Cargando…

Comparison of Orthognathic Surgery Outcomes Between Patients With and Without Underlying High-Risk Conditions: A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach and Practical Guidelines

Orthognathic surgery (OGS) has been successfully adopted for managing a wide spectrum of skeletofacial deformities, but patients with underlying conditions have not been treated using OGS because of the relatively high risk of surgical anesthetic procedure-related complications. This study compared...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chou, Pang-Yun, Denadai, Rafael, Chen, Chit, Pai, Betty Chien-Jung, Hsu, Kai-Hsiang, Chang, Che-Tzu, Pascasio, Dax, Lin, Jennifer Ann-Jou, Chen, Yu-Ray, Lo, Lun-Jou
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31652792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111760
_version_ 1783479458165948416
author Chou, Pang-Yun
Denadai, Rafael
Chen, Chit
Pai, Betty Chien-Jung
Hsu, Kai-Hsiang
Chang, Che-Tzu
Pascasio, Dax
Lin, Jennifer Ann-Jou
Chen, Yu-Ray
Lo, Lun-Jou
author_facet Chou, Pang-Yun
Denadai, Rafael
Chen, Chit
Pai, Betty Chien-Jung
Hsu, Kai-Hsiang
Chang, Che-Tzu
Pascasio, Dax
Lin, Jennifer Ann-Jou
Chen, Yu-Ray
Lo, Lun-Jou
author_sort Chou, Pang-Yun
collection PubMed
description Orthognathic surgery (OGS) has been successfully adopted for managing a wide spectrum of skeletofacial deformities, but patients with underlying conditions have not been treated using OGS because of the relatively high risk of surgical anesthetic procedure-related complications. This study compared the OGS outcomes of patients with and without underlying high-risk conditions, which were managed using a comprehensive, multidisciplinary team-based OGS approach with condition-specific practical perioperative care guidelines. Data of surgical anesthetic outcomes (intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, need for prolonged intubation, reintubation, admission to an intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, and complications), facial esthetic outcomes (professional panel assessment), and patient-reported outcomes (FACE-Q social function, psychological well-being, and satisfaction with decision scales) of consecutive patients with underlying high-risk conditions (n = 30) treated between 2004 and 2017 were retrospectively collected. Patients without these underlying conditions (n = 30) treated during the same period were randomly selected for comparison. FACE-Q reports of 50 ethnicity-, sex-, and age-matched healthy individuals were obtained. The OGS-treated patients with and without underlying high-risk conditions differed significantly in their American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification (p < 0.05), Charlson comorbidity scores, and Elixhauser comorbidity scores. The two groups presented similar outcomes (all p > 0.05) for all assessed outcome parameters, except for intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001; 974.3 ± 592.7 mL vs. 657.6 ± 355.0 mL). Comparisons with healthy individuals revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05). The patients with underlying high-risk conditions treated using a multidisciplinary team-based OGS approach and the patients without the conditions had similar OGS-related outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6912447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69124472020-01-02 Comparison of Orthognathic Surgery Outcomes Between Patients With and Without Underlying High-Risk Conditions: A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach and Practical Guidelines Chou, Pang-Yun Denadai, Rafael Chen, Chit Pai, Betty Chien-Jung Hsu, Kai-Hsiang Chang, Che-Tzu Pascasio, Dax Lin, Jennifer Ann-Jou Chen, Yu-Ray Lo, Lun-Jou J Clin Med Article Orthognathic surgery (OGS) has been successfully adopted for managing a wide spectrum of skeletofacial deformities, but patients with underlying conditions have not been treated using OGS because of the relatively high risk of surgical anesthetic procedure-related complications. This study compared the OGS outcomes of patients with and without underlying high-risk conditions, which were managed using a comprehensive, multidisciplinary team-based OGS approach with condition-specific practical perioperative care guidelines. Data of surgical anesthetic outcomes (intraoperative blood loss, operative duration, need for prolonged intubation, reintubation, admission to an intensive care unit, length of hospital stay, and complications), facial esthetic outcomes (professional panel assessment), and patient-reported outcomes (FACE-Q social function, psychological well-being, and satisfaction with decision scales) of consecutive patients with underlying high-risk conditions (n = 30) treated between 2004 and 2017 were retrospectively collected. Patients without these underlying conditions (n = 30) treated during the same period were randomly selected for comparison. FACE-Q reports of 50 ethnicity-, sex-, and age-matched healthy individuals were obtained. The OGS-treated patients with and without underlying high-risk conditions differed significantly in their American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) classification (p < 0.05), Charlson comorbidity scores, and Elixhauser comorbidity scores. The two groups presented similar outcomes (all p > 0.05) for all assessed outcome parameters, except for intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.001; 974.3 ± 592.7 mL vs. 657.6 ± 355.0 mL). Comparisons with healthy individuals revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05). The patients with underlying high-risk conditions treated using a multidisciplinary team-based OGS approach and the patients without the conditions had similar OGS-related outcomes. MDPI 2019-10-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6912447/ /pubmed/31652792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111760 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chou, Pang-Yun
Denadai, Rafael
Chen, Chit
Pai, Betty Chien-Jung
Hsu, Kai-Hsiang
Chang, Che-Tzu
Pascasio, Dax
Lin, Jennifer Ann-Jou
Chen, Yu-Ray
Lo, Lun-Jou
Comparison of Orthognathic Surgery Outcomes Between Patients With and Without Underlying High-Risk Conditions: A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach and Practical Guidelines
title Comparison of Orthognathic Surgery Outcomes Between Patients With and Without Underlying High-Risk Conditions: A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach and Practical Guidelines
title_full Comparison of Orthognathic Surgery Outcomes Between Patients With and Without Underlying High-Risk Conditions: A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach and Practical Guidelines
title_fullStr Comparison of Orthognathic Surgery Outcomes Between Patients With and Without Underlying High-Risk Conditions: A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach and Practical Guidelines
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Orthognathic Surgery Outcomes Between Patients With and Without Underlying High-Risk Conditions: A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach and Practical Guidelines
title_short Comparison of Orthognathic Surgery Outcomes Between Patients With and Without Underlying High-Risk Conditions: A Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach and Practical Guidelines
title_sort comparison of orthognathic surgery outcomes between patients with and without underlying high-risk conditions: a multidisciplinary team-based approach and practical guidelines
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912447/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31652792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111760
work_keys_str_mv AT choupangyun comparisonoforthognathicsurgeryoutcomesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutunderlyinghighriskconditionsamultidisciplinaryteambasedapproachandpracticalguidelines
AT denadairafael comparisonoforthognathicsurgeryoutcomesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutunderlyinghighriskconditionsamultidisciplinaryteambasedapproachandpracticalguidelines
AT chenchit comparisonoforthognathicsurgeryoutcomesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutunderlyinghighriskconditionsamultidisciplinaryteambasedapproachandpracticalguidelines
AT paibettychienjung comparisonoforthognathicsurgeryoutcomesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutunderlyinghighriskconditionsamultidisciplinaryteambasedapproachandpracticalguidelines
AT hsukaihsiang comparisonoforthognathicsurgeryoutcomesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutunderlyinghighriskconditionsamultidisciplinaryteambasedapproachandpracticalguidelines
AT changchetzu comparisonoforthognathicsurgeryoutcomesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutunderlyinghighriskconditionsamultidisciplinaryteambasedapproachandpracticalguidelines
AT pascasiodax comparisonoforthognathicsurgeryoutcomesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutunderlyinghighriskconditionsamultidisciplinaryteambasedapproachandpracticalguidelines
AT linjenniferannjou comparisonoforthognathicsurgeryoutcomesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutunderlyinghighriskconditionsamultidisciplinaryteambasedapproachandpracticalguidelines
AT chenyuray comparisonoforthognathicsurgeryoutcomesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutunderlyinghighriskconditionsamultidisciplinaryteambasedapproachandpracticalguidelines
AT lolunjou comparisonoforthognathicsurgeryoutcomesbetweenpatientswithandwithoutunderlyinghighriskconditionsamultidisciplinaryteambasedapproachandpracticalguidelines