Cargando…

Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries

PURPOSE: Patient-centred and value-based health-care organisations are increasingly recognising the importance of the patient perspective in the measurement and evaluation of health outcomes. This has been primarily implemented using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Clinical quality regist...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruseckaite, Rasa, Maharaj, Ashika D, Krysinska, Karolina, Dean, Joanne, Ahern, Susannah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849553
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S229569
_version_ 1783479243187945472
author Ruseckaite, Rasa
Maharaj, Ashika D
Krysinska, Karolina
Dean, Joanne
Ahern, Susannah
author_facet Ruseckaite, Rasa
Maharaj, Ashika D
Krysinska, Karolina
Dean, Joanne
Ahern, Susannah
author_sort Ruseckaite, Rasa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Patient-centred and value-based health-care organisations are increasingly recognising the importance of the patient perspective in the measurement and evaluation of health outcomes. This has been primarily implemented using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are specifically designed to improve direct clinical care, benchmark health-care provision and inform health service planning and policy. Despite CQRs having incorporated the patient perspective to support the evaluation of health-care provision, no evidence-based guidelines for inclusion of PROMs in CQRs exist. This has led to substantial heterogeneity in capturing and reporting PROMs within this setting. This publication is the first in a series describing the development of evidence-informed guidelines for PROMs inclusion within CQRs in Australia. METHODS: This study consisted of three components: 1) a literature review of existing evidence of guidelines, enablers, barriers, and lessons learnt of PROMs use within the CQRs setting; 2) a survey of Australian CQRs to determine current practices for PROMs use and reporting; and 3) development of a preliminary conceptual framework for PROMs inclusion in CQRs. RESULTS: Content analysis of the literature review and survey of 66 Australian registries elicited eight categories for the conceptual framework. The framework covers eight components: rationale, setting, ethics, selection of PROMs, administration, data management, statistical methods, feedback, and reporting. CONCLUSION: We developed a preliminary conceptual framework, which classified findings, from both the literature and the survey, into broad categories ranging from initial development to outcome dissemination providing the structure for development of guidelines in the next phase of this project, engaging national and international leaders in health-related quality of life research, clinicians, researchers, patient advocates and consumers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6911317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69113172019-12-17 Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries Ruseckaite, Rasa Maharaj, Ashika D Krysinska, Karolina Dean, Joanne Ahern, Susannah Patient Relat Outcome Meas Original Research PURPOSE: Patient-centred and value-based health-care organisations are increasingly recognising the importance of the patient perspective in the measurement and evaluation of health outcomes. This has been primarily implemented using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Clinical quality registries (CQRs) are specifically designed to improve direct clinical care, benchmark health-care provision and inform health service planning and policy. Despite CQRs having incorporated the patient perspective to support the evaluation of health-care provision, no evidence-based guidelines for inclusion of PROMs in CQRs exist. This has led to substantial heterogeneity in capturing and reporting PROMs within this setting. This publication is the first in a series describing the development of evidence-informed guidelines for PROMs inclusion within CQRs in Australia. METHODS: This study consisted of three components: 1) a literature review of existing evidence of guidelines, enablers, barriers, and lessons learnt of PROMs use within the CQRs setting; 2) a survey of Australian CQRs to determine current practices for PROMs use and reporting; and 3) development of a preliminary conceptual framework for PROMs inclusion in CQRs. RESULTS: Content analysis of the literature review and survey of 66 Australian registries elicited eight categories for the conceptual framework. The framework covers eight components: rationale, setting, ethics, selection of PROMs, administration, data management, statistical methods, feedback, and reporting. CONCLUSION: We developed a preliminary conceptual framework, which classified findings, from both the literature and the survey, into broad categories ranging from initial development to outcome dissemination providing the structure for development of guidelines in the next phase of this project, engaging national and international leaders in health-related quality of life research, clinicians, researchers, patient advocates and consumers. Dove 2019-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC6911317/ /pubmed/31849553 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S229569 Text en © 2019 Ruseckaite et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ruseckaite, Rasa
Maharaj, Ashika D
Krysinska, Karolina
Dean, Joanne
Ahern, Susannah
Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries
title Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries
title_full Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries
title_fullStr Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries
title_full_unstemmed Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries
title_short Developing a Preliminary Conceptual Framework for Guidelines on Inclusion of Patient Reported-Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Clinical Quality Registries
title_sort developing a preliminary conceptual framework for guidelines on inclusion of patient reported-outcome measures (proms) in clinical quality registries
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849553
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S229569
work_keys_str_mv AT ruseckaiterasa developingapreliminaryconceptualframeworkforguidelinesoninclusionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinclinicalqualityregistries
AT maharajashikad developingapreliminaryconceptualframeworkforguidelinesoninclusionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinclinicalqualityregistries
AT krysinskakarolina developingapreliminaryconceptualframeworkforguidelinesoninclusionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinclinicalqualityregistries
AT deanjoanne developingapreliminaryconceptualframeworkforguidelinesoninclusionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinclinicalqualityregistries
AT ahernsusannah developingapreliminaryconceptualframeworkforguidelinesoninclusionofpatientreportedoutcomemeasurespromsinclinicalqualityregistries