Cargando…

A survey of surface imaging use in radiation oncology in the United States

Surface imaging (SI) has been rapidly integrated into radiotherapy clinics across the country without specific guidelines and recommendations on its commissioning and use aside from vendor‐provided information. A survey was created under the auspices of AAPM TG‐302 to assess the current status of SI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Padilla, Laura, Havnen‐Smith, Amanda, Cerviño, Laura, Al‐Hallaq, Hania A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31743588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12762
_version_ 1783478901381529600
author Padilla, Laura
Havnen‐Smith, Amanda
Cerviño, Laura
Al‐Hallaq, Hania A.
author_facet Padilla, Laura
Havnen‐Smith, Amanda
Cerviño, Laura
Al‐Hallaq, Hania A.
author_sort Padilla, Laura
collection PubMed
description Surface imaging (SI) has been rapidly integrated into radiotherapy clinics across the country without specific guidelines and recommendations on its commissioning and use aside from vendor‐provided information. A survey was created under the auspices of AAPM TG‐302 to assess the current status of SI to identify if there is need for formal guidance. The survey was designed to determine the institutional setting of responders, availability and length of its use, commissioning procedures, and clinical applications. This survey was created in REDCap, and approved as IRB exempt to collect anonymized data. Questions were reviewed by multiple physicists to ensure concept validity and piloted by a small group of independent physicists to ensure process validity. All full members of AAPM self‐identified as “therapy” or “other” were sent the survey link by email. The survey was active from February to March 2018. Of 3677 members successfully contacted, 439 completed responses; the summary of these responses provides insight on current surface imaging clinical practices, though they should not be assumed to be representative of radiation oncology as a whole. Results showed that 53.3% of respondents have SI in their clinics, mostly in treatment rooms, rarely in simulation rooms. Half of those without SI plan on purchasing it within 3 years. Over 10% have SI but do not use it clinically, 36.8% classify themselves as “expert” users, and 85.5% agreed/strongly agreed that SI guidelines are needed. Initial positioning with SI is most common for breast/chestwall and SRS/SBRT treatments, least common for pediatrics. Use of SI for intra‐fraction monitoring follows a similar distribution. Gating with SI is most prevalent for breast/chestwall (66.0%) but also used in SBRT (33.0%), and non‐SBRT lung/abdomen (<30%) treatments. SI is a rapidly growing technology in the field with widespread use for several anatomic sites. Guidelines and recommendations on commissioning and clinical use are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6909172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69091722019-12-20 A survey of surface imaging use in radiation oncology in the United States Padilla, Laura Havnen‐Smith, Amanda Cerviño, Laura Al‐Hallaq, Hania A. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics Surface imaging (SI) has been rapidly integrated into radiotherapy clinics across the country without specific guidelines and recommendations on its commissioning and use aside from vendor‐provided information. A survey was created under the auspices of AAPM TG‐302 to assess the current status of SI to identify if there is need for formal guidance. The survey was designed to determine the institutional setting of responders, availability and length of its use, commissioning procedures, and clinical applications. This survey was created in REDCap, and approved as IRB exempt to collect anonymized data. Questions were reviewed by multiple physicists to ensure concept validity and piloted by a small group of independent physicists to ensure process validity. All full members of AAPM self‐identified as “therapy” or “other” were sent the survey link by email. The survey was active from February to March 2018. Of 3677 members successfully contacted, 439 completed responses; the summary of these responses provides insight on current surface imaging clinical practices, though they should not be assumed to be representative of radiation oncology as a whole. Results showed that 53.3% of respondents have SI in their clinics, mostly in treatment rooms, rarely in simulation rooms. Half of those without SI plan on purchasing it within 3 years. Over 10% have SI but do not use it clinically, 36.8% classify themselves as “expert” users, and 85.5% agreed/strongly agreed that SI guidelines are needed. Initial positioning with SI is most common for breast/chestwall and SRS/SBRT treatments, least common for pediatrics. Use of SI for intra‐fraction monitoring follows a similar distribution. Gating with SI is most prevalent for breast/chestwall (66.0%) but also used in SBRT (33.0%), and non‐SBRT lung/abdomen (<30%) treatments. SI is a rapidly growing technology in the field with widespread use for several anatomic sites. Guidelines and recommendations on commissioning and clinical use are warranted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6909172/ /pubmed/31743588 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12762 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Padilla, Laura
Havnen‐Smith, Amanda
Cerviño, Laura
Al‐Hallaq, Hania A.
A survey of surface imaging use in radiation oncology in the United States
title A survey of surface imaging use in radiation oncology in the United States
title_full A survey of surface imaging use in radiation oncology in the United States
title_fullStr A survey of surface imaging use in radiation oncology in the United States
title_full_unstemmed A survey of surface imaging use in radiation oncology in the United States
title_short A survey of surface imaging use in radiation oncology in the United States
title_sort survey of surface imaging use in radiation oncology in the united states
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31743588
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12762
work_keys_str_mv AT padillalaura asurveyofsurfaceimaginguseinradiationoncologyintheunitedstates
AT havnensmithamanda asurveyofsurfaceimaginguseinradiationoncologyintheunitedstates
AT cervinolaura asurveyofsurfaceimaginguseinradiationoncologyintheunitedstates
AT alhallaqhaniaa asurveyofsurfaceimaginguseinradiationoncologyintheunitedstates
AT padillalaura surveyofsurfaceimaginguseinradiationoncologyintheunitedstates
AT havnensmithamanda surveyofsurfaceimaginguseinradiationoncologyintheunitedstates
AT cervinolaura surveyofsurfaceimaginguseinradiationoncologyintheunitedstates
AT alhallaqhaniaa surveyofsurfaceimaginguseinradiationoncologyintheunitedstates