Cargando…

Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study

Neck lymph node (LN) recurrence in the irradiated field represents an important aspect of treatment failure after primary radiotherapy owing to the lack of a standard treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife treatment for neck LN recurrence after radio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kobayashi, Daijiro, Sato, Hiro, Saitoh, Jun-ichi, Oike, Takahiro, Nakajima, Atsushi, Noda, Shin-ei, Kato, Shingo, Iwanaga, Mototaro, Shimizu, Tsuneo, Nakano, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703442
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111911
_version_ 1783479509561901056
author Kobayashi, Daijiro
Sato, Hiro
Saitoh, Jun-ichi
Oike, Takahiro
Nakajima, Atsushi
Noda, Shin-ei
Kato, Shingo
Iwanaga, Mototaro
Shimizu, Tsuneo
Nakano, Takashi
author_facet Kobayashi, Daijiro
Sato, Hiro
Saitoh, Jun-ichi
Oike, Takahiro
Nakajima, Atsushi
Noda, Shin-ei
Kato, Shingo
Iwanaga, Mototaro
Shimizu, Tsuneo
Nakano, Takashi
author_sort Kobayashi, Daijiro
collection PubMed
description Neck lymph node (LN) recurrence in the irradiated field represents an important aspect of treatment failure after primary radiotherapy owing to the lack of a standard treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife treatment for neck LN recurrence after radiotherapy. Between 2008 and 2016, 55 neck LN recurrences after radiotherapy in 16 patients were treated with CyberKnife. The median follow-up period was 17 months (range, 2–53 months). The median previous radiotherapy dose was 68 Gy (range, 50–70 Gy). The median marginal dose as equivalent dose delivered in 2-Gy fractions (α/β = 10) was 50 Gy (range, 40–58 Gy). The one-year local control (LC) and overall survival rates were 81% and 71%, respectively. The one-year LC was higher with a target volume ≤1.0 cm(3) than that with a target volume >1.0 cm(3) (p = 0.006). Fatal bleeding was observed in one patient who had large (91 cm(3)) and widespread tumor with invasion to the carotid artery before CyberKnife treatment. CyberKnife treatment for neck LN recurrence is safe and feasible in most cases. Indication for the treatment should be carefully considered for large and widespread tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6912661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69126612020-01-02 Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study Kobayashi, Daijiro Sato, Hiro Saitoh, Jun-ichi Oike, Takahiro Nakajima, Atsushi Noda, Shin-ei Kato, Shingo Iwanaga, Mototaro Shimizu, Tsuneo Nakano, Takashi J Clin Med Article Neck lymph node (LN) recurrence in the irradiated field represents an important aspect of treatment failure after primary radiotherapy owing to the lack of a standard treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife treatment for neck LN recurrence after radiotherapy. Between 2008 and 2016, 55 neck LN recurrences after radiotherapy in 16 patients were treated with CyberKnife. The median follow-up period was 17 months (range, 2–53 months). The median previous radiotherapy dose was 68 Gy (range, 50–70 Gy). The median marginal dose as equivalent dose delivered in 2-Gy fractions (α/β = 10) was 50 Gy (range, 40–58 Gy). The one-year local control (LC) and overall survival rates were 81% and 71%, respectively. The one-year LC was higher with a target volume ≤1.0 cm(3) than that with a target volume >1.0 cm(3) (p = 0.006). Fatal bleeding was observed in one patient who had large (91 cm(3)) and widespread tumor with invasion to the carotid artery before CyberKnife treatment. CyberKnife treatment for neck LN recurrence is safe and feasible in most cases. Indication for the treatment should be carefully considered for large and widespread tumors. MDPI 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6912661/ /pubmed/31703442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111911 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kobayashi, Daijiro
Sato, Hiro
Saitoh, Jun-ichi
Oike, Takahiro
Nakajima, Atsushi
Noda, Shin-ei
Kato, Shingo
Iwanaga, Mototaro
Shimizu, Tsuneo
Nakano, Takashi
Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study
title Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study
title_full Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study
title_short Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study
title_sort efficacy and feasibility of salvage re-irradiation with cyberknife for in-field neck lymph node recurrence: a retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703442
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111911
work_keys_str_mv AT kobayashidaijiro efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy
AT satohiro efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy
AT saitohjunichi efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy
AT oiketakahiro efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy
AT nakajimaatsushi efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy
AT nodashinei efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy
AT katoshingo efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy
AT iwanagamototaro efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy
AT shimizutsuneo efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy
AT nakanotakashi efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy