Cargando…
Investigation of apomorphine during sleep in Parkinson’s: Improvement in UPDRS Scores
Sleep is responsible for several functions required for homeostasis. REM sleep could be a rearrangement period where limits of certain functions can be moved to a new state of balance. This study proposes that dopaminergic deficit may be responsible for the circadian dysregulation that occur with ne...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31871600 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ni.2019.8207 |
_version_ | 1783478850196340736 |
---|---|
author | Pieroni, Miguel A. |
author_facet | Pieroni, Miguel A. |
author_sort | Pieroni, Miguel A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sleep is responsible for several functions required for homeostasis. REM sleep could be a rearrangement period where limits of certain functions can be moved to a new state of balance. This study proposes that dopaminergic deficit may be responsible for the circadian dysregulation that occur with neurodegeneration and therefore a restitution of REM sleep and an improvement in Parkinson disease’s symptoms can be achieved with the controlled use of dopamine agonists during the night. Twenty parkinsonian patients underwent to a onemonth study of subcutaneous nocturnal apomorphine treatment at the beginning of each REM stage. This therapeutic approach led to a significant benefit for patients in all of the 3 UPDRS scores. The mean change from baseline in the MDS-UPDRS Part I, II and III was significantly greater in the apomorphine vs. placebo group. In the UPDRS Part I total score was 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.612, -0.012) and 3.3 (95% CI: 4.732, 1.867) for the placebo and apomorphine groups, respectively (difference between groups: 2.5, 95% CI: 3.454, 1.545; P = 0.002). For UPDRS Part II total score, the mean change was 1.3 (95% CI: 2.692, - 0.09) and 4.6 (6.916, 2.28). Difference between groups: 3.3, 95% CI: 4.752, 1.847; P = 0.013. In UPDRS Part III was 1.1 (95% CI: 2.425, -0.225) and 5.5 (95% CI: 8.808, 2.191). Difference between groups: 4.4, (95% CI: 6.321, 2.478; P = 0.012). We can conclude that sleep alteration in PD can be improved by stimulation of D2 receptors. The symptomatic benefits obtained due to restoration of REM functions were significant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6908956 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69089562019-12-23 Investigation of apomorphine during sleep in Parkinson’s: Improvement in UPDRS Scores Pieroni, Miguel A. Neurol Int Article Sleep is responsible for several functions required for homeostasis. REM sleep could be a rearrangement period where limits of certain functions can be moved to a new state of balance. This study proposes that dopaminergic deficit may be responsible for the circadian dysregulation that occur with neurodegeneration and therefore a restitution of REM sleep and an improvement in Parkinson disease’s symptoms can be achieved with the controlled use of dopamine agonists during the night. Twenty parkinsonian patients underwent to a onemonth study of subcutaneous nocturnal apomorphine treatment at the beginning of each REM stage. This therapeutic approach led to a significant benefit for patients in all of the 3 UPDRS scores. The mean change from baseline in the MDS-UPDRS Part I, II and III was significantly greater in the apomorphine vs. placebo group. In the UPDRS Part I total score was 0.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.612, -0.012) and 3.3 (95% CI: 4.732, 1.867) for the placebo and apomorphine groups, respectively (difference between groups: 2.5, 95% CI: 3.454, 1.545; P = 0.002). For UPDRS Part II total score, the mean change was 1.3 (95% CI: 2.692, - 0.09) and 4.6 (6.916, 2.28). Difference between groups: 3.3, 95% CI: 4.752, 1.847; P = 0.013. In UPDRS Part III was 1.1 (95% CI: 2.425, -0.225) and 5.5 (95% CI: 8.808, 2.191). Difference between groups: 4.4, (95% CI: 6.321, 2.478; P = 0.012). We can conclude that sleep alteration in PD can be improved by stimulation of D2 receptors. The symptomatic benefits obtained due to restoration of REM functions were significant. PAGEPress Publications, Pavia, Italy 2019-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6908956/ /pubmed/31871600 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ni.2019.8207 Text en ©Copyright: the Author(s), 2019 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Article Pieroni, Miguel A. Investigation of apomorphine during sleep in Parkinson’s: Improvement in UPDRS Scores |
title | Investigation of apomorphine during sleep in Parkinson’s: Improvement in UPDRS Scores |
title_full | Investigation of apomorphine during sleep in Parkinson’s: Improvement in UPDRS Scores |
title_fullStr | Investigation of apomorphine during sleep in Parkinson’s: Improvement in UPDRS Scores |
title_full_unstemmed | Investigation of apomorphine during sleep in Parkinson’s: Improvement in UPDRS Scores |
title_short | Investigation of apomorphine during sleep in Parkinson’s: Improvement in UPDRS Scores |
title_sort | investigation of apomorphine during sleep in parkinson’s: improvement in updrs scores |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908956/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31871600 http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ni.2019.8207 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pieronimiguela investigationofapomorphineduringsleepinparkinsonsimprovementinupdrsscores |