Cargando…

Immunocytochemical expression of Ki-67/p16 in normal, atypical, and neoplastic cells in urine cytology using BD SurePath™ as preparation method

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the expression of Ki-67/p16 in urothelial cells in cytological material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 142 urines including normal controls, anonymous rest urine, controls after treatment for urothelial carcinoma (UC) and newly diagnosed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Østbye, Kirsten Margrethe, Pedersen, Mette Kristin, Sauer, Torill
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31897084
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/cytojournal.cytojournal_9_19
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the expression of Ki-67/p16 in urothelial cells in cytological material. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 142 urines including normal controls, anonymous rest urine, controls after treatment for urothelial carcinoma (UC) and newly diagnosed UC. Immunocytochemistry for ki-67/p16 dual staining kit was performed on all specimens. RESULTS: Eight high-grade UC and six anonymous specimens showed dual positivity. None of the low-grade UC or the control specimens after treated UC showed dual staining. Fifteen of 84 (17.8%) symptomatic cases were negative for both markers, and 59/84 (70.2%) showed positivity for both but not dual staining. Twenty-seven of 84 cases were positive for either Ki-67 (n = 22) or p16 (n = 5). Normal controls and benign specimens were negative for p16. CONCLUSIONS: Co-expression of p16/Ki-67 in the same cells was found in 16.6% of the cases. All were high grade, and co-expression seems to have limited practical impact as an additional marker in urine cytology. Any positivity for p16 alone strongly indicates malignancy. Negative p16 accompanied by a positive Ki-67 rate at 5% or more could be considered as an additional marker for further clinical follow-up. Both markers, co-expressed and separate, can give additional information in follow-up patients after treatment for UC.