Cargando…

Comparison of Faecal versus Rumen Inocula for the Estimation of NDF Digestibility

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The evaluation of fibre digestibility is very important for the formulation of ruminant diets. Fibre digestibility is usually determined in lab with rumen inoculum obtained from cannulated cows. The research of alternative and less invasive inoculum sources is a critical issue that s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiaravalli, Maria, Rapetti, Luca, Rota Graziosi, Andrea, Galassi, Gianluca, Crovetto, Gianni Matteo, Colombini, Stefania
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9110928
_version_ 1783479540336558080
author Chiaravalli, Maria
Rapetti, Luca
Rota Graziosi, Andrea
Galassi, Gianluca
Crovetto, Gianni Matteo
Colombini, Stefania
author_facet Chiaravalli, Maria
Rapetti, Luca
Rota Graziosi, Andrea
Galassi, Gianluca
Crovetto, Gianni Matteo
Colombini, Stefania
author_sort Chiaravalli, Maria
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The evaluation of fibre digestibility is very important for the formulation of ruminant diets. Fibre digestibility is usually determined in lab with rumen inoculum obtained from cannulated cows. The research of alternative and less invasive inoculum sources is a critical issue that should be addressed. The present study evaluated the potential of faecal inocula, obtained from cows fed different diets, to assess fibre digestibility of different substrates at different incubation times (48, 240 and 360 h). At short incubation time, fibre digestibility obtained with rumen fluid was always higher than those obtained with faecal inocula, confirming a lower activity of the faecal inocula compared with rumen fluid. However, the type of diets fed to the donor animals had a significant effect on fibre digestibility, with a more active faecal inoculum for cows fed a diet based on maize silage. Despite the differences obtained at the short incubation time, the digestibility values at longer intervals showed that faecal inoculum could replace rumen inoculum. As a consequence, faeces may replace rumen fluid as inoculum for end-point measures, avoiding the use of cannulated animals and decreasing the analytical costs. ABSTRACT: Cow faeces have been investigated as alternative inoculum to replace rumen fluid to determine neutral detergent fibre (NDF) digestibility (NDFD). Aims of this study were to estimate: (1) the NDFD (48 h) of feed ingredients using a rumen inoculum in comparison with faecal inocula from cows fed diets with different forage basis; (2) the undigestible NDF (uNDF) at 240 and 360 h with ruminal fluid and faecal inocula from lactating cows fed two different diets. At 48 h incubation, the NDFD was affected both by feed and type of inoculum (p < 0.01) and by their interaction (p = 0.03). Overall, the mean NDFD was higher for rumen inoculum than for faecal inocula (585 vs. 389 g/kg NDF, p < 0.05), and faecal inoculum obtained from cows fed hay-based diets gave lower NDFD than those from cows fed maize silage (367 vs. 440 g/kg, p < 0.05). At long incubation times, the average uNDF was affected by substrate, inoculum and incubation time (p < 0.01), but not by their interactions. For each inoculum, significantly lower values were obtained at 360 than at 240 h. Regressions between uNDF with rumen and with the tested faecal inocula resulted in r(2) ≥ 0.98. Despite the differences at 48 h, the uNDF showed that faecal inoculum could replace rumen fluid at longer incubation times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6912790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-69127902020-01-02 Comparison of Faecal versus Rumen Inocula for the Estimation of NDF Digestibility Chiaravalli, Maria Rapetti, Luca Rota Graziosi, Andrea Galassi, Gianluca Crovetto, Gianni Matteo Colombini, Stefania Animals (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: The evaluation of fibre digestibility is very important for the formulation of ruminant diets. Fibre digestibility is usually determined in lab with rumen inoculum obtained from cannulated cows. The research of alternative and less invasive inoculum sources is a critical issue that should be addressed. The present study evaluated the potential of faecal inocula, obtained from cows fed different diets, to assess fibre digestibility of different substrates at different incubation times (48, 240 and 360 h). At short incubation time, fibre digestibility obtained with rumen fluid was always higher than those obtained with faecal inocula, confirming a lower activity of the faecal inocula compared with rumen fluid. However, the type of diets fed to the donor animals had a significant effect on fibre digestibility, with a more active faecal inoculum for cows fed a diet based on maize silage. Despite the differences obtained at the short incubation time, the digestibility values at longer intervals showed that faecal inoculum could replace rumen inoculum. As a consequence, faeces may replace rumen fluid as inoculum for end-point measures, avoiding the use of cannulated animals and decreasing the analytical costs. ABSTRACT: Cow faeces have been investigated as alternative inoculum to replace rumen fluid to determine neutral detergent fibre (NDF) digestibility (NDFD). Aims of this study were to estimate: (1) the NDFD (48 h) of feed ingredients using a rumen inoculum in comparison with faecal inocula from cows fed diets with different forage basis; (2) the undigestible NDF (uNDF) at 240 and 360 h with ruminal fluid and faecal inocula from lactating cows fed two different diets. At 48 h incubation, the NDFD was affected both by feed and type of inoculum (p < 0.01) and by their interaction (p = 0.03). Overall, the mean NDFD was higher for rumen inoculum than for faecal inocula (585 vs. 389 g/kg NDF, p < 0.05), and faecal inoculum obtained from cows fed hay-based diets gave lower NDFD than those from cows fed maize silage (367 vs. 440 g/kg, p < 0.05). At long incubation times, the average uNDF was affected by substrate, inoculum and incubation time (p < 0.01), but not by their interactions. For each inoculum, significantly lower values were obtained at 360 than at 240 h. Regressions between uNDF with rumen and with the tested faecal inocula resulted in r(2) ≥ 0.98. Despite the differences at 48 h, the uNDF showed that faecal inoculum could replace rumen fluid at longer incubation times. MDPI 2019-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6912790/ /pubmed/31703255 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9110928 Text en © 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Chiaravalli, Maria
Rapetti, Luca
Rota Graziosi, Andrea
Galassi, Gianluca
Crovetto, Gianni Matteo
Colombini, Stefania
Comparison of Faecal versus Rumen Inocula for the Estimation of NDF Digestibility
title Comparison of Faecal versus Rumen Inocula for the Estimation of NDF Digestibility
title_full Comparison of Faecal versus Rumen Inocula for the Estimation of NDF Digestibility
title_fullStr Comparison of Faecal versus Rumen Inocula for the Estimation of NDF Digestibility
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Faecal versus Rumen Inocula for the Estimation of NDF Digestibility
title_short Comparison of Faecal versus Rumen Inocula for the Estimation of NDF Digestibility
title_sort comparison of faecal versus rumen inocula for the estimation of ndf digestibility
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6912790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31703255
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani9110928
work_keys_str_mv AT chiaravallimaria comparisonoffaecalversusrumeninoculafortheestimationofndfdigestibility
AT rapettiluca comparisonoffaecalversusrumeninoculafortheestimationofndfdigestibility
AT rotagraziosiandrea comparisonoffaecalversusrumeninoculafortheestimationofndfdigestibility
AT galassigianluca comparisonoffaecalversusrumeninoculafortheestimationofndfdigestibility
AT crovettogiannimatteo comparisonoffaecalversusrumeninoculafortheestimationofndfdigestibility
AT colombinistefania comparisonoffaecalversusrumeninoculafortheestimationofndfdigestibility