Cargando…
Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome?
Blunt cerebrovascular injuries are rare, comprises of 0.08 to 0.33% of all traumatic blunt injuries. Depending on the grade of severity, they may heal with minimal consequences or may lead to debilitating and devastating stroke. Surgically accessible lesions are infrequent and hence endovascular man...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31872027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100263 |
_version_ | 1783479350868312064 |
---|---|
author | Rattan, Amulya Kataria, Ruby Kumar, Ajay Azam, Quamar |
author_facet | Rattan, Amulya Kataria, Ruby Kumar, Ajay Azam, Quamar |
author_sort | Rattan, Amulya |
collection | PubMed |
description | Blunt cerebrovascular injuries are rare, comprises of 0.08 to 0.33% of all traumatic blunt injuries. Depending on the grade of severity, they may heal with minimal consequences or may lead to debilitating and devastating stroke. Surgically accessible lesions are infrequent and hence endovascular management is preferred modality for high-grade lesions. We hereby present a case of complete thrombosis of the common carotid artery, which couldn't receive either surgical or endovascular treatment due to low resource settings. The patient developed a stroke after 18 h of trauma, which, however, recovered completely and dramatically within 96 h. To the best of our knowledge, such rapid and complete recovery from stroke secondary to blunt carotid injury managed non-operatively hasn't been reported in literature so far. Our report adds to the scarce but growing body of evidence recommending conservative management in BCVI in absence of enlarging pseudoaneurysm and dissection with near-complete stenosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6911937 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69119372019-12-23 Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome? Rattan, Amulya Kataria, Ruby Kumar, Ajay Azam, Quamar Trauma Case Rep Case Report Blunt cerebrovascular injuries are rare, comprises of 0.08 to 0.33% of all traumatic blunt injuries. Depending on the grade of severity, they may heal with minimal consequences or may lead to debilitating and devastating stroke. Surgically accessible lesions are infrequent and hence endovascular management is preferred modality for high-grade lesions. We hereby present a case of complete thrombosis of the common carotid artery, which couldn't receive either surgical or endovascular treatment due to low resource settings. The patient developed a stroke after 18 h of trauma, which, however, recovered completely and dramatically within 96 h. To the best of our knowledge, such rapid and complete recovery from stroke secondary to blunt carotid injury managed non-operatively hasn't been reported in literature so far. Our report adds to the scarce but growing body of evidence recommending conservative management in BCVI in absence of enlarging pseudoaneurysm and dissection with near-complete stenosis. Elsevier 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6911937/ /pubmed/31872027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100263 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Case Report Rattan, Amulya Kataria, Ruby Kumar, Ajay Azam, Quamar Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome? |
title | Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome? |
title_full | Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome? |
title_fullStr | Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome? |
title_full_unstemmed | Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome? |
title_short | Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome? |
title_sort | blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: is an intervention always required for best outcome? |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911937/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31872027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100263 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rattanamulya bluntcarotidinjurywiththromboticocclusionisaninterventionalwaysrequiredforbestoutcome AT katariaruby bluntcarotidinjurywiththromboticocclusionisaninterventionalwaysrequiredforbestoutcome AT kumarajay bluntcarotidinjurywiththromboticocclusionisaninterventionalwaysrequiredforbestoutcome AT azamquamar bluntcarotidinjurywiththromboticocclusionisaninterventionalwaysrequiredforbestoutcome |