Cargando…
Bionic reconstruction: Restoration of extremity function with osseointegrated and mind-controlled prostheses
BACKGROUND: Loss of an extremity at any level has a major impact on a patient’s life. Using bionic reconstruction, extremity function can be restored and the patient reintegrated into daily life. Surgical procedures including selective nerve transfer and anchoring of prostheses into bone are combine...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31201567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-019-1518-1 |
_version_ | 1783478751595593728 |
---|---|
author | Aman, Martin Festin, Christopher Sporer, Matthias E. Gstoettner, Clemens Prahm, Cosima Bergmeister, Konstantin D. Aszmann, Oskar C. |
author_facet | Aman, Martin Festin, Christopher Sporer, Matthias E. Gstoettner, Clemens Prahm, Cosima Bergmeister, Konstantin D. Aszmann, Oskar C. |
author_sort | Aman, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Loss of an extremity at any level has a major impact on a patient’s life. Using bionic reconstruction, extremity function can be restored and the patient reintegrated into daily life. Surgical procedures including selective nerve transfer and anchoring of prostheses into bone are combined with structured rehabilitation and modern prosthetic fitting. The patient is thereby able to use the prostheses intuitively and with multiple degrees of freedom. METHODS: This article presents the concept and approach for modern bionic reconstruction in detail and the relevant literature. The nerve transfer matrices for targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and the concept of osseointegration to optimally fit a patient with a modern prosthesis are described in detail. As a clinical example, the case of a patient who suffered from traumatic amputation and subsequently received TMR in combination with an osseointegrated implant and structured rehabilitation is presented. RESULTS: Using bionic reconstruction, basic hand functions can be restored and bimanual dexterity can expand the range of daily activities. Besides this approach to bionic reconstruction, its advantages and disadvantages are compared to hand transplantation. The limitations and perspectives of modern bionic reconstruction are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Bionic reconstruction is a sophisticated method for restoring extremity function and nowadays can be considered a standard of care for all levels of upper extremity amputations. An interdisciplinary approach and structured rehabilitation are necessary to master prosthetic function to ultimately reintegrate patients into daily life. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6908564 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69085642019-12-26 Bionic reconstruction: Restoration of extremity function with osseointegrated and mind-controlled prostheses Aman, Martin Festin, Christopher Sporer, Matthias E. Gstoettner, Clemens Prahm, Cosima Bergmeister, Konstantin D. Aszmann, Oskar C. Wien Klin Wochenschr Main Topic BACKGROUND: Loss of an extremity at any level has a major impact on a patient’s life. Using bionic reconstruction, extremity function can be restored and the patient reintegrated into daily life. Surgical procedures including selective nerve transfer and anchoring of prostheses into bone are combined with structured rehabilitation and modern prosthetic fitting. The patient is thereby able to use the prostheses intuitively and with multiple degrees of freedom. METHODS: This article presents the concept and approach for modern bionic reconstruction in detail and the relevant literature. The nerve transfer matrices for targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and the concept of osseointegration to optimally fit a patient with a modern prosthesis are described in detail. As a clinical example, the case of a patient who suffered from traumatic amputation and subsequently received TMR in combination with an osseointegrated implant and structured rehabilitation is presented. RESULTS: Using bionic reconstruction, basic hand functions can be restored and bimanual dexterity can expand the range of daily activities. Besides this approach to bionic reconstruction, its advantages and disadvantages are compared to hand transplantation. The limitations and perspectives of modern bionic reconstruction are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: Bionic reconstruction is a sophisticated method for restoring extremity function and nowadays can be considered a standard of care for all levels of upper extremity amputations. An interdisciplinary approach and structured rehabilitation are necessary to master prosthetic function to ultimately reintegrate patients into daily life. Springer Vienna 2019-06-14 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6908564/ /pubmed/31201567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-019-1518-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Main Topic Aman, Martin Festin, Christopher Sporer, Matthias E. Gstoettner, Clemens Prahm, Cosima Bergmeister, Konstantin D. Aszmann, Oskar C. Bionic reconstruction: Restoration of extremity function with osseointegrated and mind-controlled prostheses |
title | Bionic reconstruction: Restoration of extremity function with osseointegrated and mind-controlled prostheses |
title_full | Bionic reconstruction: Restoration of extremity function with osseointegrated and mind-controlled prostheses |
title_fullStr | Bionic reconstruction: Restoration of extremity function with osseointegrated and mind-controlled prostheses |
title_full_unstemmed | Bionic reconstruction: Restoration of extremity function with osseointegrated and mind-controlled prostheses |
title_short | Bionic reconstruction: Restoration of extremity function with osseointegrated and mind-controlled prostheses |
title_sort | bionic reconstruction: restoration of extremity function with osseointegrated and mind-controlled prostheses |
topic | Main Topic |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908564/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31201567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00508-019-1518-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amanmartin bionicreconstructionrestorationofextremityfunctionwithosseointegratedandmindcontrolledprostheses AT festinchristopher bionicreconstructionrestorationofextremityfunctionwithosseointegratedandmindcontrolledprostheses AT sporermatthiase bionicreconstructionrestorationofextremityfunctionwithosseointegratedandmindcontrolledprostheses AT gstoettnerclemens bionicreconstructionrestorationofextremityfunctionwithosseointegratedandmindcontrolledprostheses AT prahmcosima bionicreconstructionrestorationofextremityfunctionwithosseointegratedandmindcontrolledprostheses AT bergmeisterkonstantind bionicreconstructionrestorationofextremityfunctionwithosseointegratedandmindcontrolledprostheses AT aszmannoskarc bionicreconstructionrestorationofextremityfunctionwithosseointegratedandmindcontrolledprostheses |