Cargando…

Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation

BACKGROUND: There have been few comparisons between dual positions, which require a position change, and a single position, which does not require position change, and it is not clear whether there is a difference in indirect decompression achieved by the two procedures. Therefore, the purpose of th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hiyama, Akihiko, Katoh, Hiroyuki, Sakai, Daisuke, Sato, Masato, Tanaka, Masahiro, Watanabe, Masahiko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2992-3
_version_ 1783478944960348160
author Hiyama, Akihiko
Katoh, Hiroyuki
Sakai, Daisuke
Sato, Masato
Tanaka, Masahiro
Watanabe, Masahiko
author_facet Hiyama, Akihiko
Katoh, Hiroyuki
Sakai, Daisuke
Sato, Masato
Tanaka, Masahiro
Watanabe, Masahiko
author_sort Hiyama, Akihiko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There have been few comparisons between dual positions, which require a position change, and a single position, which does not require position change, and it is not clear whether there is a difference in indirect decompression achieved by the two procedures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare perioperative and radiographic outcomes following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in two cohorts of patients who underwent surgery in a single position or dual position. METHODS: This study involved 45 patients who underwent indirect decompression at 68 levels, with LLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal canal stenosis. Patient demographics and perioperative data were compared between two groups: patients who remained in the lateral decubitus position for pedicle screw fixation (SP group) and those turned to the prone position (DP group). RESULTS: A total of 26 DP and 19 SP patients were analyzed. The operation time was approximately 31 min longer for the DP group (129.7 ± 36.0 min) than for the SP group (98.4 ± 41.3 min, P < 0.01). We also evaluated the pre- and postoperative image measurements, there was no significant difference for lumbar lordosis, segmental disc angle, slipping length, and disc height between the groups. The CSA of the dural sac (DP group, from 55.3 to 78.4 mm(2); SP group, from 54.7 to 77.2 mm(2)) and central canal diameter (DP group, from 5.9 to 7.9 mm; SP group, from 5.6 to 7.7 mm) was significantly larger after surgery in both groups. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.684). CONCLUSIONS: SP surgery could reduce the average surgery time by about 31 min. We found that the effect of indirect decompression by SP-PPS fixation following LLIF was considered to be a useful technique with no difference in dural sac enlargement or disc angle obtained compared with DP-PPS fixation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6909463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69094632019-12-19 Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation Hiyama, Akihiko Katoh, Hiroyuki Sakai, Daisuke Sato, Masato Tanaka, Masahiro Watanabe, Masahiko BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: There have been few comparisons between dual positions, which require a position change, and a single position, which does not require position change, and it is not clear whether there is a difference in indirect decompression achieved by the two procedures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare perioperative and radiographic outcomes following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) in two cohorts of patients who underwent surgery in a single position or dual position. METHODS: This study involved 45 patients who underwent indirect decompression at 68 levels, with LLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) fixation for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal canal stenosis. Patient demographics and perioperative data were compared between two groups: patients who remained in the lateral decubitus position for pedicle screw fixation (SP group) and those turned to the prone position (DP group). RESULTS: A total of 26 DP and 19 SP patients were analyzed. The operation time was approximately 31 min longer for the DP group (129.7 ± 36.0 min) than for the SP group (98.4 ± 41.3 min, P < 0.01). We also evaluated the pre- and postoperative image measurements, there was no significant difference for lumbar lordosis, segmental disc angle, slipping length, and disc height between the groups. The CSA of the dural sac (DP group, from 55.3 to 78.4 mm(2); SP group, from 54.7 to 77.2 mm(2)) and central canal diameter (DP group, from 5.9 to 7.9 mm; SP group, from 5.6 to 7.7 mm) was significantly larger after surgery in both groups. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups (P = 0.684). CONCLUSIONS: SP surgery could reduce the average surgery time by about 31 min. We found that the effect of indirect decompression by SP-PPS fixation following LLIF was considered to be a useful technique with no difference in dural sac enlargement or disc angle obtained compared with DP-PPS fixation. BioMed Central 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6909463/ /pubmed/31830959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2992-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hiyama, Akihiko
Katoh, Hiroyuki
Sakai, Daisuke
Sato, Masato
Tanaka, Masahiro
Watanabe, Masahiko
Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation
title Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation
title_full Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation
title_fullStr Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation
title_short Comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation
title_sort comparison of radiological changes after single- position versus dual- position for lateral interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2992-3
work_keys_str_mv AT hiyamaakihiko comparisonofradiologicalchangesaftersinglepositionversusdualpositionforlateralinterbodyfusionandpediclescrewfixation
AT katohhiroyuki comparisonofradiologicalchangesaftersinglepositionversusdualpositionforlateralinterbodyfusionandpediclescrewfixation
AT sakaidaisuke comparisonofradiologicalchangesaftersinglepositionversusdualpositionforlateralinterbodyfusionandpediclescrewfixation
AT satomasato comparisonofradiologicalchangesaftersinglepositionversusdualpositionforlateralinterbodyfusionandpediclescrewfixation
AT tanakamasahiro comparisonofradiologicalchangesaftersinglepositionversusdualpositionforlateralinterbodyfusionandpediclescrewfixation
AT watanabemasahiko comparisonofradiologicalchangesaftersinglepositionversusdualpositionforlateralinterbodyfusionandpediclescrewfixation