Cargando…
Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile
AIMS: To define midfacial position differentiating maxillary and zygomatic regions and to evaluate the corresponding cephalometric characteristics discerning midfacial flatness and fullness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 183 pretreatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of non-growing orthodonti...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844585 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8200 |
_version_ | 1783479050771103744 |
---|---|
author | Chalala, Chimène Ghafari, Joseph G. |
author_facet | Chalala, Chimène Ghafari, Joseph G. |
author_sort | Chalala, Chimène |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To define midfacial position differentiating maxillary and zygomatic regions and to evaluate the corresponding cephalometric characteristics discerning midfacial flatness and fullness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 183 pretreatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of non-growing orthodontic patients (age 25.98 ± 8.43 years) screened at our university orthodontic clinic. The lateral cephalographs of the orthodontic patients were stratified in four groups: flat, normal toward flat, normal toward full, full,according to distances from nasion and sella to points J and G (NJ, SJ, NG and SG). J is the midpoint of the distance connecting orbitale to point A, and G the center of the triangle connecting orbit, key ridge and pterygomaxillary fissure. Statistics included the Kendall tau-b test for best associations among measurements. RESULTS: All measurements were statistically significantly different between flat and full groups. The highest associations were between NJ and SJ (τb = 0.71; p < 0.001) and NG and SG (τb = 0.70; p < 0.001). Flat midfaces were characterized by canting of the cranial base and palatal plane, hyperdivergent pattern and maxillary retrognathism. The opposite was true for fuller midfaces. CONCLUSION: Midface skeletal location was assessed differentially in the naso-maxillary and malo-zygomatic structures differentially. Craniofacial characteristics were identified according to this stratification, indicating the potential for application in facial diagnosis and need for testing on 3D cone-beam computed tomography images. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6910109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69101092019-12-16 Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile Chalala, Chimène Ghafari, Joseph G. PeerJ Anatomy and Physiology AIMS: To define midfacial position differentiating maxillary and zygomatic regions and to evaluate the corresponding cephalometric characteristics discerning midfacial flatness and fullness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 183 pretreatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of non-growing orthodontic patients (age 25.98 ± 8.43 years) screened at our university orthodontic clinic. The lateral cephalographs of the orthodontic patients were stratified in four groups: flat, normal toward flat, normal toward full, full,according to distances from nasion and sella to points J and G (NJ, SJ, NG and SG). J is the midpoint of the distance connecting orbitale to point A, and G the center of the triangle connecting orbit, key ridge and pterygomaxillary fissure. Statistics included the Kendall tau-b test for best associations among measurements. RESULTS: All measurements were statistically significantly different between flat and full groups. The highest associations were between NJ and SJ (τb = 0.71; p < 0.001) and NG and SG (τb = 0.70; p < 0.001). Flat midfaces were characterized by canting of the cranial base and palatal plane, hyperdivergent pattern and maxillary retrognathism. The opposite was true for fuller midfaces. CONCLUSION: Midface skeletal location was assessed differentially in the naso-maxillary and malo-zygomatic structures differentially. Craniofacial characteristics were identified according to this stratification, indicating the potential for application in facial diagnosis and need for testing on 3D cone-beam computed tomography images. PeerJ Inc. 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6910109/ /pubmed/31844585 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8200 Text en © 2019 Chalala and Ghafari https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Anatomy and Physiology Chalala, Chimène Ghafari, Joseph G. Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile |
title | Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile |
title_full | Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile |
title_fullStr | Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile |
title_full_unstemmed | Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile |
title_short | Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile |
title_sort | differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile |
topic | Anatomy and Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844585 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8200 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chalalachimene differentiationbetweenmaxillaryandmalarmidfacepositionwithinthefacialprofile AT ghafarijosephg differentiationbetweenmaxillaryandmalarmidfacepositionwithinthefacialprofile |