Cargando…

Cortical markers of auditory stream segregation revealed for streaming based on tonotopy but not pitch

The brain decomposes mixtures of sounds, such as competing talkers, into perceptual streams that can be attended to individually. Attention can enhance the cortical representation of streams, but it is unknown what acoustic features the enhancement reflects, or where in the auditory pathways attenti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruggles, Dorea R., Tausend, Alexis N., Shamma, Shihab A., Oxenham, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Acoustical Society of America 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30404514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5065392
_version_ 1783479031951261696
author Ruggles, Dorea R.
Tausend, Alexis N.
Shamma, Shihab A.
Oxenham, Andrew J.
author_facet Ruggles, Dorea R.
Tausend, Alexis N.
Shamma, Shihab A.
Oxenham, Andrew J.
author_sort Ruggles, Dorea R.
collection PubMed
description The brain decomposes mixtures of sounds, such as competing talkers, into perceptual streams that can be attended to individually. Attention can enhance the cortical representation of streams, but it is unknown what acoustic features the enhancement reflects, or where in the auditory pathways attentional enhancement is first observed. Here, behavioral measures of streaming were combined with simultaneous low- and high-frequency envelope-following responses (EFR) that are thought to originate primarily from cortical and subcortical regions, respectively. Repeating triplets of harmonic complex tones were presented with alternating fundamental frequencies. The tones were filtered to contain either low-numbered spectrally resolved harmonics, or only high-numbered unresolved harmonics. The behavioral results confirmed that segregation can be based on either tonotopic or pitch cues. The EFR results revealed no effects of streaming or attention on subcortical responses. Cortical responses revealed attentional enhancement under conditions of streaming, but only when tonotopic cues were available, not when streaming was based only on pitch cues. The results suggest that the attentional modulation of phase-locked responses is dominated by tonotopically tuned cortical neurons that are insensitive to pitch or periodicity cues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6909992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Acoustical Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69099922019-12-19 Cortical markers of auditory stream segregation revealed for streaming based on tonotopy but not pitch Ruggles, Dorea R. Tausend, Alexis N. Shamma, Shihab A. Oxenham, Andrew J. J Acoust Soc Am Psychological and Physiological Acoustics The brain decomposes mixtures of sounds, such as competing talkers, into perceptual streams that can be attended to individually. Attention can enhance the cortical representation of streams, but it is unknown what acoustic features the enhancement reflects, or where in the auditory pathways attentional enhancement is first observed. Here, behavioral measures of streaming were combined with simultaneous low- and high-frequency envelope-following responses (EFR) that are thought to originate primarily from cortical and subcortical regions, respectively. Repeating triplets of harmonic complex tones were presented with alternating fundamental frequencies. The tones were filtered to contain either low-numbered spectrally resolved harmonics, or only high-numbered unresolved harmonics. The behavioral results confirmed that segregation can be based on either tonotopic or pitch cues. The EFR results revealed no effects of streaming or attention on subcortical responses. Cortical responses revealed attentional enhancement under conditions of streaming, but only when tonotopic cues were available, not when streaming was based only on pitch cues. The results suggest that the attentional modulation of phase-locked responses is dominated by tonotopically tuned cortical neurons that are insensitive to pitch or periodicity cues. Acoustical Society of America 2018-10 2018-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6909992/ /pubmed/30404514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5065392 Text en © 2018 Author(s). 0001-4966/2018/144(4)/2424/10 All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Psychological and Physiological Acoustics
Ruggles, Dorea R.
Tausend, Alexis N.
Shamma, Shihab A.
Oxenham, Andrew J.
Cortical markers of auditory stream segregation revealed for streaming based on tonotopy but not pitch
title Cortical markers of auditory stream segregation revealed for streaming based on tonotopy but not pitch
title_full Cortical markers of auditory stream segregation revealed for streaming based on tonotopy but not pitch
title_fullStr Cortical markers of auditory stream segregation revealed for streaming based on tonotopy but not pitch
title_full_unstemmed Cortical markers of auditory stream segregation revealed for streaming based on tonotopy but not pitch
title_short Cortical markers of auditory stream segregation revealed for streaming based on tonotopy but not pitch
title_sort cortical markers of auditory stream segregation revealed for streaming based on tonotopy but not pitch
topic Psychological and Physiological Acoustics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6909992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30404514
http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5065392
work_keys_str_mv AT rugglesdorear corticalmarkersofauditorystreamsegregationrevealedforstreamingbasedontonotopybutnotpitch
AT tausendalexisn corticalmarkersofauditorystreamsegregationrevealedforstreamingbasedontonotopybutnotpitch
AT shammashihaba corticalmarkersofauditorystreamsegregationrevealedforstreamingbasedontonotopybutnotpitch
AT oxenhamandrewj corticalmarkersofauditorystreamsegregationrevealedforstreamingbasedontonotopybutnotpitch