Cargando…

Underlying Differences Between Chinese Omnivores and Vegetarians in the Evaluations of Different Dietary Groups

Drawing upon self-categorization theory, the present research investigated the attitudes of omnivores and vegetarians toward five dietary groups, including omnivores, conscientious omnivores, semi-vegetarians, vegetarians, and vegans. When they had high (vs. low) meat rationalization, omnivore parti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tian, Qirui, Zheng, Qingyang, Li, Shouxin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866889
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02644
_version_ 1783479016482668544
author Tian, Qirui
Zheng, Qingyang
Li, Shouxin
author_facet Tian, Qirui
Zheng, Qingyang
Li, Shouxin
author_sort Tian, Qirui
collection PubMed
description Drawing upon self-categorization theory, the present research investigated the attitudes of omnivores and vegetarians toward five dietary groups, including omnivores, conscientious omnivores, semi-vegetarians, vegetarians, and vegans. When they had high (vs. low) meat rationalization, omnivore participants had fewer negative attitudes toward and more positive evaluations of the omnivore groups but more negative attitudes toward and fewer positive evaluations of the vegetarian groups. Vegetarian participants had the most negative attitudes toward the omnivore group, followed by the conscientious omnivore group, the semi-vegetarian group, the vegetarian group, and the vegan group; the vegetarian participants with high meat rationalization (vs. those with low meat rationalization) had more positive evaluations of the omnivore groups. Such findings suggested that high levels of meat-eating rationalization predicted more favorable attitudes toward omnivores among both omnivore and vegetarian participants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6909885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69098852019-12-20 Underlying Differences Between Chinese Omnivores and Vegetarians in the Evaluations of Different Dietary Groups Tian, Qirui Zheng, Qingyang Li, Shouxin Front Psychol Psychology Drawing upon self-categorization theory, the present research investigated the attitudes of omnivores and vegetarians toward five dietary groups, including omnivores, conscientious omnivores, semi-vegetarians, vegetarians, and vegans. When they had high (vs. low) meat rationalization, omnivore participants had fewer negative attitudes toward and more positive evaluations of the omnivore groups but more negative attitudes toward and fewer positive evaluations of the vegetarian groups. Vegetarian participants had the most negative attitudes toward the omnivore group, followed by the conscientious omnivore group, the semi-vegetarian group, the vegetarian group, and the vegan group; the vegetarian participants with high meat rationalization (vs. those with low meat rationalization) had more positive evaluations of the omnivore groups. Such findings suggested that high levels of meat-eating rationalization predicted more favorable attitudes toward omnivores among both omnivore and vegetarian participants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6909885/ /pubmed/31866889 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02644 Text en Copyright © 2019 Tian, Zheng and Li. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Tian, Qirui
Zheng, Qingyang
Li, Shouxin
Underlying Differences Between Chinese Omnivores and Vegetarians in the Evaluations of Different Dietary Groups
title Underlying Differences Between Chinese Omnivores and Vegetarians in the Evaluations of Different Dietary Groups
title_full Underlying Differences Between Chinese Omnivores and Vegetarians in the Evaluations of Different Dietary Groups
title_fullStr Underlying Differences Between Chinese Omnivores and Vegetarians in the Evaluations of Different Dietary Groups
title_full_unstemmed Underlying Differences Between Chinese Omnivores and Vegetarians in the Evaluations of Different Dietary Groups
title_short Underlying Differences Between Chinese Omnivores and Vegetarians in the Evaluations of Different Dietary Groups
title_sort underlying differences between chinese omnivores and vegetarians in the evaluations of different dietary groups
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31866889
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02644
work_keys_str_mv AT tianqirui underlyingdifferencesbetweenchineseomnivoresandvegetariansintheevaluationsofdifferentdietarygroups
AT zhengqingyang underlyingdifferencesbetweenchineseomnivoresandvegetariansintheevaluationsofdifferentdietarygroups
AT lishouxin underlyingdifferencesbetweenchineseomnivoresandvegetariansintheevaluationsofdifferentdietarygroups