Cargando…

Comparison of Focal and Conventional Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of focal verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients diagnosed with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). METHODS: This study enrolled 52 eyes of 52 patients with chronic CSC who had received verteporfin PDT. The laser spot size of 26 eyes covering...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Noh, Sung Rae, Kang, Min Seok, Kim, Kiyoung, Kim, Eung Suk, Yu, Seung-Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31833247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2019.0065
_version_ 1783479324727312384
author Noh, Sung Rae
Kang, Min Seok
Kim, Kiyoung
Kim, Eung Suk
Yu, Seung-Young
author_facet Noh, Sung Rae
Kang, Min Seok
Kim, Kiyoung
Kim, Eung Suk
Yu, Seung-Young
author_sort Noh, Sung Rae
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of focal verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients diagnosed with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). METHODS: This study enrolled 52 eyes of 52 patients with chronic CSC who had received verteporfin PDT. The laser spot size of 26 eyes covering only the localized hyperfluorescent area in indocyanine green angiography was classified as focal PDT. The PDT spot size of the other 26 eyes covered the total area of retinal pigment epithelial detachment including the leaking point and was defined as conventional PDT. The central subfield thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness were measured using Heidelberg Spectralis optical coherence tomography before PDT and at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 after PDT. RESULTS: The mean spot size of the PDT was 1,995 µm in the focal group and 2,995 µm in the conventional group. Central subfield thickness steadily decreased in both groups. The mean baseline subfoveal choroidal thickness for the two groups was 334.95 and 348.35 µm, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.602). Subfoveal choroidal thickness decreased significantly to 304.20 µm at 1 month, 284.85 µm at 3 months, 271.60 µm at 6 months, and 265.95 µm at 12 months in the focal group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively, compared with baseline). In the conventional group, subfoveal choroidal thickness decreased significantly to 318.75, 300, 284, and 272 µm at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 compared with baseline). There were no significant differences between the two groups in subfoveal choroidal thickness based on PDT spot size at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (p = 0.633, p = 0.625, p = 0.676, and p =0.755, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Focal verteporfin PDT for CSC significantly decreased the subretinal fluid and sufoveal choroidal thickness to the same extent as conventional PDT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6911793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Korean Ophthalmological Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69117932019-12-29 Comparison of Focal and Conventional Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Noh, Sung Rae Kang, Min Seok Kim, Kiyoung Kim, Eung Suk Yu, Seung-Young Korean J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of focal verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) in patients diagnosed with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC). METHODS: This study enrolled 52 eyes of 52 patients with chronic CSC who had received verteporfin PDT. The laser spot size of 26 eyes covering only the localized hyperfluorescent area in indocyanine green angiography was classified as focal PDT. The PDT spot size of the other 26 eyes covered the total area of retinal pigment epithelial detachment including the leaking point and was defined as conventional PDT. The central subfield thickness and subfoveal choroidal thickness were measured using Heidelberg Spectralis optical coherence tomography before PDT and at months 1, 3, 6, and 12 after PDT. RESULTS: The mean spot size of the PDT was 1,995 µm in the focal group and 2,995 µm in the conventional group. Central subfield thickness steadily decreased in both groups. The mean baseline subfoveal choroidal thickness for the two groups was 334.95 and 348.35 µm, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.602). Subfoveal choroidal thickness decreased significantly to 304.20 µm at 1 month, 284.85 µm at 3 months, 271.60 µm at 6 months, and 265.95 µm at 12 months in the focal group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively, compared with baseline). In the conventional group, subfoveal choroidal thickness decreased significantly to 318.75, 300, 284, and 272 µm at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 compared with baseline). There were no significant differences between the two groups in subfoveal choroidal thickness based on PDT spot size at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months (p = 0.633, p = 0.625, p = 0.676, and p =0.755, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Focal verteporfin PDT for CSC significantly decreased the subretinal fluid and sufoveal choroidal thickness to the same extent as conventional PDT. The Korean Ophthalmological Society 2019-12 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6911793/ /pubmed/31833247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2019.0065 Text en © 2019 The Korean Ophthalmological Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Noh, Sung Rae
Kang, Min Seok
Kim, Kiyoung
Kim, Eung Suk
Yu, Seung-Young
Comparison of Focal and Conventional Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
title Comparison of Focal and Conventional Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
title_full Comparison of Focal and Conventional Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
title_fullStr Comparison of Focal and Conventional Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Focal and Conventional Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
title_short Comparison of Focal and Conventional Verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy for Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy
title_sort comparison of focal and conventional verteporfin photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31833247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2019.0065
work_keys_str_mv AT nohsungrae comparisonoffocalandconventionalverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforchroniccentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT kangminseok comparisonoffocalandconventionalverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforchroniccentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT kimkiyoung comparisonoffocalandconventionalverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforchroniccentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT kimeungsuk comparisonoffocalandconventionalverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforchroniccentralserouschorioretinopathy
AT yuseungyoung comparisonoffocalandconventionalverteporfinphotodynamictherapyforchroniccentralserouschorioretinopathy