Cargando…
Feasibility and acceptability of living systematic reviews: results from a mixed-methods evaluation
BACKGROUND: Living systematic reviews (LSRs) offer an approach to keeping high-quality evidence synthesis continually up to date, so the most recent, relevant and reliable evidence can be used to inform policy and practice, resulting in improved quality of care and patient health outcomes. However,...
Autores principales: | Millard, Tanya, Synnot, Anneliese, Elliott, Julian, Green, Sally, McDonald, Steve, Turner, Tari |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911272/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31837703 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-1248-5 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Towards a new model for producing evidence-based guidelines: a qualitative study of current approaches and opportunities for innovation among Australian guideline developers
por: McDonald, Steve, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Awareness, value and use of the Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: an impact evaluation
por: Millard, Tanya, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The Australian living guidelines for the clinical care of people with COVID-19: What worked, what didn’t and why, a mixed methods process evaluation
por: Turner, Tari, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Weekly updates of national living evidence-based guidelines: methods for the Australian living guidelines for care of people with COVID-19
por: Tendal, Britta, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Informing the development of an online self-management program for men living with HIV: a needs assessment
por: Millard, Tanya, et al.
Publicado: (2014)