Cargando…

Comparison of sciatic nerve block quality achieved using the anterior and posterior approaches: a randomised trial

BACKGROUND: The co-administration of sciatic and femoral nerve blocks can provide anaesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing lower extremity surgeries. Several approaches to achieve sciatic nerve block have been described, including anterior and posterior approaches. METHODS: In total, 58 stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yektaş, Abdulkadir, Balkan, Bedih
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0898-0
_version_ 1783479235623518208
author Yektaş, Abdulkadir
Balkan, Bedih
author_facet Yektaş, Abdulkadir
Balkan, Bedih
author_sort Yektaş, Abdulkadir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The co-administration of sciatic and femoral nerve blocks can provide anaesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing lower extremity surgeries. Several approaches to achieve sciatic nerve block have been described, including anterior and posterior approaches. METHODS: In total, 58 study patients were randomly assigned to receive either anterior (group A, n = 29) or posterior (group P, n = 29) sciatic nerve block. Thereafter, the following parameters were determined: sensory and motor block start and end times, time to first fentanyl requirement after blockade but before the start of the operation, time to first fentanyl requirement after the start of the operation, mean fentanyl dose administered after blockade but before the start of the operation, mean fentanyl dose after the start of the operation, time to first diclofenac sodium dose, and total dose of diclofenac sodium required. The trial was retrospectively registered on 11 July 2018. RESULTS: The time to initiation of sensory block was significantly shorter in group P than in group A (7.70 ± 2.05 min and 12.88 ± 4.87 min, respectively; p = 0.01). Group P also had a significantly shorter time to first fentanyl requirement after block but before the start of the operation (00.00 ± 00.00 min for group P and 4.05 ± 7.47 min for group A; p < 0.01), significantly higher mean fentanyl dose per patient after block but before the start of the operation (44.03 ± 23.78 μg for group P and 31.20 ± 27.79 μg for group A), significantly longer time to first fentanyl requirement after the start of the operation (16.24 ± 7.13 min for group P and 00.00 ± 00.00 min for group A; p = 0.01), and significantly lower mean fentanyl dose per patient after the start of the operation (11.51 ± 2.87 μg for group P and 147.75 ± 22.30 μg for group A). Patient satisfaction (p < 0.01), anaesthesia quality (p = 0.006), and surgical quality (p = 0.047) were significantly higher in group P. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior and posterior approaches can be used to achieve sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing surgery for malleolar fractures. However, better anaesthesia and pain control results can be obtained if analgesia is administered preoperatively in patients with a posterior approach block and after the start of the operation in patients with an anterior approach block.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6911281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69112812019-12-23 Comparison of sciatic nerve block quality achieved using the anterior and posterior approaches: a randomised trial Yektaş, Abdulkadir Balkan, Bedih BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: The co-administration of sciatic and femoral nerve blocks can provide anaesthesia and analgesia in patients undergoing lower extremity surgeries. Several approaches to achieve sciatic nerve block have been described, including anterior and posterior approaches. METHODS: In total, 58 study patients were randomly assigned to receive either anterior (group A, n = 29) or posterior (group P, n = 29) sciatic nerve block. Thereafter, the following parameters were determined: sensory and motor block start and end times, time to first fentanyl requirement after blockade but before the start of the operation, time to first fentanyl requirement after the start of the operation, mean fentanyl dose administered after blockade but before the start of the operation, mean fentanyl dose after the start of the operation, time to first diclofenac sodium dose, and total dose of diclofenac sodium required. The trial was retrospectively registered on 11 July 2018. RESULTS: The time to initiation of sensory block was significantly shorter in group P than in group A (7.70 ± 2.05 min and 12.88 ± 4.87 min, respectively; p = 0.01). Group P also had a significantly shorter time to first fentanyl requirement after block but before the start of the operation (00.00 ± 00.00 min for group P and 4.05 ± 7.47 min for group A; p < 0.01), significantly higher mean fentanyl dose per patient after block but before the start of the operation (44.03 ± 23.78 μg for group P and 31.20 ± 27.79 μg for group A), significantly longer time to first fentanyl requirement after the start of the operation (16.24 ± 7.13 min for group P and 00.00 ± 00.00 min for group A; p = 0.01), and significantly lower mean fentanyl dose per patient after the start of the operation (11.51 ± 2.87 μg for group P and 147.75 ± 22.30 μg for group A). Patient satisfaction (p < 0.01), anaesthesia quality (p = 0.006), and surgical quality (p = 0.047) were significantly higher in group P. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior and posterior approaches can be used to achieve sciatic nerve block in patients undergoing surgery for malleolar fractures. However, better anaesthesia and pain control results can be obtained if analgesia is administered preoperatively in patients with a posterior approach block and after the start of the operation in patients with an anterior approach block. BioMed Central 2019-12-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6911281/ /pubmed/31835994 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0898-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yektaş, Abdulkadir
Balkan, Bedih
Comparison of sciatic nerve block quality achieved using the anterior and posterior approaches: a randomised trial
title Comparison of sciatic nerve block quality achieved using the anterior and posterior approaches: a randomised trial
title_full Comparison of sciatic nerve block quality achieved using the anterior and posterior approaches: a randomised trial
title_fullStr Comparison of sciatic nerve block quality achieved using the anterior and posterior approaches: a randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of sciatic nerve block quality achieved using the anterior and posterior approaches: a randomised trial
title_short Comparison of sciatic nerve block quality achieved using the anterior and posterior approaches: a randomised trial
title_sort comparison of sciatic nerve block quality achieved using the anterior and posterior approaches: a randomised trial
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31835994
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0898-0
work_keys_str_mv AT yektasabdulkadir comparisonofsciaticnerveblockqualityachievedusingtheanteriorandposteriorapproachesarandomisedtrial
AT balkanbedih comparisonofsciaticnerveblockqualityachievedusingtheanteriorandposteriorapproachesarandomisedtrial