Cargando…

Association of daily copayments with use of hospital care among medicare advantage enrollees

BACKGROUND: While the traditional Medicare program imposes a deductible for hospital admissions, many Medicare Advantage plans have instituted per-diem copayments for hospital care. Little evidence exists about the effects of changes in cost-sharing for hospital care among the elderly. Changing inpa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McHugh, John P., Keohane, Laura, Grebla, Regina, Lee, Yoojin, Trivedi, Amal N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4770-1
_version_ 1783478940449374208
author McHugh, John P.
Keohane, Laura
Grebla, Regina
Lee, Yoojin
Trivedi, Amal N.
author_facet McHugh, John P.
Keohane, Laura
Grebla, Regina
Lee, Yoojin
Trivedi, Amal N.
author_sort McHugh, John P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While the traditional Medicare program imposes a deductible for hospital admissions, many Medicare Advantage plans have instituted per-diem copayments for hospital care. Little evidence exists about the effects of changes in cost-sharing for hospital care among the elderly. Changing inpatient benefits from a deductible to a per diem may benefit enrollees with shorter lengths of stay, but adversely affect the out-of-pocket burden for hospitalized enrollees with longer lengths of stay. METHODS: We used a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study to compare longitudinal changes in proportion hospitalized, inpatient admissions and days per 100 enrollees, and hospital length of stay between enrollees in MA plans that changed inpatient benefit from deductible at admission to per diem, intervention plans, and enrollees in matched control plans – similar plans that maintained inpatient deductibles. The study population included 423,634 unique beneficiaries enrolled in 23 intervention plans and 36 matched control plans in the 2007–2010 period. RESULTS: The imposition of per-diem copayments were associated with adjusted declines of 1.3 admissions/100 enrollees (95% CI − 1.8 to − 0.9), 6.9 inpatient days/100 enrollees (95% CI − 10.1 to − 3.8) and 0.7 percentage points in the probability of hospital admission (95% CI − 1.0 to − 0.4), with no significant change in adjusted length of stay in intervention plans relative to control plans. For persons with 2 or more hospitalizations in the year prior to the cost-sharing change, adjusted declines were 3.5 admissions/100 (95% CI − 8.4 to 1.4), 31.1 days/100 (95% CI − 75.2 to 13.0) and 2.2 percentage points in the probability of hospitalization (95% CI − 3.8 to − 0.6) in intervention plans relative to control plans. CONCLUSIONS: Instituting per-diem copayments was associated with reductions in number of admissions and hospital stays, but not length of stay once admitted. Effects of inpatient cost-sharing changes were magnified for persons with greater baseline use of hospital care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6909444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69094442019-12-19 Association of daily copayments with use of hospital care among medicare advantage enrollees McHugh, John P. Keohane, Laura Grebla, Regina Lee, Yoojin Trivedi, Amal N. BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: While the traditional Medicare program imposes a deductible for hospital admissions, many Medicare Advantage plans have instituted per-diem copayments for hospital care. Little evidence exists about the effects of changes in cost-sharing for hospital care among the elderly. Changing inpatient benefits from a deductible to a per diem may benefit enrollees with shorter lengths of stay, but adversely affect the out-of-pocket burden for hospitalized enrollees with longer lengths of stay. METHODS: We used a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences study to compare longitudinal changes in proportion hospitalized, inpatient admissions and days per 100 enrollees, and hospital length of stay between enrollees in MA plans that changed inpatient benefit from deductible at admission to per diem, intervention plans, and enrollees in matched control plans – similar plans that maintained inpatient deductibles. The study population included 423,634 unique beneficiaries enrolled in 23 intervention plans and 36 matched control plans in the 2007–2010 period. RESULTS: The imposition of per-diem copayments were associated with adjusted declines of 1.3 admissions/100 enrollees (95% CI − 1.8 to − 0.9), 6.9 inpatient days/100 enrollees (95% CI − 10.1 to − 3.8) and 0.7 percentage points in the probability of hospital admission (95% CI − 1.0 to − 0.4), with no significant change in adjusted length of stay in intervention plans relative to control plans. For persons with 2 or more hospitalizations in the year prior to the cost-sharing change, adjusted declines were 3.5 admissions/100 (95% CI − 8.4 to 1.4), 31.1 days/100 (95% CI − 75.2 to 13.0) and 2.2 percentage points in the probability of hospitalization (95% CI − 3.8 to − 0.6) in intervention plans relative to control plans. CONCLUSIONS: Instituting per-diem copayments was associated with reductions in number of admissions and hospital stays, but not length of stay once admitted. Effects of inpatient cost-sharing changes were magnified for persons with greater baseline use of hospital care. BioMed Central 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6909444/ /pubmed/31830987 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4770-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
McHugh, John P.
Keohane, Laura
Grebla, Regina
Lee, Yoojin
Trivedi, Amal N.
Association of daily copayments with use of hospital care among medicare advantage enrollees
title Association of daily copayments with use of hospital care among medicare advantage enrollees
title_full Association of daily copayments with use of hospital care among medicare advantage enrollees
title_fullStr Association of daily copayments with use of hospital care among medicare advantage enrollees
title_full_unstemmed Association of daily copayments with use of hospital care among medicare advantage enrollees
title_short Association of daily copayments with use of hospital care among medicare advantage enrollees
title_sort association of daily copayments with use of hospital care among medicare advantage enrollees
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830987
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4770-1
work_keys_str_mv AT mchughjohnp associationofdailycopaymentswithuseofhospitalcareamongmedicareadvantageenrollees
AT keohanelaura associationofdailycopaymentswithuseofhospitalcareamongmedicareadvantageenrollees
AT greblaregina associationofdailycopaymentswithuseofhospitalcareamongmedicareadvantageenrollees
AT leeyoojin associationofdailycopaymentswithuseofhospitalcareamongmedicareadvantageenrollees
AT trivediamaln associationofdailycopaymentswithuseofhospitalcareamongmedicareadvantageenrollees