Cargando…
Evaluating learning and change in orthopaedics: What is the evidence-base?
Learning and change are key elements of clinical governance and are responsible for the progression of our specialty. Although orthopaedics has been slow to embrace quality improvement, recent years have seen global developments in surgical education, quality improvement, and patient outcome researc...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31840018 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v10.i11.378 |
_version_ | 1783478724540235776 |
---|---|
author | Valsamis, Epaminondas Markos Sukeik, Mohamed |
author_facet | Valsamis, Epaminondas Markos Sukeik, Mohamed |
author_sort | Valsamis, Epaminondas Markos |
collection | PubMed |
description | Learning and change are key elements of clinical governance and are responsible for the progression of our specialty. Although orthopaedics has been slow to embrace quality improvement, recent years have seen global developments in surgical education, quality improvement, and patient outcome research. This review covers recent advances in the evaluation of learning and change and identifies the most important research questions that remain unanswered. Research into proxies of learning is improving but more work is required to identify the best proxy for a given procedure. Learning curves are becoming commonplace but are poorly integrated into postgraduate training curricula and there is little agreement over the most appropriate method to analyse learning curve data. With various organisations promoting centralisation of care, learning curve analysis is more important than ever before. The use of simulation in orthopaedics is developing but is yet to be formally mapped to resident training worldwide. Patient outcome research is rapidly changing, with an increased focus on quality of life measures. These are key to patients and their care. Cost-utility analysis is increasingly seen in orthopaedic manuscripts and this needs to continue to improve evidence-based care. Large-scale international, multi-centre randomised trials are gaining popularity and updated guidance on sample size estimation needs to become widespread. A global lack of surgeon equipoise will need to be addressed. Quality improvement projects frequently employ interrupted time-series analysis to evaluate change. This technique’s limitations must be acknowledged, and more work is required to improve the evaluation of change in a dynamic healthcare environment where multiple interventions frequently occur. Advances in the evaluation of learning and change are needed to drive improved international surgical education and increase the reliability, validity, and importance of the conclusions drawn from orthopaedic research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6908444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69084442019-12-13 Evaluating learning and change in orthopaedics: What is the evidence-base? Valsamis, Epaminondas Markos Sukeik, Mohamed World J Orthop Minireviews Learning and change are key elements of clinical governance and are responsible for the progression of our specialty. Although orthopaedics has been slow to embrace quality improvement, recent years have seen global developments in surgical education, quality improvement, and patient outcome research. This review covers recent advances in the evaluation of learning and change and identifies the most important research questions that remain unanswered. Research into proxies of learning is improving but more work is required to identify the best proxy for a given procedure. Learning curves are becoming commonplace but are poorly integrated into postgraduate training curricula and there is little agreement over the most appropriate method to analyse learning curve data. With various organisations promoting centralisation of care, learning curve analysis is more important than ever before. The use of simulation in orthopaedics is developing but is yet to be formally mapped to resident training worldwide. Patient outcome research is rapidly changing, with an increased focus on quality of life measures. These are key to patients and their care. Cost-utility analysis is increasingly seen in orthopaedic manuscripts and this needs to continue to improve evidence-based care. Large-scale international, multi-centre randomised trials are gaining popularity and updated guidance on sample size estimation needs to become widespread. A global lack of surgeon equipoise will need to be addressed. Quality improvement projects frequently employ interrupted time-series analysis to evaluate change. This technique’s limitations must be acknowledged, and more work is required to improve the evaluation of change in a dynamic healthcare environment where multiple interventions frequently occur. Advances in the evaluation of learning and change are needed to drive improved international surgical education and increase the reliability, validity, and importance of the conclusions drawn from orthopaedic research. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6908444/ /pubmed/31840018 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v10.i11.378 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Minireviews Valsamis, Epaminondas Markos Sukeik, Mohamed Evaluating learning and change in orthopaedics: What is the evidence-base? |
title | Evaluating learning and change in orthopaedics: What is the evidence-base? |
title_full | Evaluating learning and change in orthopaedics: What is the evidence-base? |
title_fullStr | Evaluating learning and change in orthopaedics: What is the evidence-base? |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating learning and change in orthopaedics: What is the evidence-base? |
title_short | Evaluating learning and change in orthopaedics: What is the evidence-base? |
title_sort | evaluating learning and change in orthopaedics: what is the evidence-base? |
topic | Minireviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31840018 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v10.i11.378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT valsamisepaminondasmarkos evaluatinglearningandchangeinorthopaedicswhatistheevidencebase AT sukeikmohamed evaluatinglearningandchangeinorthopaedicswhatistheevidencebase |