Cargando…

Effect of Sequential Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation and Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Corneal Ectasia

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical efficacy of sequential intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation and corneal crosslinking (CXL) in corneal ectasia. METHODS: This retrospective case series included eight eyes in which both ICRS implantation and CXL had been performed. CXL was performed wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Chung Young, Kim, Mee Kum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31833250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2019.0088
_version_ 1783479324492431360
author Kim, Chung Young
Kim, Mee Kum
author_facet Kim, Chung Young
Kim, Mee Kum
author_sort Kim, Chung Young
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess the clinical efficacy of sequential intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation and corneal crosslinking (CXL) in corneal ectasia. METHODS: This retrospective case series included eight eyes in which both ICRS implantation and CXL had been performed. CXL was performed within 1 month after ICRS implantation. The clinical outcomes (visual acuity, refractive errors, keratometry, and topographic indices) of these patients were compared with those of patients who had undergone only ICRS implantation (eight eyes) or CXL (20 eyes). RESULTS: Greater improvement in uncorrected visual acuity was observed in the ICRS + CXL group than in the ICRS or CXL alone groups at both 6 (p = 0.008) and 12 months (p = 0.028). Refractive errors of sphere and spherical equivalent were significantly reduced in both the ICRS (p = 0.002 at 6 months, p = 0.004 at 12 months) and ICRS + CXL groups (p < 0.001 at both 6 and 12 months). Keratometric values including the maximum, minimum, and average were significantly reduced in all 3 groups at postoperative 6 and 12 months; however, the greatest reductions were observed in the ICRS + CXL group (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ICRS implantation followed by CXL within 1 month seems to be effective, and may be superior to ICRS or CXL alone in improving visual acuity and reducing refractive errors and keratometric values.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6911792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69117922019-12-29 Effect of Sequential Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation and Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Corneal Ectasia Kim, Chung Young Kim, Mee Kum Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To assess the clinical efficacy of sequential intrastromal corneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation and corneal crosslinking (CXL) in corneal ectasia. METHODS: This retrospective case series included eight eyes in which both ICRS implantation and CXL had been performed. CXL was performed within 1 month after ICRS implantation. The clinical outcomes (visual acuity, refractive errors, keratometry, and topographic indices) of these patients were compared with those of patients who had undergone only ICRS implantation (eight eyes) or CXL (20 eyes). RESULTS: Greater improvement in uncorrected visual acuity was observed in the ICRS + CXL group than in the ICRS or CXL alone groups at both 6 (p = 0.008) and 12 months (p = 0.028). Refractive errors of sphere and spherical equivalent were significantly reduced in both the ICRS (p = 0.002 at 6 months, p = 0.004 at 12 months) and ICRS + CXL groups (p < 0.001 at both 6 and 12 months). Keratometric values including the maximum, minimum, and average were significantly reduced in all 3 groups at postoperative 6 and 12 months; however, the greatest reductions were observed in the ICRS + CXL group (all p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ICRS implantation followed by CXL within 1 month seems to be effective, and may be superior to ICRS or CXL alone in improving visual acuity and reducing refractive errors and keratometric values. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2019-12 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6911792/ /pubmed/31833250 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2019.0088 Text en © 2019 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Chung Young
Kim, Mee Kum
Effect of Sequential Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation and Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Corneal Ectasia
title Effect of Sequential Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation and Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Corneal Ectasia
title_full Effect of Sequential Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation and Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Corneal Ectasia
title_fullStr Effect of Sequential Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation and Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Corneal Ectasia
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Sequential Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation and Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Corneal Ectasia
title_short Effect of Sequential Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segment Implantation and Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Corneal Ectasia
title_sort effect of sequential intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation and corneal collagen crosslinking in corneal ectasia
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31833250
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2019.0088
work_keys_str_mv AT kimchungyoung effectofsequentialintrastromalcornealringsegmentimplantationandcornealcollagencrosslinkingincornealectasia
AT kimmeekum effectofsequentialintrastromalcornealringsegmentimplantationandcornealcollagencrosslinkingincornealectasia