Cargando…

Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome?

Blunt cerebrovascular injuries are rare, comprises of 0.08 to 0.33% of all traumatic blunt injuries. Depending on the grade of severity, they may heal with minimal consequences or may lead to debilitating and devastating stroke. Surgically accessible lesions are infrequent and hence endovascular man...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rattan, Amulya, Kataria, Ruby, Kumar, Ajay, Azam, Quamar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31872027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100263
_version_ 1783479350868312064
author Rattan, Amulya
Kataria, Ruby
Kumar, Ajay
Azam, Quamar
author_facet Rattan, Amulya
Kataria, Ruby
Kumar, Ajay
Azam, Quamar
author_sort Rattan, Amulya
collection PubMed
description Blunt cerebrovascular injuries are rare, comprises of 0.08 to 0.33% of all traumatic blunt injuries. Depending on the grade of severity, they may heal with minimal consequences or may lead to debilitating and devastating stroke. Surgically accessible lesions are infrequent and hence endovascular management is preferred modality for high-grade lesions. We hereby present a case of complete thrombosis of the common carotid artery, which couldn't receive either surgical or endovascular treatment due to low resource settings. The patient developed a stroke after 18 h of trauma, which, however, recovered completely and dramatically within 96 h. To the best of our knowledge, such rapid and complete recovery from stroke secondary to blunt carotid injury managed non-operatively hasn't been reported in literature so far. Our report adds to the scarce but growing body of evidence recommending conservative management in BCVI in absence of enlarging pseudoaneurysm and dissection with near-complete stenosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6911937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69119372019-12-23 Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome? Rattan, Amulya Kataria, Ruby Kumar, Ajay Azam, Quamar Trauma Case Rep Case Report Blunt cerebrovascular injuries are rare, comprises of 0.08 to 0.33% of all traumatic blunt injuries. Depending on the grade of severity, they may heal with minimal consequences or may lead to debilitating and devastating stroke. Surgically accessible lesions are infrequent and hence endovascular management is preferred modality for high-grade lesions. We hereby present a case of complete thrombosis of the common carotid artery, which couldn't receive either surgical or endovascular treatment due to low resource settings. The patient developed a stroke after 18 h of trauma, which, however, recovered completely and dramatically within 96 h. To the best of our knowledge, such rapid and complete recovery from stroke secondary to blunt carotid injury managed non-operatively hasn't been reported in literature so far. Our report adds to the scarce but growing body of evidence recommending conservative management in BCVI in absence of enlarging pseudoaneurysm and dissection with near-complete stenosis. Elsevier 2019-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6911937/ /pubmed/31872027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100263 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Report
Rattan, Amulya
Kataria, Ruby
Kumar, Ajay
Azam, Quamar
Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome?
title Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome?
title_full Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome?
title_fullStr Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome?
title_full_unstemmed Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome?
title_short Blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: Is an intervention always required for best outcome?
title_sort blunt carotid injury with thrombotic occlusion: is an intervention always required for best outcome?
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31872027
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tcr.2019.100263
work_keys_str_mv AT rattanamulya bluntcarotidinjurywiththromboticocclusionisaninterventionalwaysrequiredforbestoutcome
AT katariaruby bluntcarotidinjurywiththromboticocclusionisaninterventionalwaysrequiredforbestoutcome
AT kumarajay bluntcarotidinjurywiththromboticocclusionisaninterventionalwaysrequiredforbestoutcome
AT azamquamar bluntcarotidinjurywiththromboticocclusionisaninterventionalwaysrequiredforbestoutcome