the 413 patients whose inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT results that were included in our analysis, 66.6% (275/413) received repeat testing within 6 months, of which 8.7% (24/275) were positive (compared to 5.4% positivity rate of all rectal samples). In multivariable analysis, individuals living with HIV had lower odds of receiving repeat testing following inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT compared to HIV uninfected individuals (adj OR 0.25; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being disproportionately affected by the STI epidemic, individuals living with HIV had 75% lower odds of receiving repeat testing following inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT compared to HIV-uninfected individuals, representing potentially missed opportunities for treatment and prevention of ongoing STI transmission. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6907836 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69078362019-12-27 Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening Blair, Cheríe S. Garner, Omai B. Pedone, Bettina Elias, Sam Comulada, W. Scott Landovitz, Raphael J. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Given rising incidence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis (GC/CT), development of efficacious screening strategies is critical to interruption of the infection cycle. However, a small proportion of nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) results are inconclusive—resulting in delays in diagnosis and treatment. As such, this study seeks to evaluate factors associated with inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT. METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review of individuals who received an inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT result at a single institution from 3/2016-6/2018. Inconclusive GC/CT NAAT was defined as presence of PCR amplification inhibitors using Roche Cobas v2.0 CT/NG assay. Clinical charts were abstracted for age, gender, HIV status, GC/CT (urogenital, rectal, pharyngeal) and syphilis screening results during the study period, clinic type (HIV clinic, university student health center, other), and whether repeat testing occurred within 6 months following an inconclusive result. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios of factors associated with receipt of repeat testing following an inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT result. RESULTS: During the study period, 6.1% (852/14,015) of rectal GC/CT NAAT were inconclusive for one or both of GC and CT. Among the 413 patients whose inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT results that were included in our analysis, 66.6% (275/413) received repeat testing within 6 months, of which 8.7% (24/275) were positive (compared to 5.4% positivity rate of all rectal samples). In multivariable analysis, individuals living with HIV had lower odds of receiving repeat testing following inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT compared to HIV uninfected individuals (adj OR 0.25; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite being disproportionately affected by the STI epidemic, individuals living with HIV had 75% lower odds of receiving repeat testing following inconclusive rectal GC/CT NAAT compared to HIV-uninfected individuals, representing potentially missed opportunities for treatment and prevention of ongoing STI transmission. Public Library of Science 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6907836/ /pubmed/31830129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226413 Text en © 2019 Blair et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Blair, Cheríe S. Garner, Omai B. Pedone, Bettina Elias, Sam Comulada, W. Scott Landovitz, Raphael J. Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening |
title | Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening |
title_full | Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening |
title_fullStr | Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening |
title_short | Factors associated with repeat rectal Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: A potential missed opportunity for screening |
title_sort | factors associated with repeat rectal neisseria gonorrhoeae and chlamydia trachomatis screening following inconclusive nucleic acid amplification testing: a potential missed opportunity for screening |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6907836/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226413 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blaircheries factorsassociatedwithrepeatrectalneisseriagonorrhoeaeandchlamydiatrachomatisscreeningfollowinginconclusivenucleicacidamplificationtestingapotentialmissedopportunityforscreening AT garneromaib factorsassociatedwithrepeatrectalneisseriagonorrhoeaeandchlamydiatrachomatisscreeningfollowinginconclusivenucleicacidamplificationtestingapotentialmissedopportunityforscreening AT pedonebettina factorsassociatedwithrepeatrectalneisseriagonorrhoeaeandchlamydiatrachomatisscreeningfollowinginconclusivenucleicacidamplificationtestingapotentialmissedopportunityforscreening AT eliassam factorsassociatedwithrepeatrectalneisseriagonorrhoeaeandchlamydiatrachomatisscreeningfollowinginconclusivenucleicacidamplificationtestingapotentialmissedopportunityforscreening AT comuladawscott factorsassociatedwithrepeatrectalneisseriagonorrhoeaeandchlamydiatrachomatisscreeningfollowinginconclusivenucleicacidamplificationtestingapotentialmissedopportunityforscreening AT landovitzraphaelj factorsassociatedwithrepeatrectalneisseriagonorrhoeaeandchlamydiatrachomatisscreeningfollowinginconclusivenucleicacidamplificationtestingapotentialmissedopportunityforscreening |