Cargando…

Evaluation of skin dose calculation factors in interventional fluoroscopy

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure fluoroscopic dose calculation factors for modern fluoroscopy‐guided interventional (FGI) systems, and to fit to analytical functions for peak skin dose (PSD) calculation. METHODS: Table transmission factor (TTF), backscatter factor (BSF), and a newly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: DeLorenzo, Matthew C., Goode, Allen R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31568663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12725
_version_ 1783478889902768128
author DeLorenzo, Matthew C.
Goode, Allen R.
author_facet DeLorenzo, Matthew C.
Goode, Allen R.
author_sort DeLorenzo, Matthew C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure fluoroscopic dose calculation factors for modern fluoroscopy‐guided interventional (FGI) systems, and to fit to analytical functions for peak skin dose (PSD) calculation. METHODS: Table transmission factor (TTF), backscatter factor (BSF), and a newly termed kerma correction factor (KCF) were measured for two interventional fluoroscopy systems. For each setup, air kerma rates were measured using a small ionization chamber in fluoroscopic service mode while selecting kVp, copper (Cu) filter thickness, incident angle, and x‐ray field size at the assumed patient skin locations. Angle dependency on KCF was measured on the GE system at isocenter for angles of 0, 15, 30, and 40 degrees, using a range of kVp, Cu filters, and one field size. An analytical equation was created to fit the data to facilitate PSD calculation. RESULTS: For the GE system, oblique incidence measurements show KCF decreased by about 2%, 8%, and 13% for incident angles of 15, 30, and 40°, respectively, relative to KCF at 0 degree. The GE and Siemens systems' KCFs ranged from 0.89 to 1.45, and 0.64 to 1.44, respectively. The KCFs increased with a power of field size, and generally increased with kVp and Cu filter. The average percentage difference between TTF × BSF × f and KCF was 16% at normal incidence. The KCF data were successfully fitted to function of angle, field size, kVp, and Cu filter thickness using seven parameters, with an average R‐squared value of 0.98 and maximum percentage difference of 6.0%. CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluated scatter factors for two fluoroscopy systems, and dependencies on angle, kVp, Cu filter, and field size, with emphasis on under table beam orientations. Analytical fitting of the data with exposure parameters may facilitate PSD calculations, and more accurately determine the potential for radiation‐induced skin injury.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6909123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69091232019-12-20 Evaluation of skin dose calculation factors in interventional fluoroscopy DeLorenzo, Matthew C. Goode, Allen R. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Measurements PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure fluoroscopic dose calculation factors for modern fluoroscopy‐guided interventional (FGI) systems, and to fit to analytical functions for peak skin dose (PSD) calculation. METHODS: Table transmission factor (TTF), backscatter factor (BSF), and a newly termed kerma correction factor (KCF) were measured for two interventional fluoroscopy systems. For each setup, air kerma rates were measured using a small ionization chamber in fluoroscopic service mode while selecting kVp, copper (Cu) filter thickness, incident angle, and x‐ray field size at the assumed patient skin locations. Angle dependency on KCF was measured on the GE system at isocenter for angles of 0, 15, 30, and 40 degrees, using a range of kVp, Cu filters, and one field size. An analytical equation was created to fit the data to facilitate PSD calculation. RESULTS: For the GE system, oblique incidence measurements show KCF decreased by about 2%, 8%, and 13% for incident angles of 15, 30, and 40°, respectively, relative to KCF at 0 degree. The GE and Siemens systems' KCFs ranged from 0.89 to 1.45, and 0.64 to 1.44, respectively. The KCFs increased with a power of field size, and generally increased with kVp and Cu filter. The average percentage difference between TTF × BSF × f and KCF was 16% at normal incidence. The KCF data were successfully fitted to function of angle, field size, kVp, and Cu filter thickness using seven parameters, with an average R‐squared value of 0.98 and maximum percentage difference of 6.0%. CONCLUSIONS: This study evaluated scatter factors for two fluoroscopy systems, and dependencies on angle, kVp, Cu filter, and field size, with emphasis on under table beam orientations. Analytical fitting of the data with exposure parameters may facilitate PSD calculations, and more accurately determine the potential for radiation‐induced skin injury. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC6909123/ /pubmed/31568663 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12725 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Measurements
DeLorenzo, Matthew C.
Goode, Allen R.
Evaluation of skin dose calculation factors in interventional fluoroscopy
title Evaluation of skin dose calculation factors in interventional fluoroscopy
title_full Evaluation of skin dose calculation factors in interventional fluoroscopy
title_fullStr Evaluation of skin dose calculation factors in interventional fluoroscopy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of skin dose calculation factors in interventional fluoroscopy
title_short Evaluation of skin dose calculation factors in interventional fluoroscopy
title_sort evaluation of skin dose calculation factors in interventional fluoroscopy
topic Radiation Measurements
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31568663
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12725
work_keys_str_mv AT delorenzomatthewc evaluationofskindosecalculationfactorsininterventionalfluoroscopy
AT goodeallenr evaluationofskindosecalculationfactorsininterventionalfluoroscopy