Cargando…
Continuous quality improvement methodology: a case study on multidisciplinary collaboration to improve chlamydia screening
This article illustrates quality improvement (QI) methodology using an example intended to improve chlamydia screening in women. QI projects in healthcare provide great opportunities to improve patient quality and safety in a real-world healthcare setting, yet many academic centres lack training pro...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000085 |
_version_ | 1783479147494899712 |
---|---|
author | Ursu, Allison Greenberg, Grant McKee, Michael |
author_facet | Ursu, Allison Greenberg, Grant McKee, Michael |
author_sort | Ursu, Allison |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article illustrates quality improvement (QI) methodology using an example intended to improve chlamydia screening in women. QI projects in healthcare provide great opportunities to improve patient quality and safety in a real-world healthcare setting, yet many academic centres lack training programmes on how to conduct QI projects. The choice of chlamydia screening was based on the significant health burden chlamydia poses despite simple ways to screen and treat. At the University of Michigan, we implemented a multidepartment process to improve the chlamydia screening rates using the plan-do-check-act model. Steps to guide QI projects include the following: (1) assemble a motivated team of stakeholders and leaders; (2) identify the problem that is considered a high priority; (3) prepare for the project including support and resources; (4) set a goal and ways to evaluate outcomes; (5) identify the root cause(s) of the problem and prioritise based on impact and effort to address; (6) develop a countermeasure that addresses the selected root cause effectively; (7) pilot a small-scale project to assess for possible modifications; (8) large-scale roll-out including education on how to implement the project; and (9) assess and modify the process with a feedback mechanism. Using this nine-step process, chlamydia screening rates increased from 29% to 60%. QI projects differ from most clinical research projects by allowing clinicians to directly improve patients’ health while contributing to the medical science body. This may interest clinicians wishing to conduct relevant research that can be disseminated through academic channels. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6910742 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69107422020-03-06 Continuous quality improvement methodology: a case study on multidisciplinary collaboration to improve chlamydia screening Ursu, Allison Greenberg, Grant McKee, Michael Fam Med Community Health Methodology This article illustrates quality improvement (QI) methodology using an example intended to improve chlamydia screening in women. QI projects in healthcare provide great opportunities to improve patient quality and safety in a real-world healthcare setting, yet many academic centres lack training programmes on how to conduct QI projects. The choice of chlamydia screening was based on the significant health burden chlamydia poses despite simple ways to screen and treat. At the University of Michigan, we implemented a multidepartment process to improve the chlamydia screening rates using the plan-do-check-act model. Steps to guide QI projects include the following: (1) assemble a motivated team of stakeholders and leaders; (2) identify the problem that is considered a high priority; (3) prepare for the project including support and resources; (4) set a goal and ways to evaluate outcomes; (5) identify the root cause(s) of the problem and prioritise based on impact and effort to address; (6) develop a countermeasure that addresses the selected root cause effectively; (7) pilot a small-scale project to assess for possible modifications; (8) large-scale roll-out including education on how to implement the project; and (9) assess and modify the process with a feedback mechanism. Using this nine-step process, chlamydia screening rates increased from 29% to 60%. QI projects differ from most clinical research projects by allowing clinicians to directly improve patients’ health while contributing to the medical science body. This may interest clinicians wishing to conduct relevant research that can be disseminated through academic channels. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC6910742/ /pubmed/32148708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000085 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
spellingShingle | Methodology Ursu, Allison Greenberg, Grant McKee, Michael Continuous quality improvement methodology: a case study on multidisciplinary collaboration to improve chlamydia screening |
title | Continuous quality improvement methodology: a case study on multidisciplinary collaboration to improve chlamydia screening |
title_full | Continuous quality improvement methodology: a case study on multidisciplinary collaboration to improve chlamydia screening |
title_fullStr | Continuous quality improvement methodology: a case study on multidisciplinary collaboration to improve chlamydia screening |
title_full_unstemmed | Continuous quality improvement methodology: a case study on multidisciplinary collaboration to improve chlamydia screening |
title_short | Continuous quality improvement methodology: a case study on multidisciplinary collaboration to improve chlamydia screening |
title_sort | continuous quality improvement methodology: a case study on multidisciplinary collaboration to improve chlamydia screening |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6910742/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32148708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/fmch-2018-000085 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ursuallison continuousqualityimprovementmethodologyacasestudyonmultidisciplinarycollaborationtoimprovechlamydiascreening AT greenberggrant continuousqualityimprovementmethodologyacasestudyonmultidisciplinarycollaborationtoimprovechlamydiascreening AT mckeemichael continuousqualityimprovementmethodologyacasestudyonmultidisciplinarycollaborationtoimprovechlamydiascreening |