Cargando…

Experiences from Decentralised Radiological Services in Norway – a rural case study

BACKGROUND: Implementation of the Norwegian government’s Coordination Reform (2012) aims to decentralise health care services from centralised hospitals to local communities. Radiological services in Norway are mainly organised in hospitals, because of the significant financial and human resource de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Myklebust, Aud Mette, Eide, Hilde, Ellis, Brian, Beattie, Rona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4800-z
_version_ 1783478981144608768
author Myklebust, Aud Mette
Eide, Hilde
Ellis, Brian
Beattie, Rona
author_facet Myklebust, Aud Mette
Eide, Hilde
Ellis, Brian
Beattie, Rona
author_sort Myklebust, Aud Mette
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Implementation of the Norwegian government’s Coordination Reform (2012) aims to decentralise health care services from centralised hospitals to local communities. Radiological services in Norway are mainly organised in hospitals, because of the significant financial and human resource demands engendered by the need for advanced technological equipment, and specialised staff. Some selected conventional x-ray services have been decentralised into rural communities. The purpose of this single case study was to highlight experiences from different stakeholders’ of organising decentralised radiological services in a rural area in Norway. METHODS: A qualitative single case study design was adopted, collected data using focus groups with healthcare professionals and managers to obtain stakeholder’s experiences of the radiological services in this rural area. The key emergent themes from the literature, decentralisation, quality, professional roles, organisation and economic consequences were discussed with each focus group. Thematic analysis was used for analyzing the primary data collected. RESULTS: Four main themes emerged from the focus groups: 1) organisation, 2) quality and safety, 3) funding of radiological services and 4) cooperation between health care professions and health care levels. It was found that the organisation of decentralised radiological services to rural areas is challenging because of the way health services are structured in Norway. The quality of service was found to be inadequate in some areas because of the superficial level of training given to non-radiographic staff. The experience is that the Norwegian funding system hinders an efficient decentralised health care service. Effective cooperation and responsibility between health care professions and levels was challenging. There needs to be improved co-working by clearly defining roles and responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: A key recommendation for the organisation of rural radiological service was the development of a satellite link with an acute hospital. Quality of the service could be improved and should be given priority. Structural change to the financial system whereby money follows patients, might also facilitate more patientcentred services across healthcare levels. Improved mutual understanding between rural radiological services and hospital specialists and managers is important for a high quality and consistent radiological service to be delivered across Norway.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6909618
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69096182019-12-30 Experiences from Decentralised Radiological Services in Norway – a rural case study Myklebust, Aud Mette Eide, Hilde Ellis, Brian Beattie, Rona BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Implementation of the Norwegian government’s Coordination Reform (2012) aims to decentralise health care services from centralised hospitals to local communities. Radiological services in Norway are mainly organised in hospitals, because of the significant financial and human resource demands engendered by the need for advanced technological equipment, and specialised staff. Some selected conventional x-ray services have been decentralised into rural communities. The purpose of this single case study was to highlight experiences from different stakeholders’ of organising decentralised radiological services in a rural area in Norway. METHODS: A qualitative single case study design was adopted, collected data using focus groups with healthcare professionals and managers to obtain stakeholder’s experiences of the radiological services in this rural area. The key emergent themes from the literature, decentralisation, quality, professional roles, organisation and economic consequences were discussed with each focus group. Thematic analysis was used for analyzing the primary data collected. RESULTS: Four main themes emerged from the focus groups: 1) organisation, 2) quality and safety, 3) funding of radiological services and 4) cooperation between health care professions and health care levels. It was found that the organisation of decentralised radiological services to rural areas is challenging because of the way health services are structured in Norway. The quality of service was found to be inadequate in some areas because of the superficial level of training given to non-radiographic staff. The experience is that the Norwegian funding system hinders an efficient decentralised health care service. Effective cooperation and responsibility between health care professions and levels was challenging. There needs to be improved co-working by clearly defining roles and responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: A key recommendation for the organisation of rural radiological service was the development of a satellite link with an acute hospital. Quality of the service could be improved and should be given priority. Structural change to the financial system whereby money follows patients, might also facilitate more patientcentred services across healthcare levels. Improved mutual understanding between rural radiological services and hospital specialists and managers is important for a high quality and consistent radiological service to be delivered across Norway. BioMed Central 2019-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC6909618/ /pubmed/31830968 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4800-z Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Myklebust, Aud Mette
Eide, Hilde
Ellis, Brian
Beattie, Rona
Experiences from Decentralised Radiological Services in Norway – a rural case study
title Experiences from Decentralised Radiological Services in Norway – a rural case study
title_full Experiences from Decentralised Radiological Services in Norway – a rural case study
title_fullStr Experiences from Decentralised Radiological Services in Norway – a rural case study
title_full_unstemmed Experiences from Decentralised Radiological Services in Norway – a rural case study
title_short Experiences from Decentralised Radiological Services in Norway – a rural case study
title_sort experiences from decentralised radiological services in norway – a rural case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909618/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31830968
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4800-z
work_keys_str_mv AT myklebustaudmette experiencesfromdecentralisedradiologicalservicesinnorwayaruralcasestudy
AT eidehilde experiencesfromdecentralisedradiologicalservicesinnorwayaruralcasestudy
AT ellisbrian experiencesfromdecentralisedradiologicalservicesinnorwayaruralcasestudy
AT beattierona experiencesfromdecentralisedradiologicalservicesinnorwayaruralcasestudy