Cargando…

Simulation in Cleft Surgery

A number of digital and haptic simulators have been developed to address challenges facing cleft surgery education. However, to date, a comprehensive review of available simulators has yet to be performed. Our goal is to appraise cleft surgery simulators that have been described to date, their role...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kantar, Rami S., Alfonso, Allyson R., Ramly, Elie P., Diaz-Siso, J. Rodrigo, Breugem, Corstiaan C., Flores, Roberto L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31942398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002438
_version_ 1783478712807718912
author Kantar, Rami S.
Alfonso, Allyson R.
Ramly, Elie P.
Diaz-Siso, J. Rodrigo
Breugem, Corstiaan C.
Flores, Roberto L.
author_facet Kantar, Rami S.
Alfonso, Allyson R.
Ramly, Elie P.
Diaz-Siso, J. Rodrigo
Breugem, Corstiaan C.
Flores, Roberto L.
author_sort Kantar, Rami S.
collection PubMed
description A number of digital and haptic simulators have been developed to address challenges facing cleft surgery education. However, to date, a comprehensive review of available simulators has yet to be performed. Our goal is to appraise cleft surgery simulators that have been described to date, their role within a simulation-based educational strategy, the costs associated with their use, and data supporting or refuting their utility. METHODS: The following PubMed literature search strategies were used: “Cleft AND Simulation,” “Cleft Surgery AND Simulation,” “Cleft Lip AND Simulation,” “Cleft Palate AND Simulation.” Only English language articles up to May 1, 2019, were included. Simulation phases of learning were classified based on our previously proposed model for simulation training. RESULTS: A total of 22 articles were included in this study. Within identified articles, 11 (50%) were strictly descriptive of simulator features, whereas the remaining 11 (50%) evaluated specific outcomes pertinent to the use of cleft surgery simulators. The 22 included articles described 16 cleft surgery simulators. Out of these 16 cleft surgery simulators, 7 (43.8%) were high fidelity haptic simulators, 5 (31.2%) were low fidelity haptic simulators, and 4 (25.0%) were digital simulators. The cost to simulator user ranged from freely available up to $300. CONCLUSIONS: Cleft surgery simulators vary considerably in their features, purpose, cost, availability, and scientific evidence in support of their use. Future multi-institutional collaborative initiatives should focus on demonstrating the efficacy of current cleft simulators and developing standardized assessment scales.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6908384
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69083842020-01-15 Simulation in Cleft Surgery Kantar, Rami S. Alfonso, Allyson R. Ramly, Elie P. Diaz-Siso, J. Rodrigo Breugem, Corstiaan C. Flores, Roberto L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article A number of digital and haptic simulators have been developed to address challenges facing cleft surgery education. However, to date, a comprehensive review of available simulators has yet to be performed. Our goal is to appraise cleft surgery simulators that have been described to date, their role within a simulation-based educational strategy, the costs associated with their use, and data supporting or refuting their utility. METHODS: The following PubMed literature search strategies were used: “Cleft AND Simulation,” “Cleft Surgery AND Simulation,” “Cleft Lip AND Simulation,” “Cleft Palate AND Simulation.” Only English language articles up to May 1, 2019, were included. Simulation phases of learning were classified based on our previously proposed model for simulation training. RESULTS: A total of 22 articles were included in this study. Within identified articles, 11 (50%) were strictly descriptive of simulator features, whereas the remaining 11 (50%) evaluated specific outcomes pertinent to the use of cleft surgery simulators. The 22 included articles described 16 cleft surgery simulators. Out of these 16 cleft surgery simulators, 7 (43.8%) were high fidelity haptic simulators, 5 (31.2%) were low fidelity haptic simulators, and 4 (25.0%) were digital simulators. The cost to simulator user ranged from freely available up to $300. CONCLUSIONS: Cleft surgery simulators vary considerably in their features, purpose, cost, availability, and scientific evidence in support of their use. Future multi-institutional collaborative initiatives should focus on demonstrating the efficacy of current cleft simulators and developing standardized assessment scales. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6908384/ /pubmed/31942398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002438 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kantar, Rami S.
Alfonso, Allyson R.
Ramly, Elie P.
Diaz-Siso, J. Rodrigo
Breugem, Corstiaan C.
Flores, Roberto L.
Simulation in Cleft Surgery
title Simulation in Cleft Surgery
title_full Simulation in Cleft Surgery
title_fullStr Simulation in Cleft Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Simulation in Cleft Surgery
title_short Simulation in Cleft Surgery
title_sort simulation in cleft surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908384/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31942398
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002438
work_keys_str_mv AT kantarramis simulationincleftsurgery
AT alfonsoallysonr simulationincleftsurgery
AT ramlyeliep simulationincleftsurgery
AT diazsisojrodrigo simulationincleftsurgery
AT breugemcorstiaanc simulationincleftsurgery
AT floresrobertol simulationincleftsurgery