Cargando…
Simulation in Cleft Surgery
A number of digital and haptic simulators have been developed to address challenges facing cleft surgery education. However, to date, a comprehensive review of available simulators has yet to be performed. Our goal is to appraise cleft surgery simulators that have been described to date, their role...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31942398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002438 |
_version_ | 1783478712807718912 |
---|---|
author | Kantar, Rami S. Alfonso, Allyson R. Ramly, Elie P. Diaz-Siso, J. Rodrigo Breugem, Corstiaan C. Flores, Roberto L. |
author_facet | Kantar, Rami S. Alfonso, Allyson R. Ramly, Elie P. Diaz-Siso, J. Rodrigo Breugem, Corstiaan C. Flores, Roberto L. |
author_sort | Kantar, Rami S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A number of digital and haptic simulators have been developed to address challenges facing cleft surgery education. However, to date, a comprehensive review of available simulators has yet to be performed. Our goal is to appraise cleft surgery simulators that have been described to date, their role within a simulation-based educational strategy, the costs associated with their use, and data supporting or refuting their utility. METHODS: The following PubMed literature search strategies were used: “Cleft AND Simulation,” “Cleft Surgery AND Simulation,” “Cleft Lip AND Simulation,” “Cleft Palate AND Simulation.” Only English language articles up to May 1, 2019, were included. Simulation phases of learning were classified based on our previously proposed model for simulation training. RESULTS: A total of 22 articles were included in this study. Within identified articles, 11 (50%) were strictly descriptive of simulator features, whereas the remaining 11 (50%) evaluated specific outcomes pertinent to the use of cleft surgery simulators. The 22 included articles described 16 cleft surgery simulators. Out of these 16 cleft surgery simulators, 7 (43.8%) were high fidelity haptic simulators, 5 (31.2%) were low fidelity haptic simulators, and 4 (25.0%) were digital simulators. The cost to simulator user ranged from freely available up to $300. CONCLUSIONS: Cleft surgery simulators vary considerably in their features, purpose, cost, availability, and scientific evidence in support of their use. Future multi-institutional collaborative initiatives should focus on demonstrating the efficacy of current cleft simulators and developing standardized assessment scales. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6908384 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69083842020-01-15 Simulation in Cleft Surgery Kantar, Rami S. Alfonso, Allyson R. Ramly, Elie P. Diaz-Siso, J. Rodrigo Breugem, Corstiaan C. Flores, Roberto L. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article A number of digital and haptic simulators have been developed to address challenges facing cleft surgery education. However, to date, a comprehensive review of available simulators has yet to be performed. Our goal is to appraise cleft surgery simulators that have been described to date, their role within a simulation-based educational strategy, the costs associated with their use, and data supporting or refuting their utility. METHODS: The following PubMed literature search strategies were used: “Cleft AND Simulation,” “Cleft Surgery AND Simulation,” “Cleft Lip AND Simulation,” “Cleft Palate AND Simulation.” Only English language articles up to May 1, 2019, were included. Simulation phases of learning were classified based on our previously proposed model for simulation training. RESULTS: A total of 22 articles were included in this study. Within identified articles, 11 (50%) were strictly descriptive of simulator features, whereas the remaining 11 (50%) evaluated specific outcomes pertinent to the use of cleft surgery simulators. The 22 included articles described 16 cleft surgery simulators. Out of these 16 cleft surgery simulators, 7 (43.8%) were high fidelity haptic simulators, 5 (31.2%) were low fidelity haptic simulators, and 4 (25.0%) were digital simulators. The cost to simulator user ranged from freely available up to $300. CONCLUSIONS: Cleft surgery simulators vary considerably in their features, purpose, cost, availability, and scientific evidence in support of their use. Future multi-institutional collaborative initiatives should focus on demonstrating the efficacy of current cleft simulators and developing standardized assessment scales. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6908384/ /pubmed/31942398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002438 Text en Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kantar, Rami S. Alfonso, Allyson R. Ramly, Elie P. Diaz-Siso, J. Rodrigo Breugem, Corstiaan C. Flores, Roberto L. Simulation in Cleft Surgery |
title | Simulation in Cleft Surgery |
title_full | Simulation in Cleft Surgery |
title_fullStr | Simulation in Cleft Surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Simulation in Cleft Surgery |
title_short | Simulation in Cleft Surgery |
title_sort | simulation in cleft surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908384/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31942398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002438 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kantarramis simulationincleftsurgery AT alfonsoallysonr simulationincleftsurgery AT ramlyeliep simulationincleftsurgery AT diazsisojrodrigo simulationincleftsurgery AT breugemcorstiaanc simulationincleftsurgery AT floresrobertol simulationincleftsurgery |