Cargando…

Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia

BACKGROUND: Severe jejunoileal atresia is associated with prolonged parenteral nutrition, higher mortality and secondary surgery. However, the ideal surgical management of this condition remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with severe jejunoileal atresia treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Yan-Fen, Zheng, Hai-Qing, Zhang, Hong, He, Qiu-Ming, Wang, Zhe, Zhong, Wei, Yu, Jia-Kang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31857906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goz026
_version_ 1783479363149234176
author Peng, Yan-Fen
Zheng, Hai-Qing
Zhang, Hong
He, Qiu-Ming
Wang, Zhe
Zhong, Wei
Yu, Jia-Kang
author_facet Peng, Yan-Fen
Zheng, Hai-Qing
Zhang, Hong
He, Qiu-Ming
Wang, Zhe
Zhong, Wei
Yu, Jia-Kang
author_sort Peng, Yan-Fen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Severe jejunoileal atresia is associated with prolonged parenteral nutrition, higher mortality and secondary surgery. However, the ideal surgical management of this condition remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with severe jejunoileal atresia treated by three different procedures. METHODS: From January 2007 to December 2016, 105 neonates with severe jejunoileal atresia were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 42 patients (40.0%) underwent the Bishop–Koop procedure (BK group), 49 (46.7%) underwent primary anastomosis (PA group) and 14 (13.3%) underwent Mikulicz double-barreled ileostomy (DB group). Demographics, treatment and outcomes including mortality, morbidity and nutrition status were reviewed and were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The total mortality rate was 6.7%, showing no statistical difference among the three groups (P = 0.164). The BK group had the lowest post-operative complication rate (33.3% vs 65.3% for the PA group and 71.4% for the DB group, P = 0.003) and re-operation rate (4.8% vs 38.8% for the PA group and 14.3% for the DB group, P < 0.001). Compared with the BK group, the PA group showed a positive correlation with the complication rate and re-operation rate, with an odds ratio of 4.15 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57, 10.96] and 12.78 (95% CI: 2.58, 63.29), respectively. The DB group showed a positive correlation with the complication rate when compared with the BK group, with an odds ratio of 7.73 (95% CI: 1.67, 35.72). The weight-for-age Z-score at stoma closure was –1.22 (95% CI: –1.91, –0.54) in the BK group and –2.84 (95% CI: –4.28, –1.40) in the DB group (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The Bishop–Koop procedure for severe jejunoileal atresia had a low complication rate and re-operation rate, and the nutrition status at stoma closure was superior to double-barreled enterostomy. The Bishop–Koop procedure seems to be an appropriate choice for severe jejunoileal atresia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6911992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69119922019-12-19 Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia Peng, Yan-Fen Zheng, Hai-Qing Zhang, Hong He, Qiu-Ming Wang, Zhe Zhong, Wei Yu, Jia-Kang Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) Original Articles BACKGROUND: Severe jejunoileal atresia is associated with prolonged parenteral nutrition, higher mortality and secondary surgery. However, the ideal surgical management of this condition remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with severe jejunoileal atresia treated by three different procedures. METHODS: From January 2007 to December 2016, 105 neonates with severe jejunoileal atresia were retrospectively reviewed. Of these, 42 patients (40.0%) underwent the Bishop–Koop procedure (BK group), 49 (46.7%) underwent primary anastomosis (PA group) and 14 (13.3%) underwent Mikulicz double-barreled ileostomy (DB group). Demographics, treatment and outcomes including mortality, morbidity and nutrition status were reviewed and were compared among the three groups. RESULTS: The total mortality rate was 6.7%, showing no statistical difference among the three groups (P = 0.164). The BK group had the lowest post-operative complication rate (33.3% vs 65.3% for the PA group and 71.4% for the DB group, P = 0.003) and re-operation rate (4.8% vs 38.8% for the PA group and 14.3% for the DB group, P < 0.001). Compared with the BK group, the PA group showed a positive correlation with the complication rate and re-operation rate, with an odds ratio of 4.15 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.57, 10.96] and 12.78 (95% CI: 2.58, 63.29), respectively. The DB group showed a positive correlation with the complication rate when compared with the BK group, with an odds ratio of 7.73 (95% CI: 1.67, 35.72). The weight-for-age Z-score at stoma closure was –1.22 (95% CI: –1.91, –0.54) in the BK group and –2.84 (95% CI: –4.28, –1.40) in the DB group (P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The Bishop–Koop procedure for severe jejunoileal atresia had a low complication rate and re-operation rate, and the nutrition status at stoma closure was superior to double-barreled enterostomy. The Bishop–Koop procedure seems to be an appropriate choice for severe jejunoileal atresia. Oxford University Press 2019-07-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6911992/ /pubmed/31857906 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goz026 Text en © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press and Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Peng, Yan-Fen
Zheng, Hai-Qing
Zhang, Hong
He, Qiu-Ming
Wang, Zhe
Zhong, Wei
Yu, Jia-Kang
Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia
title Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia
title_full Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia
title_fullStr Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia
title_short Comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia
title_sort comparison of outcomes following three surgical techniques for patients with severe jejunoileal atresia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6911992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31857906
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goz026
work_keys_str_mv AT pengyanfen comparisonofoutcomesfollowingthreesurgicaltechniquesforpatientswithseverejejunoilealatresia
AT zhenghaiqing comparisonofoutcomesfollowingthreesurgicaltechniquesforpatientswithseverejejunoilealatresia
AT zhanghong comparisonofoutcomesfollowingthreesurgicaltechniquesforpatientswithseverejejunoilealatresia
AT heqiuming comparisonofoutcomesfollowingthreesurgicaltechniquesforpatientswithseverejejunoilealatresia
AT wangzhe comparisonofoutcomesfollowingthreesurgicaltechniquesforpatientswithseverejejunoilealatresia
AT zhongwei comparisonofoutcomesfollowingthreesurgicaltechniquesforpatientswithseverejejunoilealatresia
AT yujiakang comparisonofoutcomesfollowingthreesurgicaltechniquesforpatientswithseverejejunoilealatresia