Cargando…

Manipulating the perception of time affects voluntary breath‐holding duration

In this study, we examined how time perception, a psychological factor, impacts the physiological response to prolonged, voluntary breath holding. Participants (n = 26) held their breath while watching a distorted timer that made it appear as though time was moving up to 40% faster or slower than re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vigran, Hannah J., Kapral, Anna G., Tytell, Eric D., Kao, Mimi H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31833235
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14309
_version_ 1783478807214161920
author Vigran, Hannah J.
Kapral, Anna G.
Tytell, Eric D.
Kao, Mimi H.
author_facet Vigran, Hannah J.
Kapral, Anna G.
Tytell, Eric D.
Kao, Mimi H.
author_sort Vigran, Hannah J.
collection PubMed
description In this study, we examined how time perception, a psychological factor, impacts the physiological response to prolonged, voluntary breath holding. Participants (n = 26) held their breath while watching a distorted timer that made it appear as though time was moving up to 40% faster or slower than real time. We monitored total breath‐holding duration under different time manipulation conditions as well as the onset of involuntary breathing movements. This physiological breaking point marks the end of the “easy‐going” phase of apnea and the start of the “struggle” phase. Based on prior work showing that psychological factors, such as attention and motivation, can influence the length of the struggle phase, we hypothesized that manipulating the perception of time would affect overall breath‐holding duration by changing the duration of the struggle phase, but not the easy‐going phase. We found that time perception can be successfully manipulated using a distorted timekeeper, and total breath‐holding duration correlated with perceived time, not actual time. Contrary to our hypothesis, this effect was attributable to changes in the onset of the physiological breaking point, not changes in the length of the struggle phase. These results demonstrate that unconscious psychological factors and cognitive processes can significantly influence fundamental physiological processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6908740
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69087402019-12-20 Manipulating the perception of time affects voluntary breath‐holding duration Vigran, Hannah J. Kapral, Anna G. Tytell, Eric D. Kao, Mimi H. Physiol Rep Original Research In this study, we examined how time perception, a psychological factor, impacts the physiological response to prolonged, voluntary breath holding. Participants (n = 26) held their breath while watching a distorted timer that made it appear as though time was moving up to 40% faster or slower than real time. We monitored total breath‐holding duration under different time manipulation conditions as well as the onset of involuntary breathing movements. This physiological breaking point marks the end of the “easy‐going” phase of apnea and the start of the “struggle” phase. Based on prior work showing that psychological factors, such as attention and motivation, can influence the length of the struggle phase, we hypothesized that manipulating the perception of time would affect overall breath‐holding duration by changing the duration of the struggle phase, but not the easy‐going phase. We found that time perception can be successfully manipulated using a distorted timekeeper, and total breath‐holding duration correlated with perceived time, not actual time. Contrary to our hypothesis, this effect was attributable to changes in the onset of the physiological breaking point, not changes in the length of the struggle phase. These results demonstrate that unconscious psychological factors and cognitive processes can significantly influence fundamental physiological processes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6908740/ /pubmed/31833235 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14309 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Vigran, Hannah J.
Kapral, Anna G.
Tytell, Eric D.
Kao, Mimi H.
Manipulating the perception of time affects voluntary breath‐holding duration
title Manipulating the perception of time affects voluntary breath‐holding duration
title_full Manipulating the perception of time affects voluntary breath‐holding duration
title_fullStr Manipulating the perception of time affects voluntary breath‐holding duration
title_full_unstemmed Manipulating the perception of time affects voluntary breath‐holding duration
title_short Manipulating the perception of time affects voluntary breath‐holding duration
title_sort manipulating the perception of time affects voluntary breath‐holding duration
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908740/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31833235
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.14309
work_keys_str_mv AT vigranhannahj manipulatingtheperceptionoftimeaffectsvoluntarybreathholdingduration
AT kapralannag manipulatingtheperceptionoftimeaffectsvoluntarybreathholdingduration
AT tytellericd manipulatingtheperceptionoftimeaffectsvoluntarybreathholdingduration
AT kaomimih manipulatingtheperceptionoftimeaffectsvoluntarybreathholdingduration