Cargando…
Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study
Neck lymph node (LN) recurrence in the irradiated field represents an important aspect of treatment failure after primary radiotherapy owing to the lack of a standard treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife treatment for neck LN recurrence after radio...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111911 |
_version_ | 1783479509561901056 |
---|---|
author | Kobayashi, Daijiro Sato, Hiro Saitoh, Jun-ichi Oike, Takahiro Nakajima, Atsushi Noda, Shin-ei Kato, Shingo Iwanaga, Mototaro Shimizu, Tsuneo Nakano, Takashi |
author_facet | Kobayashi, Daijiro Sato, Hiro Saitoh, Jun-ichi Oike, Takahiro Nakajima, Atsushi Noda, Shin-ei Kato, Shingo Iwanaga, Mototaro Shimizu, Tsuneo Nakano, Takashi |
author_sort | Kobayashi, Daijiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neck lymph node (LN) recurrence in the irradiated field represents an important aspect of treatment failure after primary radiotherapy owing to the lack of a standard treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife treatment for neck LN recurrence after radiotherapy. Between 2008 and 2016, 55 neck LN recurrences after radiotherapy in 16 patients were treated with CyberKnife. The median follow-up period was 17 months (range, 2–53 months). The median previous radiotherapy dose was 68 Gy (range, 50–70 Gy). The median marginal dose as equivalent dose delivered in 2-Gy fractions (α/β = 10) was 50 Gy (range, 40–58 Gy). The one-year local control (LC) and overall survival rates were 81% and 71%, respectively. The one-year LC was higher with a target volume ≤1.0 cm(3) than that with a target volume >1.0 cm(3) (p = 0.006). Fatal bleeding was observed in one patient who had large (91 cm(3)) and widespread tumor with invasion to the carotid artery before CyberKnife treatment. CyberKnife treatment for neck LN recurrence is safe and feasible in most cases. Indication for the treatment should be carefully considered for large and widespread tumors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6912661 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-69126612020-01-02 Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study Kobayashi, Daijiro Sato, Hiro Saitoh, Jun-ichi Oike, Takahiro Nakajima, Atsushi Noda, Shin-ei Kato, Shingo Iwanaga, Mototaro Shimizu, Tsuneo Nakano, Takashi J Clin Med Article Neck lymph node (LN) recurrence in the irradiated field represents an important aspect of treatment failure after primary radiotherapy owing to the lack of a standard treatment. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife treatment for neck LN recurrence after radiotherapy. Between 2008 and 2016, 55 neck LN recurrences after radiotherapy in 16 patients were treated with CyberKnife. The median follow-up period was 17 months (range, 2–53 months). The median previous radiotherapy dose was 68 Gy (range, 50–70 Gy). The median marginal dose as equivalent dose delivered in 2-Gy fractions (α/β = 10) was 50 Gy (range, 40–58 Gy). The one-year local control (LC) and overall survival rates were 81% and 71%, respectively. The one-year LC was higher with a target volume ≤1.0 cm(3) than that with a target volume >1.0 cm(3) (p = 0.006). Fatal bleeding was observed in one patient who had large (91 cm(3)) and widespread tumor with invasion to the carotid artery before CyberKnife treatment. CyberKnife treatment for neck LN recurrence is safe and feasible in most cases. Indication for the treatment should be carefully considered for large and widespread tumors. MDPI 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6912661/ /pubmed/31703442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111911 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kobayashi, Daijiro Sato, Hiro Saitoh, Jun-ichi Oike, Takahiro Nakajima, Atsushi Noda, Shin-ei Kato, Shingo Iwanaga, Mototaro Shimizu, Tsuneo Nakano, Takashi Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study |
title | Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study |
title_full | Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study |
title_short | Efficacy and Feasibility of Salvage Re-Irradiation with CyberKnife for In-Field Neck Lymph Node Recurrence: A Retrospective Study |
title_sort | efficacy and feasibility of salvage re-irradiation with cyberknife for in-field neck lymph node recurrence: a retrospective study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912661/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703442 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm8111911 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kobayashidaijiro efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy AT satohiro efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy AT saitohjunichi efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy AT oiketakahiro efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy AT nakajimaatsushi efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy AT nodashinei efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy AT katoshingo efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy AT iwanagamototaro efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy AT shimizutsuneo efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy AT nakanotakashi efficacyandfeasibilityofsalvagereirradiationwithcyberknifeforinfieldnecklymphnoderecurrencearetrospectivestudy |