Cargando…

Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile

AIMS: To define midfacial position differentiating maxillary and zygomatic regions and to evaluate the corresponding cephalometric characteristics discerning midfacial flatness and fullness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 183 pretreatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of non-growing orthodonti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chalala, Chimène, Ghafari, Joseph G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844585
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8200
_version_ 1783479050771103744
author Chalala, Chimène
Ghafari, Joseph G.
author_facet Chalala, Chimène
Ghafari, Joseph G.
author_sort Chalala, Chimène
collection PubMed
description AIMS: To define midfacial position differentiating maxillary and zygomatic regions and to evaluate the corresponding cephalometric characteristics discerning midfacial flatness and fullness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 183 pretreatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of non-growing orthodontic patients (age 25.98 ± 8.43 years) screened at our university orthodontic clinic. The lateral cephalographs of the orthodontic patients were stratified in four groups: flat, normal toward flat, normal toward full, full,according to distances from nasion and sella to points J and G (NJ, SJ, NG and SG). J is the midpoint of the distance connecting orbitale to point A, and G the center of the triangle connecting orbit, key ridge and pterygomaxillary fissure. Statistics included the Kendall tau-b test for best associations among measurements. RESULTS: All measurements were statistically significantly different between flat and full groups. The highest associations were between NJ and SJ (τb = 0.71; p < 0.001) and NG and SG (τb = 0.70; p < 0.001). Flat midfaces were characterized by canting of the cranial base and palatal plane, hyperdivergent pattern and maxillary retrognathism. The opposite was true for fuller midfaces. CONCLUSION: Midface skeletal location was assessed differentially in the naso-maxillary and malo-zygomatic structures differentially. Craniofacial characteristics were identified according to this stratification, indicating the potential for application in facial diagnosis and need for testing on 3D cone-beam computed tomography images.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6910109
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69101092019-12-16 Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile Chalala, Chimène Ghafari, Joseph G. PeerJ Anatomy and Physiology AIMS: To define midfacial position differentiating maxillary and zygomatic regions and to evaluate the corresponding cephalometric characteristics discerning midfacial flatness and fullness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 183 pretreatment lateral cephalometric radiographs of non-growing orthodontic patients (age 25.98 ± 8.43 years) screened at our university orthodontic clinic. The lateral cephalographs of the orthodontic patients were stratified in four groups: flat, normal toward flat, normal toward full, full,according to distances from nasion and sella to points J and G (NJ, SJ, NG and SG). J is the midpoint of the distance connecting orbitale to point A, and G the center of the triangle connecting orbit, key ridge and pterygomaxillary fissure. Statistics included the Kendall tau-b test for best associations among measurements. RESULTS: All measurements were statistically significantly different between flat and full groups. The highest associations were between NJ and SJ (τb = 0.71; p < 0.001) and NG and SG (τb = 0.70; p < 0.001). Flat midfaces were characterized by canting of the cranial base and palatal plane, hyperdivergent pattern and maxillary retrognathism. The opposite was true for fuller midfaces. CONCLUSION: Midface skeletal location was assessed differentially in the naso-maxillary and malo-zygomatic structures differentially. Craniofacial characteristics were identified according to this stratification, indicating the potential for application in facial diagnosis and need for testing on 3D cone-beam computed tomography images. PeerJ Inc. 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6910109/ /pubmed/31844585 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8200 Text en © 2019 Chalala and Ghafari https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Anatomy and Physiology
Chalala, Chimène
Ghafari, Joseph G.
Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile
title Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile
title_full Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile
title_fullStr Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile
title_full_unstemmed Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile
title_short Differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile
title_sort differentiation between maxillary and malar midface position within the facial profile
topic Anatomy and Physiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910109/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31844585
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8200
work_keys_str_mv AT chalalachimene differentiationbetweenmaxillaryandmalarmidfacepositionwithinthefacialprofile
AT ghafarijosephg differentiationbetweenmaxillaryandmalarmidfacepositionwithinthefacialprofile