Cargando…

Magnetically controlled growing instrumentation for early onset scoliosis: Caution needed when interpreting the literature

BACKGROUND: Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) are a novel treatment option for early onset scoliosis (EOS). Although the complication profile with MCGR use has been reviewed, these reviews do not take into account important implants modifications, termed iterations, that were made due to e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shaw, Kenneth Aaron, Hire, Justin M, Kim, Scott, Devito, Dennis P, Schmitz, Michael L, Murphy, Joshua S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31840020
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v10.i11.394
_version_ 1783478724775116800
author Shaw, Kenneth Aaron
Hire, Justin M
Kim, Scott
Devito, Dennis P
Schmitz, Michael L
Murphy, Joshua S
author_facet Shaw, Kenneth Aaron
Hire, Justin M
Kim, Scott
Devito, Dennis P
Schmitz, Michael L
Murphy, Joshua S
author_sort Shaw, Kenneth Aaron
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) are a novel treatment option for early onset scoliosis (EOS). Although the complication profile with MCGR use has been reviewed, these reviews do not take into account important implants modifications, termed iterations, that were made due to early on postoperative complications is not well reported or understood. AIM: To assess the effect of MCGR implant iterations on post-operative complications in EOS. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify studies investigating MCGR specifically for the treatment of EOS, refined to those reporting the implant iteration, specifically the incorporation of the keeper plate to the implant design. Articles with mixed implant iteration usage were excluded. Complications following surgery were recorded as well as potential risk factors and compared between implant cohorts. RESULTS: Although 20 articles were identified for inclusion, 5 included mixed implant iteration leaving a total of 271 patients identified through 15 clinical studies that met inclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 25.4-mo. Pre-keeper plate implants were utilized in 3 studies with a total of 49 patients. Overall, 115 (42.4%) post-operative complications were identified, with 87% defined as major. The addition of the keeper plate significantly decreased the rate of post-operative complications per study (35.7% vs 80.6%, P = 0.036), and the rate of distraction failure (8.1% vs 40.8%, P = 0.02). Unplanned reoperation occurred in 69 (26.7%) patients but was not different between implant iteration cohorts (25.5% without keeper plate vs 27.1% with keeper plate, P = 0.92). CONCLUSION: MCGR for EOS has a cumulative complication rate of 42.4% but this is significantly reduced to 35.7% when reviewing only keeper-plate enabled implants. However, 25% of published articles included mixed implant iterations. Future studies should discern between implants iterations when reporting on the usage of MCGR for EOS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6908445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69084452019-12-13 Magnetically controlled growing instrumentation for early onset scoliosis: Caution needed when interpreting the literature Shaw, Kenneth Aaron Hire, Justin M Kim, Scott Devito, Dennis P Schmitz, Michael L Murphy, Joshua S World J Orthop Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) are a novel treatment option for early onset scoliosis (EOS). Although the complication profile with MCGR use has been reviewed, these reviews do not take into account important implants modifications, termed iterations, that were made due to early on postoperative complications is not well reported or understood. AIM: To assess the effect of MCGR implant iterations on post-operative complications in EOS. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify studies investigating MCGR specifically for the treatment of EOS, refined to those reporting the implant iteration, specifically the incorporation of the keeper plate to the implant design. Articles with mixed implant iteration usage were excluded. Complications following surgery were recorded as well as potential risk factors and compared between implant cohorts. RESULTS: Although 20 articles were identified for inclusion, 5 included mixed implant iteration leaving a total of 271 patients identified through 15 clinical studies that met inclusion criteria. The average follow-up was 25.4-mo. Pre-keeper plate implants were utilized in 3 studies with a total of 49 patients. Overall, 115 (42.4%) post-operative complications were identified, with 87% defined as major. The addition of the keeper plate significantly decreased the rate of post-operative complications per study (35.7% vs 80.6%, P = 0.036), and the rate of distraction failure (8.1% vs 40.8%, P = 0.02). Unplanned reoperation occurred in 69 (26.7%) patients but was not different between implant iteration cohorts (25.5% without keeper plate vs 27.1% with keeper plate, P = 0.92). CONCLUSION: MCGR for EOS has a cumulative complication rate of 42.4% but this is significantly reduced to 35.7% when reviewing only keeper-plate enabled implants. However, 25% of published articles included mixed implant iterations. Future studies should discern between implants iterations when reporting on the usage of MCGR for EOS. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6908445/ /pubmed/31840020 http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v10.i11.394 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews
Shaw, Kenneth Aaron
Hire, Justin M
Kim, Scott
Devito, Dennis P
Schmitz, Michael L
Murphy, Joshua S
Magnetically controlled growing instrumentation for early onset scoliosis: Caution needed when interpreting the literature
title Magnetically controlled growing instrumentation for early onset scoliosis: Caution needed when interpreting the literature
title_full Magnetically controlled growing instrumentation for early onset scoliosis: Caution needed when interpreting the literature
title_fullStr Magnetically controlled growing instrumentation for early onset scoliosis: Caution needed when interpreting the literature
title_full_unstemmed Magnetically controlled growing instrumentation for early onset scoliosis: Caution needed when interpreting the literature
title_short Magnetically controlled growing instrumentation for early onset scoliosis: Caution needed when interpreting the literature
title_sort magnetically controlled growing instrumentation for early onset scoliosis: caution needed when interpreting the literature
topic Systematic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31840020
http://dx.doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v10.i11.394
work_keys_str_mv AT shawkennethaaron magneticallycontrolledgrowinginstrumentationforearlyonsetscoliosiscautionneededwheninterpretingtheliterature
AT hirejustinm magneticallycontrolledgrowinginstrumentationforearlyonsetscoliosiscautionneededwheninterpretingtheliterature
AT kimscott magneticallycontrolledgrowinginstrumentationforearlyonsetscoliosiscautionneededwheninterpretingtheliterature
AT devitodennisp magneticallycontrolledgrowinginstrumentationforearlyonsetscoliosiscautionneededwheninterpretingtheliterature
AT schmitzmichaell magneticallycontrolledgrowinginstrumentationforearlyonsetscoliosiscautionneededwheninterpretingtheliterature
AT murphyjoshuas magneticallycontrolledgrowinginstrumentationforearlyonsetscoliosiscautionneededwheninterpretingtheliterature