Cargando…

Reserved Bed Program Reduces Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit Capacity Strain: An Implementation Study

BACKGROUND: Neurosciences intensive care units (NICUs) provide institutional centers for specialized care. Despite a demonstrable reduction in morbidity and mortality, NICUs may experience significant capacity strain with resulting supraoptimal utilization and diseconomies of scale. We present an im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shank, Christopher D, Erickson, Nicholas J, Miller, David W, Lindsey, Brittany F, Walters, Beverly C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30809678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz024
_version_ 1783479312962289664
author Shank, Christopher D
Erickson, Nicholas J
Miller, David W
Lindsey, Brittany F
Walters, Beverly C
author_facet Shank, Christopher D
Erickson, Nicholas J
Miller, David W
Lindsey, Brittany F
Walters, Beverly C
author_sort Shank, Christopher D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Neurosciences intensive care units (NICUs) provide institutional centers for specialized care. Despite a demonstrable reduction in morbidity and mortality, NICUs may experience significant capacity strain with resulting supraoptimal utilization and diseconomies of scale. We present an implementation study in the recognition and management of capacity strain within a large NICU in the United States. Excessive resource demand in an NICU creates significant operational issues. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a Reserved Bed Pilot Program (RBPP), implemented to maximize economies of scale, to reduce transfer declines due to lack of capacity, and to increase transfer volume for the neurosciences service-line. METHODS: Key performance indicators (KPIs) were created to evaluate RBPP efficacy with respect to primary (strategic) objectives. Operational KPIs were established to evaluate changes in operational throughput for the neurosciences and other service-lines. For each KPI, pilot-period data were compared to the previous fiscal year. RESULTS: RBPP implementation resulted in a significant increase in accepted transfer volume to the neurosciences service-line (P = .02). Transfer declines due to capacity decreased significantly (P = .01). Unit utilization significantly improved across service-line units relative to theoretical optima (P < .03). Care regionalization was achieved through a significant reduction in “off-service” patient placement (P = .01). Negative externalities were minimized, with no significant negative impact in the operational KPIs of other evaluated service-lines (P = .11). CONCLUSION: Capacity strain is a significant issue for hospital units. Reducing capacity strain can increase unit efficiency, improve resource utilization, and augment service-line throughput. RBPP implementation resulted in a significant improvement in service-line operations, regional access to care, and resource efficiency, with minimal externalities at the institutional level.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6911732
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69117322019-12-19 Reserved Bed Program Reduces Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit Capacity Strain: An Implementation Study Shank, Christopher D Erickson, Nicholas J Miller, David W Lindsey, Brittany F Walters, Beverly C Neurosurgery Research—Human—Clinical Studies BACKGROUND: Neurosciences intensive care units (NICUs) provide institutional centers for specialized care. Despite a demonstrable reduction in morbidity and mortality, NICUs may experience significant capacity strain with resulting supraoptimal utilization and diseconomies of scale. We present an implementation study in the recognition and management of capacity strain within a large NICU in the United States. Excessive resource demand in an NICU creates significant operational issues. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of a Reserved Bed Pilot Program (RBPP), implemented to maximize economies of scale, to reduce transfer declines due to lack of capacity, and to increase transfer volume for the neurosciences service-line. METHODS: Key performance indicators (KPIs) were created to evaluate RBPP efficacy with respect to primary (strategic) objectives. Operational KPIs were established to evaluate changes in operational throughput for the neurosciences and other service-lines. For each KPI, pilot-period data were compared to the previous fiscal year. RESULTS: RBPP implementation resulted in a significant increase in accepted transfer volume to the neurosciences service-line (P = .02). Transfer declines due to capacity decreased significantly (P = .01). Unit utilization significantly improved across service-line units relative to theoretical optima (P < .03). Care regionalization was achieved through a significant reduction in “off-service” patient placement (P = .01). Negative externalities were minimized, with no significant negative impact in the operational KPIs of other evaluated service-lines (P = .11). CONCLUSION: Capacity strain is a significant issue for hospital units. Reducing capacity strain can increase unit efficiency, improve resource utilization, and augment service-line throughput. RBPP implementation resulted in a significant improvement in service-line operations, regional access to care, and resource efficiency, with minimal externalities at the institutional level. Oxford University Press 2020-01 2019-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6911732/ /pubmed/30809678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz024 Text en © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2019. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Research—Human—Clinical Studies
Shank, Christopher D
Erickson, Nicholas J
Miller, David W
Lindsey, Brittany F
Walters, Beverly C
Reserved Bed Program Reduces Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit Capacity Strain: An Implementation Study
title Reserved Bed Program Reduces Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit Capacity Strain: An Implementation Study
title_full Reserved Bed Program Reduces Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit Capacity Strain: An Implementation Study
title_fullStr Reserved Bed Program Reduces Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit Capacity Strain: An Implementation Study
title_full_unstemmed Reserved Bed Program Reduces Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit Capacity Strain: An Implementation Study
title_short Reserved Bed Program Reduces Neurosciences Intensive Care Unit Capacity Strain: An Implementation Study
title_sort reserved bed program reduces neurosciences intensive care unit capacity strain: an implementation study
topic Research—Human—Clinical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911732/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30809678
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz024
work_keys_str_mv AT shankchristopherd reservedbedprogramreducesneurosciencesintensivecareunitcapacitystrainanimplementationstudy
AT ericksonnicholasj reservedbedprogramreducesneurosciencesintensivecareunitcapacitystrainanimplementationstudy
AT millerdavidw reservedbedprogramreducesneurosciencesintensivecareunitcapacitystrainanimplementationstudy
AT lindseybrittanyf reservedbedprogramreducesneurosciencesintensivecareunitcapacitystrainanimplementationstudy
AT waltersbeverlyc reservedbedprogramreducesneurosciencesintensivecareunitcapacitystrainanimplementationstudy