Cargando…

Prophylactic and Therapeutic Efficacy of Prebiotic Supplementation against Intestinal Coccidiosis in Rabbits

SIMPLE SUMMARY: There are limitations for using chemical products in meat production. The use of prebiotics to control Eimeria infections in rabbits may be of value. Prebiotics as a prophylaxis resulted in diminishing adverse effects caused by Eimeria spp. through decreasing fecal oocyst counts, ret...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El-Ashram, Saeed A., Aboelhadid, Shawky M., Abdel-Kafy, El-Sayed M., Hashem, Shymaa A., Mahrous, Lilian N., Farghly, Eman M., Moawad, Usama K., Kamel, Asmaa A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766204
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9110965
_version_ 1783479421828595712
author El-Ashram, Saeed A.
Aboelhadid, Shawky M.
Abdel-Kafy, El-Sayed M.
Hashem, Shymaa A.
Mahrous, Lilian N.
Farghly, Eman M.
Moawad, Usama K.
Kamel, Asmaa A.
author_facet El-Ashram, Saeed A.
Aboelhadid, Shawky M.
Abdel-Kafy, El-Sayed M.
Hashem, Shymaa A.
Mahrous, Lilian N.
Farghly, Eman M.
Moawad, Usama K.
Kamel, Asmaa A.
author_sort El-Ashram, Saeed A.
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: There are limitations for using chemical products in meat production. The use of prebiotics to control Eimeria infections in rabbits may be of value. Prebiotics as a prophylaxis resulted in diminishing adverse effects caused by Eimeria spp. through decreasing fecal oocyst counts, retaining body weight, and reducing the number of parasitic stages in the intestinal tissues when compared with the non-supplemented controls. ABSTRACT: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of prebiotic supplementation against intestinal coccidiosis in rabbits. Fifty male rabbits aged 35–60 days (1–1.5 kg) were divided into prophylactic and therapeutic experiments (five groups, 10 rabbits per group). Prophylactic experiment had prebiotic supplemented (PS-P), non-supplemented infected control (NI-P), and non-supplemented non-infected control (NN-P) groups. Ten days post-prebiotic supplementation (PPS), rabbits in groups PS-P and NI-P were infected orally with 5.0 × 10(4) sporulated oocysts of mixed Eimeria species. However, therapeutic experiment had prebiotic supplemented (PS-T) and untreated infected (UI-T) groups of naturally infected rabbits with Eimeria species. A significant reduction in oocyst count per gram feces (OPG) (p ≤ 0.05) was reported in the PS-P (57.33 × 10(3) ± 2.84) and NI-P (130.83 × 10(3) ± 43.38) groups during the experiment. Additionally, rabbits in groups (PS-P, 970.33 ± 31.79 g and NI-P, 870.66 ± 6.66 g) showed weight loss after infection. However, a significant (p ≤ 0.05) decrease in OPG was observed at day seven PPS in the PS-T group (4 × 10(3) ± 0.00) when compared with the UI-T group (32 × 10(3) ± 7.54). Furthermore, the PS-T group had a higher body weight than rabbits in the UI-T group. Histopathological findings of the intestinal tissues (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) showed that the counts of the endogenous stages were significantly higher in the NI-P and UI-T groups than in the prebiotic-supplemented groups (PS-P and PS-T). Supplementation of the prebiotic did not have any adverse effects on biochemical parameters, such as AST, ALT, creatinine, total protein, and total cholesterol. In conclusion, prebiotic supplementation can be used to minimize the adverse effects of intestinal coccidiosis in rabbits, which in turn limits body weight loss, especially for the prophylaxis of coccidial infection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6912293
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69122932020-01-02 Prophylactic and Therapeutic Efficacy of Prebiotic Supplementation against Intestinal Coccidiosis in Rabbits El-Ashram, Saeed A. Aboelhadid, Shawky M. Abdel-Kafy, El-Sayed M. Hashem, Shymaa A. Mahrous, Lilian N. Farghly, Eman M. Moawad, Usama K. Kamel, Asmaa A. Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: There are limitations for using chemical products in meat production. The use of prebiotics to control Eimeria infections in rabbits may be of value. Prebiotics as a prophylaxis resulted in diminishing adverse effects caused by Eimeria spp. through decreasing fecal oocyst counts, retaining body weight, and reducing the number of parasitic stages in the intestinal tissues when compared with the non-supplemented controls. ABSTRACT: This study was conducted to investigate the effect of prebiotic supplementation against intestinal coccidiosis in rabbits. Fifty male rabbits aged 35–60 days (1–1.5 kg) were divided into prophylactic and therapeutic experiments (five groups, 10 rabbits per group). Prophylactic experiment had prebiotic supplemented (PS-P), non-supplemented infected control (NI-P), and non-supplemented non-infected control (NN-P) groups. Ten days post-prebiotic supplementation (PPS), rabbits in groups PS-P and NI-P were infected orally with 5.0 × 10(4) sporulated oocysts of mixed Eimeria species. However, therapeutic experiment had prebiotic supplemented (PS-T) and untreated infected (UI-T) groups of naturally infected rabbits with Eimeria species. A significant reduction in oocyst count per gram feces (OPG) (p ≤ 0.05) was reported in the PS-P (57.33 × 10(3) ± 2.84) and NI-P (130.83 × 10(3) ± 43.38) groups during the experiment. Additionally, rabbits in groups (PS-P, 970.33 ± 31.79 g and NI-P, 870.66 ± 6.66 g) showed weight loss after infection. However, a significant (p ≤ 0.05) decrease in OPG was observed at day seven PPS in the PS-T group (4 × 10(3) ± 0.00) when compared with the UI-T group (32 × 10(3) ± 7.54). Furthermore, the PS-T group had a higher body weight than rabbits in the UI-T group. Histopathological findings of the intestinal tissues (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) showed that the counts of the endogenous stages were significantly higher in the NI-P and UI-T groups than in the prebiotic-supplemented groups (PS-P and PS-T). Supplementation of the prebiotic did not have any adverse effects on biochemical parameters, such as AST, ALT, creatinine, total protein, and total cholesterol. In conclusion, prebiotic supplementation can be used to minimize the adverse effects of intestinal coccidiosis in rabbits, which in turn limits body weight loss, especially for the prophylaxis of coccidial infection. MDPI 2019-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6912293/ /pubmed/31766204 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9110965 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
El-Ashram, Saeed A.
Aboelhadid, Shawky M.
Abdel-Kafy, El-Sayed M.
Hashem, Shymaa A.
Mahrous, Lilian N.
Farghly, Eman M.
Moawad, Usama K.
Kamel, Asmaa A.
Prophylactic and Therapeutic Efficacy of Prebiotic Supplementation against Intestinal Coccidiosis in Rabbits
title Prophylactic and Therapeutic Efficacy of Prebiotic Supplementation against Intestinal Coccidiosis in Rabbits
title_full Prophylactic and Therapeutic Efficacy of Prebiotic Supplementation against Intestinal Coccidiosis in Rabbits
title_fullStr Prophylactic and Therapeutic Efficacy of Prebiotic Supplementation against Intestinal Coccidiosis in Rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Prophylactic and Therapeutic Efficacy of Prebiotic Supplementation against Intestinal Coccidiosis in Rabbits
title_short Prophylactic and Therapeutic Efficacy of Prebiotic Supplementation against Intestinal Coccidiosis in Rabbits
title_sort prophylactic and therapeutic efficacy of prebiotic supplementation against intestinal coccidiosis in rabbits
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912293/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31766204
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9110965
work_keys_str_mv AT elashramsaeeda prophylacticandtherapeuticefficacyofprebioticsupplementationagainstintestinalcoccidiosisinrabbits
AT aboelhadidshawkym prophylacticandtherapeuticefficacyofprebioticsupplementationagainstintestinalcoccidiosisinrabbits
AT abdelkafyelsayedm prophylacticandtherapeuticefficacyofprebioticsupplementationagainstintestinalcoccidiosisinrabbits
AT hashemshymaaa prophylacticandtherapeuticefficacyofprebioticsupplementationagainstintestinalcoccidiosisinrabbits
AT mahrousliliann prophylacticandtherapeuticefficacyofprebioticsupplementationagainstintestinalcoccidiosisinrabbits
AT farghlyemanm prophylacticandtherapeuticefficacyofprebioticsupplementationagainstintestinalcoccidiosisinrabbits
AT moawadusamak prophylacticandtherapeuticefficacyofprebioticsupplementationagainstintestinalcoccidiosisinrabbits
AT kamelasmaaa prophylacticandtherapeuticefficacyofprebioticsupplementationagainstintestinalcoccidiosisinrabbits