Cargando…

Polymyxin B hemoperfusion as a feasible therapy after source control in abdominal septic shock

BACKGROUND: Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) has been used as a treatment for intra-abdominal septic shock by absorbing and removing endotoxins of gram-negative bacilli. AIM: To investigate the clinical efficacy of PMX-HP in patients with gram-negative septic shock who underwent abdominal surgery....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jin Joo, Park, Young Jun, Moon, Ki Yoon, Park, Jin Hyeong, Jeong, Yong Ki, Kim, Eun Young
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31879534
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v11.i12.422
_version_ 1783479380250460160
author Kim, Jin Joo
Park, Young Jun
Moon, Ki Yoon
Park, Jin Hyeong
Jeong, Yong Ki
Kim, Eun Young
author_facet Kim, Jin Joo
Park, Young Jun
Moon, Ki Yoon
Park, Jin Hyeong
Jeong, Yong Ki
Kim, Eun Young
author_sort Kim, Jin Joo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) has been used as a treatment for intra-abdominal septic shock by absorbing and removing endotoxins of gram-negative bacilli. AIM: To investigate the clinical efficacy of PMX-HP in patients with gram-negative septic shock who underwent abdominal surgery. METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2018, patients who had septic shock secondary to peritonitis were enrolled. They were classified into PMX-HP treated and control groups based on postopreative intervention using PMX-HP. The clinical outcomes were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching methods to balance the overall distribution between the two groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 40 patients were analyzed (20 patients in the PMX group and 20 patients in the control group). The scores of total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, renal SOFA and coagulation SOFA were significantly improved in the PMX group but not in the control group. (from 11.2 ± 5.8 to 4.7 ± 3.5 in PMX group vs 10.0 ± 4.0 to 8.7 ± 7.3 in control group, P = 0.047 from 2.6 ± 1.0 to 0.7 ± 1.0 in PMX group vs 2.6 ± 1.5 to 2.8 ± 1.6 in control group, P = 0.000, from 1.6 ± 1.5 to 1.3 ± 1.3 in PMX group vs 1.2 ± 1.2 to 2.8 ± 1.8 in control group, P = 0.014, respectively). Further, the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay was significantly shorter in PMX group. However, no statistically significant difference was found in ICU mortality (50% in PMX group vs 50% in control group). CONCLUSION: PMX-HP is a feasible adjunct treatment for peritonitis in ICU patients with peritonitis for improved organ impairment and to stabilize hemodynamics. It would be helpful to enhance clinical outcomes especially in patients with complete elimination of the source of gram-negative bacilli infection by surgical procedure accompanied with conventional treatment of sepsis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6912072
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69120722019-12-27 Polymyxin B hemoperfusion as a feasible therapy after source control in abdominal septic shock Kim, Jin Joo Park, Young Jun Moon, Ki Yoon Park, Jin Hyeong Jeong, Yong Ki Kim, Eun Young World J Gastrointest Surg Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) has been used as a treatment for intra-abdominal septic shock by absorbing and removing endotoxins of gram-negative bacilli. AIM: To investigate the clinical efficacy of PMX-HP in patients with gram-negative septic shock who underwent abdominal surgery. METHODS: From January 2012 to December 2018, patients who had septic shock secondary to peritonitis were enrolled. They were classified into PMX-HP treated and control groups based on postopreative intervention using PMX-HP. The clinical outcomes were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching methods to balance the overall distribution between the two groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 40 patients were analyzed (20 patients in the PMX group and 20 patients in the control group). The scores of total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, renal SOFA and coagulation SOFA were significantly improved in the PMX group but not in the control group. (from 11.2 ± 5.8 to 4.7 ± 3.5 in PMX group vs 10.0 ± 4.0 to 8.7 ± 7.3 in control group, P = 0.047 from 2.6 ± 1.0 to 0.7 ± 1.0 in PMX group vs 2.6 ± 1.5 to 2.8 ± 1.6 in control group, P = 0.000, from 1.6 ± 1.5 to 1.3 ± 1.3 in PMX group vs 1.2 ± 1.2 to 2.8 ± 1.8 in control group, P = 0.014, respectively). Further, the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay was significantly shorter in PMX group. However, no statistically significant difference was found in ICU mortality (50% in PMX group vs 50% in control group). CONCLUSION: PMX-HP is a feasible adjunct treatment for peritonitis in ICU patients with peritonitis for improved organ impairment and to stabilize hemodynamics. It would be helpful to enhance clinical outcomes especially in patients with complete elimination of the source of gram-negative bacilli infection by surgical procedure accompanied with conventional treatment of sepsis. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2019-12-27 2019-12-27 /pmc/articles/PMC6912072/ /pubmed/31879534 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v11.i12.422 Text en ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Kim, Jin Joo
Park, Young Jun
Moon, Ki Yoon
Park, Jin Hyeong
Jeong, Yong Ki
Kim, Eun Young
Polymyxin B hemoperfusion as a feasible therapy after source control in abdominal septic shock
title Polymyxin B hemoperfusion as a feasible therapy after source control in abdominal septic shock
title_full Polymyxin B hemoperfusion as a feasible therapy after source control in abdominal septic shock
title_fullStr Polymyxin B hemoperfusion as a feasible therapy after source control in abdominal septic shock
title_full_unstemmed Polymyxin B hemoperfusion as a feasible therapy after source control in abdominal septic shock
title_short Polymyxin B hemoperfusion as a feasible therapy after source control in abdominal septic shock
title_sort polymyxin b hemoperfusion as a feasible therapy after source control in abdominal septic shock
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912072/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31879534
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v11.i12.422
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjinjoo polymyxinbhemoperfusionasafeasibletherapyaftersourcecontrolinabdominalsepticshock
AT parkyoungjun polymyxinbhemoperfusionasafeasibletherapyaftersourcecontrolinabdominalsepticshock
AT moonkiyoon polymyxinbhemoperfusionasafeasibletherapyaftersourcecontrolinabdominalsepticshock
AT parkjinhyeong polymyxinbhemoperfusionasafeasibletherapyaftersourcecontrolinabdominalsepticshock
AT jeongyongki polymyxinbhemoperfusionasafeasibletherapyaftersourcecontrolinabdominalsepticshock
AT kimeunyoung polymyxinbhemoperfusionasafeasibletherapyaftersourcecontrolinabdominalsepticshock